Will we ever get an action to sway Anakin to make this official?
Never in the Jedi's history has it been forbidden to leave the order, and in that same conversation with Anakin, we have reminded him that leaving is a real option, that there really isn't anything stopping him from leaving. That is the point where he finally accepted that he wasn't a slave, and that the Council weren't just his new masters. Bosses that he didn't always agree with, sure, but not his owners.

He's had plenty of time to think about himself and his life since that conversation. He's left behind his old assumption that the life of a Jedi is the only life he could live, so the only explanation for why he's still in the order is because he's decided to stay. He's weighed his options and has made the decision that he is a Jedi.

Basically, we've set up Anakin -- though frankly, it was that single interlude and miniarc that did most of the work -- to decide to leave the 'Jedi Order' and becoming a Jedi 'Knight-Errant' -- a wanderer, an 'Exile', or even a 'Jedi Lord' in the original sense. Remember that the original Jedi Lords were not 'Jedi who seize power to become dictators' -- no, they were Jedi who defied the Council and proactively went out into the galaxy to defend the defenseless and promote justice in the lawless parts of the galaxy. For this, they were trusted as judges and as lawgivers when the existing power-structure collapsed.
The Jedi Lords are a flawed concept. When they first came into being their existence made sense and they were useful, but in this age they have no reason to exist. Just look at the Corellian Jedi, who are basically an example of what the Jedi Lords would be if they were still around. They ignore the countless cries for help in the galaxy because they don't care about the rest of the galaxy, they only care about Corellia. Jedi Lords would inevitably end up putting the interests over their own planet over anyone or anything else.

As for your actual idea of going around helping people, Coruscant Jedi are allowed do that and have done so often, especially in the time before the Clone Wars.

I´m not saying they are bad guys or that all of the Jedis live disconnected, but Jedis (as an organization) have been in the galaxy for thousands of years, and the galaxy has changed a lot since then, but they have remained basically the same, if after so much time the have not adapted to the new galaxy, they are quite inmovilistic, and that makes them firly disconnected from the galaxy as a whole.
That is completely untrue. Back in the days of the Old Republic, they were much more militarised than they are now and trained as military leaders as well as Jedi. With the downfall of the Sith and the new shape of the galaxy, they left behind such militarism and adapted to a galaxy that was now at peace. Since then, it has been a matter of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". The Jedi have functioned well and continue to function well to this day. It is a mistake to assume that just because an organisation has tradition that they are backwards and out of touch.
 
We are talking about the Jedi, and despite all the good this order has done (and still does) they are incredibly dogmatic in their views and methods, and very disconnected from the realities of the Galaxy.
I think you're flanderising the Jedi to an absurd degree. Your views honestly have more in common with one of those silly news omakes than anything grounded in reality. They might have their faults but they're nowhere near as bad as you're making them out to be.
...It really depends on precisely what @Dr. Snark accepts as canon.

Per The Jedi Path -- an in-universe introduction and guidebook to the Force, written by revered Jedi Masters of the past -- the Jedi Order has legal remit to kidnap Force-sensitive children from their parents. Notably, it sees nothing wrong with this. Specifically it says: "We Jedi firmly believe that Force-strong beings have a right to receive the best training available, and our way requires shunning emotional commitment, especially toward one's birth family." It also mentions that "Some Masters have argued that the Force's presence in a child indicates the child's consent to join the Order even before he or she is able to speak."

Per Darth Bane: Rule of Two -- the novel that describes the aftermath of the Seventh Battle of Ruusan -- the Jedi Order shunned the low-level survivors of the battle, disenfranchised and exiled the few surviving Jedi Lords, and denied the petition to create a memorial to honor their sacrifice. It is strongly hinted that after the 'Valley of the Jedi' memorial was created, the Jedi Order actually managed to erase the records of it so people would forget the Jedi Lords ever existed.

Per Coruscant Nights: Jedi Twilight -- a novel that describes the aftermath of Order 66 -- one of those Ruusan survivors was a Jedi Lord named Teepo, who thought that Jedi should use blasters as well as the traditional Jedi lightsaber. For this grave offense (considered a sign of being 'dark', no joke) he and his followers (called 'Paladins') were censured by the Council and exiled from the Jedi Temple.

Per Revenge of the Sith -- the prequel film at the very epicenter of canon -- Mace Windu proposed that, if the Chancellor (not yet revealed to be a Sith) refused to give up his war-time powers once General Grievous was defeated, then the Jedi Order should establish a 'temporary' theocratic regime to ensure that democracy would be preserved and/or restored. This proposal was seemingly accepted by the Council with no voiced opposition.

If any of these canonical sources are regarded as authoritative here... yeah, it's easy to see how such a Jedi Order could be regarded as dogmatic. If all of them are authoritative? How much wiggle room would be left?

