Sorry for the late response, I've been busy.
@Hangwind @Mr.rodent I think you're misunderstanidng my argument. I am very aware that Ling Qi, and the concentration of talent in this year are both extrememly abnormal.
However, extremely talented people like Ling Qi and Ji Rong are still vastly, vastly more common than people like Sun Liling and Cai Renxiang, both of whom are virtually guaranteed to be the heirs of their ducal houses, and have resources thrown at them to match (which basically never happens). Meizhen is less rare, having lesser (but still relatively enormous) backing due to her house having vastly more possible heirs.
The question is not are the 'monsters' impressive to the poor schlubs trapped in the tournament with them, and I include literally everyone including Ling Qi who isn't one of the monsters in those schlubs (they undoubtedly are). The question is, from the perspective of one of the higher ranking and powerful adult observers, is their cultivation progress actually that remarkable compared against the standards set by others of their birth rank and resources?
The seperate question secondary question then becomes, how impressive is this compared to someone like Ji Rong or Ling Qi, when considering their circumstances?
I am also very aware that people are more than their cultivation, with Cai having far and away the best achievements amongst them (from an outside perspective), and that can factor in to the outside judgement of how impressive they are. Altough as a side note the early rounds were Shenhua pounding it into Renxiang's head that slacking off on her personal direct combat strength in favour of group leadership arts was not acceptable to her.
So having noted that Ducal Heirs (and scions to a much lesser extent) are in and of themselves extremely rare, imagine that somehow all of them from history were scooped up and placed in the same year and magicallly provided with the same level of backing they would have had in their time. Where would the "monsters" rank then, including their non-cultivation abilities and achievements? Would they still be head and shoulders above the pack, would they be in the top 5%, 10% 40%, would they be middle of the road?
I definitely don't feel they are the best of the best. I feel like they'd probably place in the top 20% easily, but I'm much less sure about anything beyond that.
Now on the entirely seperate point of their where I feel their impressiveness stands in comparison to Ling Qi or Ji Rong, think of it this way: It is very, very impressive for anyone to get into one of the world's top Universities. It is even more impressive for those people to be at the very top of their classes, especially if they're also doing a lot of extra-curricular activities. Doesn't matter if they've had tutors, extra help etc. all their life, it is extremely impressive.
But if you then look at the next highest people in the class (who are still getting very high marks) and find that they were from extremely disadvantaged backgrounds, who started education extremely late (especially in comparison to the aforementioned people) and are working part-time jobs in addition to their studies to help cover their living costs.
There is no doubt who is doing better academically, or in terms of social life. But who do you instinctively feel is more impressive?
Even if the former are still extremely impressive as people, even if you point out all the extra help that the latter have taken advantage of once then arrived, when you place the former next to the latter they don't feel as impressive as they would next to anyone else.
@Hangwind @Mr.rodent I think you're misunderstanidng my argument. I am very aware that Ling Qi, and the concentration of talent in this year are both extrememly abnormal.
However, extremely talented people like Ling Qi and Ji Rong are still vastly, vastly more common than people like Sun Liling and Cai Renxiang, both of whom are virtually guaranteed to be the heirs of their ducal houses, and have resources thrown at them to match (which basically never happens). Meizhen is less rare, having lesser (but still relatively enormous) backing due to her house having vastly more possible heirs.
The question is not are the 'monsters' impressive to the poor schlubs trapped in the tournament with them, and I include literally everyone including Ling Qi who isn't one of the monsters in those schlubs (they undoubtedly are). The question is, from the perspective of one of the higher ranking and powerful adult observers, is their cultivation progress actually that remarkable compared against the standards set by others of their birth rank and resources?
The seperate question secondary question then becomes, how impressive is this compared to someone like Ji Rong or Ling Qi, when considering their circumstances?
I am also very aware that people are more than their cultivation, with Cai having far and away the best achievements amongst them (from an outside perspective), and that can factor in to the outside judgement of how impressive they are. Altough as a side note the early rounds were Shenhua pounding it into Renxiang's head that slacking off on her personal direct combat strength in favour of group leadership arts was not acceptable to her.
So having noted that Ducal Heirs (and scions to a much lesser extent) are in and of themselves extremely rare, imagine that somehow all of them from history were scooped up and placed in the same year and magicallly provided with the same level of backing they would have had in their time. Where would the "monsters" rank then, including their non-cultivation abilities and achievements? Would they still be head and shoulders above the pack, would they be in the top 5%, 10% 40%, would they be middle of the road?
I definitely don't feel they are the best of the best. I feel like they'd probably place in the top 20% easily, but I'm much less sure about anything beyond that.
Now on the entirely seperate point of their where I feel their impressiveness stands in comparison to Ling Qi or Ji Rong, think of it this way: It is very, very impressive for anyone to get into one of the world's top Universities. It is even more impressive for those people to be at the very top of their classes, especially if they're also doing a lot of extra-curricular activities. Doesn't matter if they've had tutors, extra help etc. all their life, it is extremely impressive.
But if you then look at the next highest people in the class (who are still getting very high marks) and find that they were from extremely disadvantaged backgrounds, who started education extremely late (especially in comparison to the aforementioned people) and are working part-time jobs in addition to their studies to help cover their living costs.
There is no doubt who is doing better academically, or in terms of social life. But who do you instinctively feel is more impressive?
Even if the former are still extremely impressive as people, even if you point out all the extra help that the latter have taken advantage of once then arrived, when you place the former next to the latter they don't feel as impressive as they would next to anyone else.