Agreed.Id rather have a secondary hull for the deflector, instead we can have extra cargo space instead.
Ah, good to know. Could be a way to produce some novel saucer derived shapes in the future if you keep doing it this way.
Agreed.Id rather have a secondary hull for the deflector, instead we can have extra cargo space instead.
Ah, good to know. Could be a way to produce some novel saucer derived shapes in the future if you keep doing it this way.
It's unlikely, but moderately possible, that should they survive/serve for long enough one of these ships could (as a training ship hastily called into battle) show up at Wolf 359, replacing the Connie that did in canon.I want the biggest, tankiest, chonkiest ship we can manage. And I'm more than willing to pay for it.
dude, I want to name it the Titanic now, this ship shall never sink!As long as we don't call it the Titanic, this ship will be the biggest and baddest ship this side of the Alpha quadrant.
Actually right now we're mostly centered in the Beta Quadrant, that's where the Romulans and Klingons are.As long as we don't call it the Titanic, this ship will be the biggest and baddest ship this side of the Alpha quadrant.
Don't worry. The Olympic will never sink!As long as we don't call it the Titanic, this ship will be the biggest and baddest ship this side of the Alpha quadrant.
...if we call it Poseidon, can we go for triple nacelles and a long primary hull?As long as we don't call it the Titanic, this ship will be the biggest and baddest ship this side of the Alpha quadrant.
Well, not the most massive possible... We should stop at 400ktons.Yeah, knowing this is the outer edge of the saucer now the only reasonably choice is:
[ ] 180 Meter, 3 Decks (Mass: 114kt) [Cost: 22.5]
Our choices and all the arguments held up to now are based on the most massive ships possible, to suddenly not maximise where we can is illogical.
Dreadnought![ ] 180 Meter, 3 Decks (Mass: 114kt) [Cost: 22.5]
obviously we should go for the highest one
Going by the Excalibur saucer/connie style secondary value you'd be looking at about 142,860 tonnes of secondary hull (and nacelles) for a 400kt ship and 128,570 tonnes secondary/nacelles for a 360kt ship.Well, not the most massive possible... We should stop at 400ktons.
350ktons of BEEG SAUCER. 50kton secondary hull.
The secondary hull consists entirely of a pair of thrusters strapped to a shuttlebay and stapled to the bottom of the ship.Going by the Excalibur saucer/connie style secondary value you'd be looking at about 142,860 tonnes of secondary hull (and nacelles) for a 400kt ship and 128,570 tonnes secondary/nacelles for a 360kt ship.
Still got 1h and 12m to go.
THIS THIS THIS!!![ ] 180 Meter, 3 Decks (Mass: 114kt) [Cost: 22.5]
I'm not sacrificing phaser damage because people can't do cost efficiency comparisons.
I agree but you are well over an hour early.[X] 180 Meter, 3 Decks (Mass: 114kt) [Cost: 22.5]
We voted for big, let's go big.
And we prototype the saucer separation system that will be later used as an emergency escape from an exploding warp core, but in the case of the Federation class it's so the secondary hull can detached and fly around like the universe's biggest shuttle craft.The secondary hull consists entirely of a pair of thrusters strapped to a shuttlebay and stapled to the bottom of the ship.
Hm, maybe the relevant text needs increased by ten font sizes and colored red...We've literally got over an hour before we can vote, please stop voting.
I agree but you are well over an hour early.