It bears repeating that none of this has any connection to the moral status or virtue of any individual Jedi. For instance, Obi-Wan (a Consular, not a Sentinel/recruiter) was shocked and appalled when confronted with the policy for conscripting Jedi-sensitive children mentioned in Outbound Flight, while Jerec (Padawan of the Chief Librarian) was not even aware of the Valley's connection to Ruusan until well after his Fall. Many or even most of the Jedi in the Order could be unaware of the Order's moral failings or the details of some of the policies, or may be so inculcated in that culture that they genuinely don't realize it's wrong.

In other words: if these sources are accurate, it doesn't mean an individual Jedi is corrupt or evil or even particularly malevolent. It does mean, however, that the Jedi Order as an institution is corrupt, verging on irredeemable. But what do you expect from a group who had the sheer hubris to build their center of power over a major Sith shrine and Force nexus, and who have been acting under its insidious influence basically from day one?
 
Last edited:
If any of these canonical sources are regarded as authoritative here... yeah, it's easy to see how such a Jedi Order could be regarded as dogmatic. If all three are authoritative? How much wiggle room would be left?
I should clarify. I'm not arguing that they're not dogmatic, nor that they don't have serious flaws. I'm arguing that they are not, to quote, "incredibly" dogmatic overall. In some cases they are, such as with their policy of recruitment, but in other ways they are not.

Their code and their "there is no emotion" mantra give the impression that the ideal Jedi should be completely emotionless, little more than a biological droid, but a cursory look at any Jedi should tell you that that really isn't the case. Light side emotions such as love, compassion, and joy are common throughout the Jedi and encouraged, with even Grandmaster Yoda himself having a mischievous side of all things. And let's not forget Obi-wan's tendency to snark, Kit Fisto's perpetual smile, and Windu's use of Dark Side emotions in battle, all three of them Council members with Windu once being Master of the Order before he gave the title to Yoda. They are not absolutist when it comes to their dogma, they are interpretive of it.

Per Darth Bane: Rule of Two -- the novel that describes the aftermath of the Seventh Battle of Ruusan -- the Jedi Order shun the low-level survivors of the battle, disenfranchise and exile the few surviving Jedi Lords, and deny the petition to create a memorial to honor their sacrifice. It is strongly hinted (aka: very plausible fanon) that after the 'Valley of the Jedi' memorial was created, the Jedi Order actually managed to erase the records of it so people would forget the Jedi Lords ever existed.
Their suppression of the Valley of the Jedi could've had a number of motives. It could easily have been politics, or the desire to hide a powerful Force nexus bearing the tormented souls of several hundred Jedi and Sith, or maybe they just didn't want more Jedi Lords popping up because of how they'd do nothing but stifle growth in the new galaxy (see: the Corellian Jedi). There really isn't enough information or evidence to say that they did what they did because of dogmatic differences, not when there are other, more plausible reasons for their actions.

Per Revenge of the Sith -- the prequel film at the very epicenter of canon -- Mace Windu proposed that, if the Chancellor (not yet revealed to be a Sith) refused to give up his war-time powers once General Grievous was defeated, then the Jedi Order should establish a 'temporary' theocratic regime to ensure that democracy would be preserved and/or restored. This proposal was seemingly accepted with no opposition.
Well yes, when the Supreme Chancellor is a god damned Sith Lord and you don't know how many people he's corrupted into serving him during his time in office, you can see why they might feel it's necessary to take control themselves. Realpolitik rather than dogma. The Jedi are good people, honourable and loving of the Republic and democracy, so I don't see why you use '' when using the word 'temporary'. When they say temporary regime, they do really mean temporary, not like Palpatine.
 
Last edited:
Considering who Anakin is, what motivates him, and what his current reputation is...
Err...what is Anakin's current reputation?

I know we have an odd mix of some war events happening as in canon, while other war events have been heavily butterflied due to Ciaran's interference. Even the command structure of every side seems to be a bit different.
 
I don´t think that Ani will join us anytime soon, to leave the Jedi order right now would also mean to abandon Ashoka, and I seriously doubt he will abandon the order before she is knighted (unless something drastic happens, like when she was expelled from the order and convicted)
So... wait until the Temple bombing, and we'll pick up both Anakin and Ahsoka? Sure, I'll take that bargain. ("Two Jedi, for the price of one!")

in that same conversation with Anakin, we have reminded him that leaving is a real option, that there really isn't anything stopping him from leaving. That is the point where he finally accepted that he wasn't a slave, and that the Council weren't just his new masters. Bosses that he didn't always agree with, sure, but not his owners.
...Man, you and I read that same interlude in totally opposite ways. I read it as "Ciaran reminded him that leaving is a real option, and he's been weighing that decision ever since." Specifically:
the only explanation for why he's still in the order is because he's decided to stay. He's weighed his options and has made the decision that he is a Jedi.
That's hardly the only explanation. Perhaps he's stayed in the Order because of his attachment to Obi-Wan and Ahsoka. Considering his lifelong 'struggles' with attachment, I view this as far more likely -- he doesn't want to disappoint his Master or his Padawan, and knows that neither of them would ever leave the Order or understand why he would.

