More likely that you get a big, full saucer for that role post-Four Year War IMOThe flight deck has a place.
That place is on the next generation Super Archer.
SUPER ARCHER - 240ktons, 12 deck sphere primary hull. Large warp 8 core. Secondary hull flight deck. Large cargo pod. Nacelles in cargo pod configuration. Light shields.
And an entire 12 deck sphere devoted to engineering.
Efficient cruise speed - 6. Maximum cruise 7. Maximum warp something like 7.4, but she's a cargo hauler.
One rapid launcher forward and back. 4 phaser banks to give her reasonable phaser coverage.
Tactical - C-
Science - C- (4)
Engineering - S (oh God fuck tons of engineering)
Starfleet no joke absolutely 100% needs to build this ship for the same reason they are still building Archers. It blows any other possible engineering ship out of the water. The Super Archer would deliver more cargo and a higher engineering score faster at a not very much higher cost compared to an Archer.
Starfleet will shatter their molars grinding their teeth, then order 20.
We got a pretty harsh lesson about specialist non-combat ships in the war
I do agree with including the capacity to haul a Large Cargo Pod; that I would love to see
Looking at timelines, the Archers were in service until 2310, so you'd expect their replacement to enter service a decade before
Which means that design work starts around two decades before, in the 2290s
Which means its probably after Project Excelsior
We're probably looking at a Pharos replacement immediately after we finish the Federation; Pharos started design in 2194, and was commissioned in 2200
So Pharos Nextgen >> Project Excelsior >> Super Archer. And reuse the Excelsior saucer for the Super Archer
IMO
The point of this quest is to try to do better than canon if we can though?On an unrelated note: before anyone else catastrophizes further about the rate of loss on peacetime Excalibur missions, keep in mind that those 5 Excaliburs map one-to-one with the canon 5 Constitutions that got Got, down to the circumstances. And the Connie had one grade better science than the Callie does. Chill out, the Callies are performing to expectations.
That said, the Connies had much worse Tactical despite being 10,000 tons heavier, which almost certainly had impact on their ability to shoot their way out of danger
I mean, they lost 5 out of 14 ships, a loss rate in the 35% range; worse than the Excaliburs
Thats pretty objectively appalling
Last edited: