It is speculation. We have concrete evidence that STRATNET wanted Anna on the battle line, at least up to post 18. What STRATNET wants after that point is unknown, and so people have begun to make assumptions that work on refugee camps and reactivating an Arcology has altered the calculus sufficiently to change its mind. While this is not completely unreasonable to think that STRATNET may have been influenced by such events, there is no definitive evidence that STRATNET has actually altered its preferred placement for Anna.
 
That's three different things:
- Body armor, which got resized to Anna's size
- Two rifles, can't be hold so they're mounted on turrets.
- Snowplow as a shield

Then Anna grabbed more component and weapons. Which she needed to put somewhere for her to use up until we got current Durga.
1) The rifles were themselves resized.
That's the implication of the reference to integrating riot control gear, not just riot control armor.

I mean, even for an adult, putting two 40 inch long weapons the size of an M16 on shoulder mount turrets would significantly mess with their sightlines. Let alone for an 8 year old girl, an age where the average height is 50 inches.
So it has to shrink to be usable.

2) There is no indication that Durga's weapon-mount capacity was limited by weight or space requirements even then.
As opposed to targeting and ammunition constraints.
And most critically, complexity.

3) By the time the Antagonists showed up, Anna had been a Valk builder for a year. 2061 to 2062.

Compare that with the rest of the freshman Valk class, who we see armed in their first week of core use. Look at what Sandra, for example, was carrying on her first day with no experience. Coke Zero has not been a Valk for six months.
If they didn't have trouble fitting weapons, she is unlikely to have. Even with her low compatibility.

Space to fit new weapons on or around the Valk's body doesn't seem to be an issue.
Complexity? Targeting? Impeller control? Those are.

Last we heard about Stratnet it wants her on the front line in Africa.
Originally. Before the refugee building mission. And before Sydney.
We haven't heard anything about STRATNET since.
 
Last edited:
STRATNET actually wants Anna on logistics now I think? I don't know where I heard that but I recall it being a thing.
In post 21 STRATNET wanted Anna to:

>>[Abort. Reveal of such capacity not appropriate for this situation.]
>>[Addendum; Withdraw from active reserve to previous activity. Conceal location from Antagonists.]

You stare at the communique.

What?

STRATNET wants you to avoid combat? You're to leave the rest of your Squadron behind and return?

You demand a justification, and STRATNET delivers it with its usual alacrity.

This Antagonist detachment is not assessed to be particularly dangerous to UN forces, projected UN expenditure to be purely in drones and high yield weaponry expenditure. The Breaches are partitioned existences, there is a high probability that the Berlin Major Breach does not have the full intelligence of your existence and abilities. If the Antagonists subservient to the Berlin breach are aware of you, it is likely they are unsure of your usual operational area and range. Use of your heavy particle projectors would drain your capacitors and power budget against an enemy group without priority targets, degrading your response readiness, in case something that does demand your attention appear. An unlikely scenario that may appear is that the Antagonists may back trace your attacks on their forward element and teleport in Types for their own suicidal recon in force against the weapon platform that can launch such attacks. If a sufficiently large force arrives, it will place significant risks on certain members of both your Squadron and of the nearby town of Saranpaul.

STRATNET wanted Anna to go back to building and not go into combat. 'Previous activity' was Anna helping with building and reconstructing a industrial city.
 
Last edited:
1) The rifles were themselves resized.
That's the implication of the reference to integrating riot control gear, not just riot control armor.

I mean, even for an adult, putting two 40 inch long weapons the size of an M16 on shoulder mount turrets would significantly mess with their sightlines. Let alone for an 8 year old girl, an age where the average height is 50 inches.
So it has to shrink to be usable.
No, the rifles were said to be too big, so the gear is just armor. How can you say "it's resized to fit her size" and then followed by "still can't hold it"?
and on the other end Anna might as well think "I have to grow" to use the equipment instead of "it has to shrink" as you said.
 
In post 21 STRATNET wanted Anna to:



STRATNET wanted Anna to go back to building and not go into combat. 'Previous activity' was Anna helping with building and reconstructing a industrial city.
While in this case it wants Anna to go back as stated the current prediction expects no lives to be lost so there really should be no reason for any valk to intervene let alone Anna. It is telling Anna to do something more productive with her time while there are cheap alternatives to dealing with the scout force. For all we know stratnet still wants Anna to go to Africa but in the immediate term it needs Anna to not reveal her self to a breach that does not know she exist.
 
Honestly what STRATNET wants is somewhat difficult to tell from this update.