The Jedi Lords are a flawed concept. When they first came into being their existence made sense and they were useful, but in this age they have no reason to exist.
...
With the downfall of the Sith and the new shape of the galaxy, they left behind such militarism and adapted to a galaxy that was now at peace. Since then, it has been a matter of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". The Jedi have functioned well and continue to function well to this day. It is a mistake to assume that just because an organisation has tradition that they are backwards and out of touch.
What? Just... what? How can you say "in this age they have no reason to exist," when the entire point of the Jedi Lords was to deal with the realities of a galaxy at war, specifically the realities of those regions in the galaxy (cough Outer Rim) that could not be adequately governed from the Core? That sounds like precisely our current situation.

The entire point of the Separatist movement, the reason so many non-corporate systems joined, was that the Outer Rim was not being adequately governed. And the entire reason it took a thousand years for the Separatist movement to coalesce, was because the Baneite Sith made sure to tamp down on any hint of Separatism until it could be wielded as their weapon against the Jedi. That's not an "if it ain't broke" scenario.

Just look at the Corellian Jedi, who are basically an example of what the Jedi Lords would be if they were still around.They ignore the countless cries for help in the galaxy because they don't care about the rest of the galaxy, they only care about Corellia. Jedi Lords would inevitably end up putting the interests over their own planet over anyone or anything else.
or maybe they just didn't want more Jedi Lords popping up because of how they'd do nothing but stifle growth in the new galaxy (see: the Corellian Jedi)
Again, not even slightly, and you yourself hint at one of the reasons why.
Back in the days of the Old Republic, they were much more militarised than they are now and trained as military leaders as well as Jedi.
The Corellian Jedi are led by and/or descended from a 'Jedi Lord'. That doesn't mean the Jedi Lord is in charge of the planet or its foreign policy. It doesn't mean they have any legal leeway to act outside their system (unlike the Coruscant Jedi, which do have a remit from the Galactic Senate). It doesn't meant that the Corellian Jedi have military training, or military organization, or military experience. In fact, given their isolation (both willing and unwilling), it's far more likely that they have less experience that the main Jedi Order, and that whatever trappings of military remain are mainly ceremonial.

The purpose of a Jedi Lord is to localize authority and responsibility. Rather than a single organization taking responsible for keeping the peace in every single planet in the galaxy (which is what the Coruscant Jedi and post-Ruusan Republic have done), the Jedi Lords took on that responsibility for a single system or (more commonly) for a single sector, with 'retainers' serving in similar roles for systems and planets. It was a federalized structure, and actually worked pretty well (cf. the "Army of Light" responsible for ending the last vestiges of the Sith Empire as a political entity). In fact, it worked so well that in specific hard-to-govern areas, the Jedi Order has recreated the 'Jedi Lords' structure (via "Jedi Watchmen" from the Sentinel corps).

Their code and their "there is no emotion" mantra give the impression that the ideal Jedi should be completely emotionless, little more than a biological droid, but a cursory look at any Jedi should tell you that that really isn't the case.
And here's what I said:
none of this has any connection to the moral status or virtue of any individual Jedi.
Which sounds like you're vehemently agreeing with me, at least for this. Certainly it doesn't qualify as a disproof or refutation of my main points.

Their suppression of the Valley of the Jedi could've had a number of motives. ... There really isn't enough information or evidence to say that they did what they did because of dogmatic differences
There really is. Considering their abhorrent treatment of the survivors of that battle, considering their utter unwillingness to honor the fallen dead, and considering that all of this was based explicitly on their ideological disagreements with the Jedi Lords and on political expedience... yeah, I'm not sure how you can't connect the dots.

Well yes, when the Supreme Chancellor is a god damned Sith Lord and you don't know how many people he's corrupted into serving him during his time in office, you can see why they might feel it's necessary to take control themselves.
And again: they didn't know that. They knew he was a self-serving politician. They knew he was corrupt and power-hungry. But that's as far as it went -- they did not know he was a Sith Lord, or even suspect it.


As for your actual idea of going around helping people, Coruscant Jedi are allowed do that and have done so often, especially in the time before the Clone Wars.
And the ones who do so without the Council's approval and direction are called 'Grey Jedi' or forced out of the Order entirely (the "Lost Twenty" only counts Jedi Masters who left the Order -- there would have been plenty of Knights and Padawans who left for ideological reasons).

For instance, I recently added this snippet to my first 'Briefing the Boss' omake:
- Baltimn: childhood home of Ephaan Kenzon (left Jedi Order), site of School of Hidden Wisdom (dueling academy) [NB: survived Order 66]
Ephaan Kenzon was a Knight who recently left the Jedi Order for ideological reasons. Specifically, during a mission to the Zeemacht Cluster (Inner Rim), he witnessed a grave & obvious injustice (nature unspecified). His master insisted that they focus on their assigned mission; Kenzon insisted that Lawful Good Jedi should not turn a blind eye to injustice. Kenzon defied his master and intervened. On their return to Coruscant, his master brought up his disobedience to the Council, who debated whether Kenzon should be punished or simply exiled. Appalled by the Council's indifference, Kenzon resigned his membership in the Order before they could make a final judgment.

