Part of the Strangelove parallels was giving people at least somewhat reasonable arguments and good intentions for what they were doing, so if Nega-Sandra was convincing in that regard, I must've done okay (though I'm willing to admit that I may have been slightly biased in her favour xD ). The fact that she just so happened to be wrong in this case, I feel, shouldn't detract from her having a point.
I'll freely admit that the characterization in the story is the result of some rather significant interpretation on my part.
Aside from being tonally horrendously inconsistent and weird, the main issue was the weird characterisation. And I don't just mean the characters acting literally nothing like themselves in any way whatsoever, it's also that the premise requires the entirety of the UN HQ being the stupidest people to ever exist in human history.
The Antagonists have made a concerted effort to exterminate humanity for decades, and have never ever responded to any communication from humanity. (Except with viral data streams) It would be obvious to literally everyone that any peace is solely a pragmatic measure that will be revoked the very instant they develop countermeasures for whatever threat forced them to make the play.
The UN might agree to peace under those circumstances, but not as a mere Armistice, they'd only accept something like that if it were an actual
surrender on the Antags part. Including total disarmament. Because anything else would be preposterously moronic.
There's also the weird thing of having a humaniform Antag with Anime cliches which doesn't remotely match the tone of the rest of the piece.
And the asinine stupidity of the anti-WF defence. If a countermeasure would cause your own forces more destruction than not using it. i.e. A countermeasure that apparently eradicates your entire species, then they wouldn't use it. Obviously. Contrived plot hole you could drop a planet through.
Also don't forget Dr Strangelove was released in
1964. It's a freaking old movie. I know I haven't seen it, and a lot of other people won't have either.
Bold voice is not Durga.
Bold voice is
Anna. The real Anna. The cynicism and pain and misery and hatred. The Anna the characters are seeing is just the tip of the iceberg, a personality based on what she was like before the Antags. Most of her real self is suppressed.