First we have Anna receiving an order to deploy:
>[Alert Condition Two. Make ready for combat deployment.]

STRATNET alert.
You are ordered to deploy.
Likely received from STRATNET given the second quote is a follow up to the first.

Then we have TACNET declaring Anna as the commander of the cadet flight:
TACNET takes the decision out of your hands.

>>[Second Lieutenant Anna Sanchez is designated as Samhain Squadron leader.]
>>[Proceed to Nyda for combat resupply and standby as active reserve.]
>>[Further orders to arrive.]
which reinforces the idea that STRATNET has no problems with Anna being deployed here and now.

Then everything continues as planned until Anna suggests blasting the Antagonists at long range:
You are in range.

You can begin firing at this Antagonist force right now. Well before they join combat against UN forces.

Well before they start killing.

All you need is targeting data.

You quickly put through a request to STRATNET for detailed targeting data. Surprisingly, the supercomputer does not immediately reply to you.

You wait, your heavy particle projectors ready, and you are kept waiting for seventeen long seconds.

>>[Abort. Reveal of such capacity not appropriate for this situation.]
>>[Addendum; Withdraw from active reserve to previous activity. Conceal location from Antagonists.]
at which point STRATNET pauses seventeen seconds, an eternity for a supercomputer powered AI network, before telling Anna to run and hide.

I suspect what we are seeing is that STRATNET did not know Anna's HPP are capable of this kind of long range shooting through the earth technique. At which point Anna's strategic value had to be recalculated again hence the long delay as it ran countless simulations regarding her new capability. Those simulations revealed just how insanely useful such an ability could be during it's initial deployment and decided keeping Anna secure was far more important.

I suspect we'll see the HPPs receiving yet another jump in security clearance and even more funding.
 
STRATNET wanted Anna to go back to building and not go into combat. 'Previous activity' was Anna helping with building and reconstructing a industrial city.

The range of Anna's cannons is, apparently, a matter of strategical concern; of course STRATNET wouldn't want to reveal it on a random side clash. This is still not a direct evidence STRATNET doesn't want Anna at Africa though. Africa is called Hell's Gates, a combatant of Anna's caliber is very much needed there.
 
I believe STRATNET wanted Anna at Africa, but demonstration of some of her capabilities might have shifted STRATNET's conclusion on where it wants her right now. The key word here is "might", though at the very least, it should be screaming a little less loudly about shifting the Rank One Valkyrie to the African front.
 
Now, now, there's no reason to be depressing about things - it's also plausible that rather than dying the valkyries who defended towns other than Anna were recovered by the UN much faster.

Like, it's amazingly bullshit that Anna held out in the middle of North America (where the UN wasn't even on the same continent) for something like 8 years, but it wouldn't be nearly as bullshit if another valkyrie protected some podunk eastern european town (just behind the front lines) for 6 months until the UN reestablished contact and spearheaded an evacuation mission.
 
And again, that just with 4 of 10 of those babies, gonna need yet another recalc when other 6 are remade and delivered.
I'm not sure Anna can re-fold them. The complexity got taken back up by Omni-sensors and a terawatt fusion reactor. Plus some for the newer weapon systems (HyV Cannons) and a bulking up of the surviving HPPs with bits from the ones that got broken.

Deadliness is arguably increased for any fight that continues past the recharge time of her previous HPP. Since the aforementioned fusion reactor lets her charge the HPPs up without spending Impeller or batteries to get power. Trading burst damage for sustainment.
 
I'm not sure Anna can re-fold them. The complexity got taken back up by Omni-sensors and a terawatt fusion reactor. Plus some for the newer weapon systems (HyV Cannons) and a bulking up of the surviving HPPs with bits from the ones that got broken.
Complexity isn't a hard limit, though. I'm pretty sure the issue would just be that they would take forever to integrate, not that it couldn't be done.
 
Like, it's amazingly bullshit that Anna held out in the middle of North America (where the UN wasn't even on the same continent) for something like 8 years, but it wouldn't be nearly as bullshit if another valkyrie protected some podunk eastern european town (just behind the front lines) for 6 months until the UN reestablished contact and spearheaded an evacuation mission.
It should be noted.
North American Enclosed settlement number twenty six (NA-E26) is the twenty sixth and most recent uncontacted settlement to be discovered on the North American continent.
That all known uncontacted settlements where in fact in North America. (I think their was even a joke about how the ones in America talked/joked about holding a presidential election now that a chunk of America is under human control).
 
Back
Top