That's the sort of example Anakin would be familiar with.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps he's stayed in the Order because of his attachment to Obi-Wan and Ahsoka. Considering his lifelong 'struggles' with attachment, I view this as far more likely -- he doesn't want to disappoint his Master or his Padawan, and knows that neither of them would ever leave the Order or understand why he would.
I think that would be balanced out by his attachment to Padme and his desire to be with her.

So... wait until the Temple bombing, and we'll pick up both Anakin and Ahsoka? Sure, I'll take that bargain. ("Two Jedi, for the price of one!")
I think it's better to just help get Ahsoka out of trouble and keep them in the order. They'll continue to rise through the ranks of the Jedi, gaining more influence among the rest of the order as they do so. With the eternal gratitude we'll have earned from them both, that means that we'll have a lot of pull within the Jedi Order and easier access to their support. Until such time as their influence grows to that size, their eternal gratitude will still be in effect which means we'll still be able to call on them whenever we want, which isn't much different from how they'd be if they were under our employ.

There's also the fact that they'll grow more powerful more quickly if they don't join us. Their growth under us is limited by how many hero actions we give them, and considering how many heroes we have already and that we only have 2 hero actions per turn, that doesn't bode well for their growth. It's just how this game's mechanics work.

What? Just... what? How can you say "in this age they have no reason to exist," when the entire point of the Jedi Lords was to deal with the realities of a galaxy at war, specifically the realities of those regions in the galaxy (cough Outer Rim) that could not be adequately governed from the Core? That sounds like precisely our current situation.

The entire point of the Separatist movement, the reason so many non-corporate systems joined, was that the Outer Rim was not being adequately governed. And the entire reason it took a thousand years for the Separatist movement to coalesce, was because the Baneite Sith made sure to tamp down on any hint of Separatism until it could be wielded as their weapon against the Jedi. That's not an "if it ain't broke" scenario.
And for this, you have provided me the answer:
In fact, it worked so well that in specific hard-to-govern areas, the Jedi Order has recreated the 'Jedi Lords' structure (via "Jedi Watchmen" from the Sentinel corps).
The system needs tweaking, not an overhaul.

The Corellian Jedi are led by and/or descended from a 'Jedi Lord'. That doesn't mean the Jedi Lord is in charge of the planet or its foreign policy. It doesn't mean they have any legal leeway to act outside their system (unlike the Coruscant Jedi, which do have a remit from the Galactic Senate). It doesn't meant that the Corellian Jedi have military training, or military organization, or military experience. In fact, given their isolation (both willing and unwilling), it's far more likely that they have less experience that the main Jedi Order, and that whatever trappings of military remain are mainly ceremonial.
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. What I said about the Jedi's militarisation was their willingness and ability to change how their order operates as it needs changing, not that the Corellian Jedi own the planet or are militarised.

And here's what I said:
Which sounds like you're vehemently agreeing with me, at least for this. Certainly it doesn't qualify as a disproof or refutation of my main points.
How on earth did you get that? I explain how the order in general is not as dogmatic as you and fanhunter have been saying, and from that you get that only some individual Jedi are like how I said?

There really is. Considering their abhorrent treatment of the survivors of that battle, considering their utter unwillingness to honor the fallen dead, and considering that all of this was based explicitly on their ideological disagreements with the Jedi Lords and on political expedience... yeah, I'm not sure how you can't connect the dots.
Fair enough.

And again: they didn't know that. They knew he was a self-serving politician. They knew he was corrupt and power-hungry. But that's as far as it went -- they did not know he was a Sith Lord, or even suspect it.
A self-serving, corrupt, power-hungry politician that was amassing as much dictatorial and absolute power as he could. Yeah, even if they didn't know he was a Sith Lord, that still doesn't refute the rest of my point.

And the ones who do so without the Council's approval and direction are called 'Grey Jedi' or forced out of the Order entirely (the "Lost Twenty" only counts Jedi Masters who left the Order -- there would have been plenty of Knights and Padawans who left for ideological reasons).
You're acting as if they did something wrong. The Jedi are basically space cops and when cops don't follow the rules, they get sacked, even if everything turned out fine in the end. You would not call the police dogmatic for having the same rules.


I'm getting tired of this argument. My point is and remains that the Jedi are not the Ecclesiarchy. They interpret their dogma instead of blindly following it and they are adaptive to a changing galaxy instead of being disconnected from it.

Also that the Corellian Jedi are completely, utterly useless, having not done done a single noteworthy thing in a thousand years, doing even less when the Clone Wars began. The galaxy as a whole would be better off if the current number of Corellian Jedi were instead Coruscant Jedi.
 
