I think that with this being one of two Warp 8 ship designs, that it should be expected to be able to fight.I think light covariant is probably the better option here unless we want this ship to have a significant role in the 4 year war.
Higher Maneuverability synergizes with Rapid Fire Launchers more than better shields since it not only provides a increase to survivability but makes it easier to line up weapons such as torpedoes.Maxed out maneuverability either means two thrusters or a 90kt ship.
Two thrusters, especially, is going to hurt more than buying the bigger shield, and I don't think we can make a good enough science vessel at 90kt.
I'd say go for above average maneuverability with a 120k hull and one thruster - slightly smaller than the Newton, with a more space-efficient hull layout. With Standard Shields and a Rapid Launcher it should be a notably better fighter even if it's a little less agile. (And it might not be. The Newton was High, not Very High.)
Mmm. I'd agree that a heavier ship makes the light covariant much more palatable; I'm specifically aiming for having notably better shields than the Newton, and that can be done either through heavier shielding or a heavier ship. And a bigger ship will have more room for scientific and medical equipment.The fact that two Type 3's can give us maxed out Maneuverability even on a 180kt hull also means that we have a much greater level of tonnage leeway with the Light Covariant's since even on a 180kt hull the Light Covariant's cost less than a Standard on a 120kt hull
Honestly, no?I'm thinking standard. It's going to come out around the time of the Four Years War, and that means BoPs. BoPs everywhere. Space just absolutely hopping with BoPs. I'd like these things to be able to survive a BoP ambush at least for long enough to run away, and that means it needs better shields.
The heavier shields increase cost by enough that the second thruster is cheaper if the ship has more than 25 shield power. And if we go over 90kt, we need the second thruster anyways.Mmm. I'd agree that a heavier ship makes the light covariant much more palatable; I'm specifically aiming for having notably better shields than the Newton, and that can be done either through heavier shielding or a heavier ship. And a bigger ship will have more room for scientific and medical equipment.
It's not going to be cheaper, though. The second thruster alone is going to increase the price by more than the heavier shields.
For the cost of a 150kt ship (Archer sized) with Light Covariant's you could only afford a 100kt Standard Covariant ship (11.25 vs 11.4).Mmm. I'd agree that a heavier ship makes the light covariant much more palatable; I'm specifically aiming for having notably better shields than the Newton, and that can be done either through heavier shielding or a heavier ship. And a bigger ship will have more room for scientific and medical equipment.
It's not going to be cheaper, though. The second thruster alone is going to increase the price by more than the heavier shields.
I would also argue that having the additional internal facilities thanks to having a larger ship is worth that extra cost.[X] Type-3 Impulse Thruster [Theoretical] (Three Success Rolls: Size -> Thrust -> Prototype Performance)
Project Halley Cost: 34 (B-)
Project Newton Cost: 30 (A+) [+17 Cost Planned]
Ultimately it is a question as to which is more important: cost or capability. Starfleet hasn't given you any budgetary red lines on this project, although obviously the cheaper the better, and the shield does constitute a significant entry on the balance sheet.
The Newton, our pre-Excalibur Warp 7 engineering warship that didn't quite cut it versus D6s, had 19 Shields.RE: the Light vs Standard shields debate, I am having a hard time deciding, because the numbers are meaningless to me. It doesn't matter if we have 15 or 20 shields, because I don't know what that actually means aside from "bigger number is better"