- Location
- Northern Ireland, UK
[X] Give the order to have Sev'rance assassinated. She's too much of a liability for your future plans and she's certainly replaceable.
And yet it is 100% factually true.
We are a Good Sith.
Both from a moral perspective as we have more morals than most Sith of the last few thousand years put together, and because when angered we show no mercy, we break our foes, we turn others to our cause and are willing to do anything if it will accomplish our goals.
Err ... I'm going to have to disagree on the "Good" Sith part. Better? Sure. Good? Ehhhh ...
"Just because you're a good Sith doesn't make you Good Sith."
But when compared to the actually good Sith, the Sith who embraced the Light Side instead of the Dark Side, we aren't good.It's a relative thing.
When compared to the vast majority of Sith that has been before, we are good.
But when compared to the actually good Sith, the Sith who embraced the Light Side instead of the Dark Side, we aren't good.
But when compared to the actually good Sith, the Sith who embraced the Light Side instead of the Dark Side, we aren't good.
It's a relative thing.
When compared to the vast majority of Sith that has been before, we are good.
So she's neutral at best.Of course there is also the detail that Ciaran hasn't embraced the Dark Side either. AT ALL.
is there a comparative stat table anywhere? for things like Lore and Martial in particular. im curious about how we stack up to the average jedi knight or master.
I mentioned this a while back, but I can repost it for posterity. In general, the stat scale works like so:
Skill Level:
0-10 Weak/Helpless (Force-users)
11-20 Normal/Weak (Force-users)
21-30 Skilled/Normal (Force-users)
31-40 Very Skilled/Skilled (Force-users)
41-50 Extremely Skilled/Very Skilled (Force-users)
51-60 Inhuman/Extremely Skilled (Force-users)
Force users are held to higher standards due to being able to use the Force to boost their abilities.
Do bear in mind that said scale is very much a generalization, and the statistics might not always perfectly reflect the narrative due to gameplay reasons. I try to keep it as close as I can though.
Also... the whole talk about the Decimator and the fact that it can hold up to 8 people as infantry support made me think this:
DRIVE ME CLOSER! I WANT TO HIT THEM WITH MY LIGHTSABER!
Not yet. But once theBig ZamDecimators are mass-produced, those Baneites will be dead before they know it!
Now you've made me think about a tank wielding a lightsaber. Now I made myself imagine a duel between lightsaber-wielding tanks. Enjoy that thought.
Pictured: Knight Stubby and Knight Chubby fighting in defense of the Republic.
Edit: Why not. We are a Good Sith in the same way that the Doctor is a good Dalek.
Err ... I'm going to have to disagree on the "Good" Sith part. Better? Sure. Good? Ehhhh ...
"Just because you're a good Sith doesn't make you Good Sith."
BAAAAAANNNNNNNNDDDDDD WAAGOOOOOON.Yeah so I was planning on leaving this open a while longer but then the landslide happened. So murder it is!
I'd say she's neutral with altruistic tendencies while being amoral about her actions. She does things because she wants to, not because of a deep philosophy or a need for controling others. She tends to do things that help others while helping herself at the same time, which can be considered good or not based on one's own perspective on thoughts and actions.
I'd say she's evil with altruistic tendencies. Someone willing to do evil things to other people out of greed rather than out of love for evilness is still evil, and she most certainly has hurt innocent people out of greed (or at least been willing to).I'd say she's neutral with altruistic tendencies while being amoral about her actions.
What Grievous should do next is set up the world's biggest fishing line with the opee fish on the hook as bait so he can capture a Sando Aqua Monster."YES! COME FACE ME, MY PREY!" Grievous roared out as he set his bongo on a collision course with an opee fish, his unwitting partner Jar Jar screaming wildly.
I'd say she's neutral with altruistic tendencies while being amoral about her actions. She does things because she wants to, not because of a deep philosophy or a need for controling others. She tends to do things that help others while helping herself at the same time, which can be considered good or not based on one's own perspective on thoughts and actions.
She is one GREEDY FUCK though, that's for sure.
In other words a successful business person.I'd say she's evil with altruistic tendencies. Someone willing to do evil things to other people out of greed rather than out of love for evilness is still evil, and she most certainly has hurt innocent people out of greed (or at least been willing to).