I think it's better to just help get Ahsoka out of trouble and keep them in the order. They'll continue to rise through the ranks of the Jedi, gaining more influence among the rest of the order as they do so. With the eternal gratitude we'll have earned from them both, that means that we'll have a lot of pull within the Jedi Order and easier access to their support. Until such time as their influence grows to that size, their eternal gratitude will still be in effect which means we'll still be able to call on them whenever we want, which isn't much different from how they'd be if they were under our employ.

There's also the fact that they'll grow more powerful more quickly if they don't join us. Their growth under us is limited by how many hero actions we give them, and considering how many heroes we have already and that we only have 2 hero actions per turn, that doesn't bode well for their growth. It's just how this game's mechanics work.
"To own the Galaxy, own the Chosen One, you must."

I really want that guy working for us and besides the benefits from him fighting for our side, his absence could also weaken the Order in Clonewar's aftermath.

But that's both pretty secondary, the most important thing is that he's out of Palpatine range if he's with us. He has to get away from Corrusant, by any means necessary.
 
Re: Recruiting The Chosen One, there's also the issue where we are secretly criminals. And Anakin kinda objecting to that. And to our Hutt ties.

Jedi as a whole need some reforms. Their "no attachments" and "restraint" philosophy have hamstrung them. They are a monastic order and led by their wisest and also their most pious. Issues will be had. Their political power and autonomy have had the standard stuff seep in (though not as badly as they could, given that the Order's been around and this influential since forever), and I'm certain the war has not helped. Because war doesn't mesh well with strict ideologies or the idea of being peacekeepers. There's definitely something a little startling about how the Jedi are fully capable of enacting a coup against Palpatine (well... theoretically), and willing to do so. That said, the sentiment from what Windu suggested isn't a "so that we may enforce the Jedi way on others" as much as a "Athens chasing out a potential tyrant". Of course, how that'd actually play out afterwards is up for debate.

But for all complaints, the Jedi are not malevolent, or malicious, or at all ill-willed. They are a massive organization of superpowered beings with a lot of political power and a galaxy-wide jurisdiction to act as peacekeepers/cops/whatever, and all with little oversight. It's honestly to their credit that they aren't a bigger mess. As much as their philosophy creates problems, it's also probably what's held them back from being, well, the actual theocratic overlords of the galaxy.
 
Last edited:
I really want that guy working for us and besides the benefits from him fighting for our side
As I said, the differences between having him and not having him will be slight. As a hero under our employ, he will do whatever we ask. As a Jedi Knight, he will still do whatever we ask. The difference is that he will be weaker under us and we will not have as much power over the Jedi Order as we otherwise would.

But that's both pretty secondary, the most important thing is that he's out of Palpatine range if he's with us. He has to get away from Corrusant, by any means necessary.
Palpatine has a lot less influence over the boy than we do at this point. Remember that we ourselves live on Coruscant.
 
As I said, the differences between having him and not having him will be slight. As a hero under our employ, he will do whatever we ask. As a Jedi Knight, he will still do whatever we ask. The difference is that he will be weaker under us and we will not have as much power over the Jedi Order as we otherwise would.

Are we talking about the same Anakin? Because you just made the point like five posts up that he's a maverick and very independently-minded. Darra ran off on us when realizing the truth that we're criminals. Anakin? We're lucky if he runs off on us instead of running at us.
 
I'm pretty sure we live most of our time in CNS territory.
Coruscant is still the centre of the galaxy economically, culturally, and politically, most of our most important friends and allies are on Coruscant, and we have more stuff on Coruscant than anywhere else. We even have a CNS embassy on Coruscant, further lowering the amount of time we need to spend in the CNS itself.

Are we talking about the same Anakin? Because you just made the point like five posts up that he's a maverick and very independently-minded. Darra ran off on us when realizing the truth that we're criminals. Anakin? We're lucky if he runs off on us instead of running at us.
Semantics. Obviously he's not going to do whatever we ask.
 
Honestly as cool as it would be to have him under our employ. I think I like him better as a Jedi. The only issue I see is Palpatine's influence.
 
For pretty much those exact same reasons? Padme is close to Palps right? And theres no way Palps isn't doing his 'trust in me Anakin' routine
 
They are a massive organization of superpowered beings with a lot of political power and a galaxy-wide jurisdiction to act as peacekeepers/cops/whatever, and all with little oversight. It's honestly to their credit that they aren't a bigger mess. As much as their philosophy creates problems, it's also probably what's held them back from being, well, the actual theocratic overlords of the galaxy.
That is a very good point. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely -- by that metric, the Jedi Order is doing pretty well. OTOH, I question how much of that was due to their reliance on the light-side of the Force, rather than any particular philosophy. I mean, the vast majority of light-side factions (Luka Sene, Baron Do, etc. -- superpowered beings all) don't seem to be tempted to become theocratic overlords. Even the pre-Ruusan Jedi Order (of Revan's time, for instance) weren't much of a theocracy, whatever their blatant dogmatism re: the Jedi Exile.

In other words, it seems to me that the dark side is where you get the desires for political power and theocratic rule, while permitting an ideological free-for-all. The light-side is less inclined to totalitarianism in the political sphere, but much more rigid on ideological grounds (cf. exiling Teepo's Paladins for daring to fight with a blaster...).


