- Location
- Somewhere else
[X] Plan teambuilding
-[X]Luthor+Pamela - Destroy Jason Woodrue reptation.
-[X]Mercy+Ivo - Tighten security
-[X]Luthor+Pamela - Destroy Jason Woodrue reptation.
-[X]Mercy+Ivo - Tighten security
We are not ignoring it. We have an action dedicated to it. We actually have two actions dedicated two it. And they quite low DC.
What disaster do you expect to happen if we won't get useful information about assassins? Don't act as if it is something we have to do. It isn't
My plan has Mercy working on security so that works against another assassination attempt or sabotage.
Yes, it is pretty important to know who is trying to kill us. But we can learn it later should we be unlucky and don't find it right now. You are again trying to overrepresent the actual importance of the action.The DC is fairly low, but every option this round has a fairly low option. Comparatively, the DC of the investigate the five assassins is a on the upper half. My issue is that your plan is supporting the lowest DC option- the one most likely to succeed, while ignoring the second highest-DC option and also ignoring the "let's try and find out who is trying to kill us" option. In favor of supporting something that already has the highest probability of success (you're just trying to get a higher cooperation in addition to the success). Which is important.
Just, not "People are trying to kill us- who?" and also we know as "someone is trying to puppet both us and the League of Assassins for an unknown reason and we don't know who". So, is it necessary? More necessary than having a higher cooperation above what we will get with a DC 5 option. Also, degree of failure has to be considered: a DC 5 degree of failure is not as high as a DC 23 degree of failure possibility. On a roll of 1 on a DC 23, we might get the police pissed at us, tip our hands to the third party, have the League convinced it was us, and get the wrong idea of who is trying to kill us. So, the entire shadow war on our part will not have a cogent plan.
So, yeah. Pretty important to know who is trying to kill us.
Yes but the previous PR rep will have some knowledge of the inner workings of LexCorpCan we replace our PR rep later by repeating this action if the one we decide on doesn't work out?
Edited for clarity.
Warning, Pamela was under the effects for far longer than Lois was. Trying to paint Lois as "being under residual effects" also heavily effects Pamela's credibility. On top of that people will be conducting analysis on what Woodrue did to others considering he used it on a lot of people (it's how he hid his embezzlement for starters). Having only one person be suffering from lingering effects is kind of skeevy and people will give Lois brain scans to check for lingering influence.I want to release everything with the addendum that we truly emphasize that Louis Lane was influenced.
Perhaps use it to add some minor difficulties to her ever investigating us.... Perhaps we could.... change a bit of info to make it seem like the version he used on Louis will have residual effects.
We do that and she would be suspicious of any dislike or suspicion against us, any investigation she does could be hampered or dismissed outright as she was "under the influence of residual effects", anything she writes against us would be under suspicion, and if we are very lucky she could be outright be prevented from ever investigating due to her being biassed.
Maybe have it show that the specific one he used on Louis was a new version. One meant for longer control.Warning, Pamela was under the effects for far longer than Lois was. Trying to paint Lois as "being under residual effects" also heavily effects Pamela's credibility. On top of that people will be conducting analysis on what Woodrue did to others considering he used it on a lot of people (it's how he hid his embezzlement). Having only one person be suffering from lingering effects is kind of skeevy.
I want to release everything with the addendum that we truly emphasize that Louis Lane was influenced.
Perhaps use it to add some minor difficulties to her ever investigating us.... Perhaps we could.... change a bit of info to make it seem like the version he used on Louis will have residual effects.
We do that and she would be suspicious of any dislike or suspicion against us, any investigation she does could be hampered or dismissed outright as she was "under the influence of residual effects", anything she writes against us would be under suspicion, and if we are very lucky she could be outright be prevented from ever investigating due to her being biassed.
@King crimson could we instead say that he influenced Lois to "find dirt on Luthor" and so she came with the intent of smearing him? The effects had stopped but it soured her impression of Lex And made her biased.
It was not a new version. Woodrue didn't experiment with it too much. The journal explicitly outlines this information and people will replicate this stuff so phony claims will get called out fast.Maybe have it show that the specific one he used on Louis was a new version. One meant for longer control.
Pamela wouldnt have been exposed as she left before he had made it but Louis arrived just in time to be a convenient lab rat.
Yes to an extent. I won't include it in the subvote but it will be an option going forward.@King crimson could we instead say that he influenced Lois to "find dirt on Luthor" and so she came with the intent of smearing him? The effects had stopped but it soured her impression of Lex And made her biased.