I think that would be balanced out by his attachment to Padme and his desire to be with her.
Anakin may desire to have a relationship with Padme, but they're not married or dating, and haven't even admitted their affection yet. Once that happens, he would reconsider, but for the moment his primary attachments are keeping him in the Jedi Order, not leading him out of it.
Their growth under us is limited by how many hero actions we give them, and considering how many heroes we have already and that we only have 2 hero actions per turn, that doesn't bode well for their growth. It's just how this game's mechanics work.
Not quite; you're forgetting that our Heroes also benefit when they're assigned as 'Hero Support' on successful actions.

The system needs tweaking, not an overhaul.
Except 'Jedi Watchmen' do not have any actual political authority, since they're still agents of the Coruscant Order. Nor do they have public accountability -- they're Sentinels, so they operate out of the shadows. And Watchmen also do overtime work as Jedi 'recruiters' in their sector, so they tend to be seen as the ones responsible for kidnapping children.

All in all, more like 'imposed shadowy mob boss', less like 'beloved local leader'. The system needs overhaul.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
That maybe, just maybe, the Corellian Jedi aren't the worst thing in the world? That maybe their "uselessness" is a direct result of the Coruscant Council's decision to exile them, and disenfranchise them of their political status, and erase their memory? That maybe the galaxy as a whole would be better off if a bunch of Coruscant Jedi were 'Corellian' (or Alderaanian, or Sullustan, or Wroonian, et al) Jedi instead? That a decentralized structure would be better suited for governing a galaxy-sized polity?

I explain how the order in general is not as dogmatic as you and fanhunter have been saying, and from that you get that only some individual Jedi are like how I said?
And my response was that of course individuals may be less dogmatic, without changing the nature of the Order as a whole, as an institution. For instance, Obi-Wan's response when he learns that the Jedi kidnap Force-sensitive children as a matter of course. Likewise, showing that Yoda has a sense of humor (?) doesn't disprove the fact that he believes any attachment must be tainted with possessiveness.

That's what he told Anakin -- having just heard "I had a Force vision that someone I care for dies a horrible painful death", Yoda's response was literally "Rejoice for those around you who transform into the Force. Mourn them, do not. Miss them, do not. Attachment leads to jealousy. The shadow of greed, that is." Tell me that's not dogmatic.

A self-serving, corrupt, power-hungry politician that was amassing as much dictatorial and absolute power as he could. Yeah, even if they didn't know he was a Sith Lord, that still doesn't refute the rest of my point.
Which is fair, though I'd point out the same principle would also hold for, e.g., the Turkish or Egyptian military in their extra-constitutional role of protecting the principles of democracy and secularism. And how many people were really comfortable supporting the (unsuccessful) Turkish coup against Erdogan, or the successful Egyptian coup against the Muslim Brotherhood? I mean, it's one thing to talk about 'Athens throwing out the tyrant', but in practice it's a lot more complicated.

Not to mention that the Jedi Order were active collaborators in centralizing so much power in the Republic's hands in the first place. A thousand years ago, they supported the Ruusan Reformation that abolished the Jedi Lords and consolidated ultimate authority in the Galactic Senate. More recently, the same Jedi Order was responsible for retrieving the (enslaved & programmed to be loyal) Clone Army, as well as submitting themselves as generals under Palpatine's command. Their dogmatism ("The Separatists are led by a Sith, so we must do whatever is necessary to eradicate the threat") is how Palpatine excused and got away with those power grabs in the first place.

As for your actual idea of going around helping people, Coruscant Jedi are allowed do that and have done so often
The Jedi are basically space cops and when cops don't follow the rules, they get sacked, even if everything turned out fine in the end.
So which is it? Are Jedi free to "proactively go out into the galaxy to defend the defenseless and promote justice in the lawless parts of the galaxy"? Or are they space cops who must go where the Council says and only jump when the Council tells them to?
 
Last edited:
Palpatine has a lot less influence over the boy than we do at this point. Remember that we ourselves live on Coruscant.
Err... you sure? Palpatine got his claws into Anakin early, pretty much right after Naboo (33 BBY) if I understand the books correctly.

We didn't meet Anakin until four years later (Turn 9, 29 BBY), and even then our influence was limited to 'we tease him for his infatuation with Padme'.

We made our biggest impression on Anakin when we saved Darra Thel-Tanis, but even then his reaction was mainly one of gratitude. And that was of short duration when he realized we were willing to work with the Hutts. By the end of the last thread (Turn 19, BBY 22), this was his impression of us:
Anakin: Has no idea what to think of you aside from feeling annoyance and gratitude. Usually at the same time.
It wasn't until the beginning of this quest thread that we gained real influence over him: by being a sympathetic voice who understood his struggle, by being a great humanitarian able & willing to get things done, by using our knowledge of Jedi history to offer him an alternative.

Since then, we've proven our words are backed by our actions (saving Rotta the Hutt, organizing the Caamas Ceasfire). We also told him about Darth Vectivus, the Sith who walked away and chose his own destiny. That's why Dr. Snark hasn't updated the relationship status line:
Anakin: O_O (Cannot come to the phone now, please hold)
Because he's still processing everything we've told him, and still unsure what it means. He does consider us to be on his 'favorite persons in the galaxy' list (alongside Palpatine and Padme), and our input has given him a lot to mull over.

However, we don't have nearly the same personal connection and emotional intimacy that Anakin has with Palpatine, no matter how many parties we invite him to. The fact is, Palpatine is still a very real threat, and Anakin is very much in his 'range' for manipulation. Hopefully our insights have delayed Palpatine's plans at least temporarily -- I can only imagine how much of a 'spanner in the works' it would have been, for Anakin to mention "Oh, hey, did you know it's possible to leave the Jedi while staying on the light side? Who knew?!" All the same, Palpatine is very good at the game, and Anakin still trusts him implicitly.

Our best bet to keep Anakin from Falling, is to pull him into our orbit -- as an ally or as a Hero Unit, doesn't matter. And that most likely means we need to persuade him to leave the Jedi Order.
 
I'll just toss out the reminder that Ciaran likes how the Jedi and Republic worked before the war.

Because it made it easier to do her business and kept chaotic factors from interfering.

Even now the Republic and Jedi are fantastically ill-equipped to deal with Ciaran and the Abyss Watchers or even to notice the threat they pose.

Only the Sentinels are in any real position to threaten her interests and even then they don't operate in the right spheres to catch on.

Reforming the Jedi is not to our advantage.
 
That is a very good point. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely -- by that metric, the Jedi Order is doing pretty well. OTOH, I question how much of that was due to their reliance on the light-side of the Force, rather than any particular philosophy. I mean, the vast majority of light-side factions (Luka Sene, Baron Do, etc. -- superpowered beings all) don't seem to be tempted to become theocratic overlords. Even the pre-Ruusan Jedi Order (of Revan's time, for instance) weren't much of a theocracy, whatever their blatant dogmatism re: the Jedi Exile.

In other words, it seems to me that the dark side is where you get the desires for political power and theocratic rule, while permitting an ideological free-for-all. The light-side is less inclined to totalitarianism in the political sphere, but much more rigid on ideological grounds (cf. exiling Teepo's Paladins for daring to fight with a blaster...).
The Light Side does not make people do anything or change people's personality. That's one of the big differences between it and the Dark Side. The reason why all those Light Side factions aren't theocratic overlords is because to become strong in the Light Side - the 'Don't Be a Dick' Side - you have to not be a dick. The Dark Side, on the other hand, is the 'Be a Complete and Utter Dick' Side and actually does warp your personality, which is why they tend to come out all power-hungry and such.

It's worth remembering that while there's more grey in Star Wars than you might first think, there's still quite a lot of black and white.

That maybe the galaxy as a whole would be better off if a bunch of Coruscant Jedi were 'Corellian' (or Alderaanian, or Sullustan, or Wroonian, et al) Jedi instead? That a decentralized structure would be better suited for governing a galaxy-sized polity?
Decentralising the Jedi is the worst thing you can do. Leaving God knows how many separate orders like that with that much independence will inevitably lead to a large amount of ideological drift, resulting in factionism, rivalries, and possibly even violence. Worst of all, it makes it more difficult to prevent Dark Side corruption as such groups would more difficult to police than the members of a centralised organisation. The increased difficulty of policing "rural" areas of the galaxy is an ok price to pay in exchange for far greater security against corruption.

EDIT: After reading their page on the wiki, it seems to me that the uselessness of the Corellian Jedi seems to come from them simply not caring about the rest of the galaxy, not that they're unable to do so because of the actions of the main order. There is in fact no hint that they're hamstrung at all by the Coruscant Jedi.

EDIT2: I'm reading about Thame Cerulian and he was apparently a Corellian Jedi but he was also a Coruscant Jedi? So the Corellians are officially part of the greater Jedi Order I guess?

Likewise, showing that Yoda has a sense of humor (?) doesn't disprove the fact that he believes any attachment must be tainted with possessiveness.
If you're attached to someone, you fear for their safety, and fear leads to the Dark Side. Yoda wasn't wrong.

That's what he told Anakin -- having just heard "I had a Force vision that someone I care for dies a horrible painful death", Yoda's response was literally "Rejoice for those around you who transform into the Force. Mourn them, do not. Miss them, do not. Attachment leads to jealousy. The shadow of greed, that is." Tell me that's not dogmatic.
Dogmatic, sure, but he follows that dogma because there's good reason for that dogma to exist, namely because the dogma is right. Attachment does lead people to the Dark Side, as eventually it did Anakin. It is sound advice, which is why it was made dogma. It remained sound advice, which is why it remained dogma. Yoda's advice to Anakin was good advice, regardless of whether it was dogma or not, and the failure belonged to Anakin in his failure to break his attachment, not in Yoda for advising him to do the thing which would prevent his fall to the Dark Side.

I mean, it's one thing to talk about 'Athens throwing out the tyrant', but in practice it's a lot more complicated.
In a setting about space wizards with laser swords that's aimed primarily at children and teenagers, I don't think it is.

Their dogmatism ("The Separatists are led by a Sith, so we must do whatever is necessary to eradicate the threat") is how Palpatine excused and got away with those power grabs in the first place.
That might be dogmatism, or it could just be a completely appropriate response to the threat of the Sith. Later events would prove how right they were in choosing to do whatever it took to destroy the Sith, just that they were wrong in the specific way they chose to do so.

So which is it? Are Jedi free to "proactively go out into the galaxy to defend the defenseless and promote justice in the lawless parts of the galaxy"? Or are they space cops who must go where the Council says and only jump when the Council tells them to?
The first, but with allowance and direction from the Council. How they were pre-Clone Wars, basically.

Err... you sure? Palpatine got his claws into Anakin early, pretty much right after Naboo (33 BBY) if I understand the books correctly.
I watched Phantom Menace and all I remember him doing was complimenting him on his efforts against the bad guys. Hardly "getting his claws" into him.

EDIT3: We saved his mother's life. That automatically puts us far above Palpatine as to who Anakin trusts and appreciates more.
 
Last edited:
Human's with no attachments quickly go insane. Possibly Yoda's species can actually do that, but humans are hardwired for social contact. Even the most introverted of humans needs SOME human contact to retain mental wellness. Hence why Hermits are either famous holy men with constant pilgrims popping in and out or outright insane.
 
The Rim being poorly governed is an obvious and perennial problem in Star Wars. I don't think that can be laid entirely at the Jedi's feet, and eh on how much even should. Is it actually the Jedi's responsibility to keep the rim in line with a federalized system of Jedi Lords? As far as I'm concerned that's the Senate's purview, and that we really don't want to give the Jedi more authority.

Also, Ciaran's is not a great counterbalance to Palpatine in swaying Anakin. Both of us are on board the "Jedi Order is optional" train, the main difference is who does he go to if he makes that choice. The real counterbalance is Obi-Wan.
 
Reforming the Jedi is not to our advantage.
Agreed, which is why I'm not proposing to reform the Jedi. I'm simply stating that the Jedi are in need of reform, and that we can take advantage of that.


The Dark Side, on the other hand, is the 'Be a Complete and Utter Dick' Side and actually does warp your personality, which is why they tend to come out all power-hungry and such.
Source? Because it sounds like you're saying the only reason dark-siders become "power-hungry" is because their personalities are warped. I'm pretty sure "power corrupts" is not a matter of behavioral conditions by quasi-sentient metaphysical forces, but is pretty directly tied to human nature. In which case it would be the light side that warps your personality, by keeping "power corrupts" from influencing you quite as much.

More generally, my impression (call it headcanon if you must) is that the Force amplifies emotion. Any emotion that you feel while connected to the Force, is amplified and exaggerated and warped out of proportion. If your order is based on pain and hatred, those emotions will be warped out of proportion, and you will become creatures entirely defined by pain and hatred (cf. Sith). If you stress patience and passivity, those emotions will also be exaggerated, and you will become complacent and passive in the face of evil (cf. Baran Do).

Specifically, that's why the Jedi teach "attachment is bad." Attachment is not bad. However, using the Force while feeling attachment, leads to that emotion being amplified, and it's innocuous enough to be overlooked long enough to cause you to Fall. So yes, attachment is dangerous for Force Users. However:
Humans with no attachments quickly go insane. Possibly Yoda's species can actually do that, but humans are hardwired for social contact.
Lack of attachment is quite possibly even more dangerous! Not only does the Force increase feelings of isolation and estrangement from others, but when a Jedi (unaccustomed to attachment) starts to feel attached, they don't have the experience to deal with it or keep it under control. That's why Anakin fell -- he felt attachment, it was amplified, he didn't have the tools to deal with it.

The key through all of this is the moral principle of Aristotle's 'golden mean'. Basically: vices lie on the extremes, virtue lies in the middle. Gluttony is bad, but so is anorexia. Eating a proper amount, with the proper mindset, is best. Profligancy is bad, but so is hoarding all your money. The virtue lies somewhere in between. This is why moderation or temperance is regarded as one of the four cardinal virtues.


That might be dogmatism, or it could just be a completely appropriate response to the threat of the Sith. Later events would prove how right they were in choosing to do whatever it took to destroy the Sith, just that they were wrong in the specific way they chose to do so.
There's a marvelous quote, from A Man For All Seasons (about the life and death of St. Thomas More) that applies here.



Man For All Seasons said:
Roper: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law!
More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you... where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast — man's laws, not God's — and if you cut them down — and you're just the man to do it — d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes. I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.
The Jedi cut down every tree to get after the Sith. And when the Devil turned round... they had nowhere to hide.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top