Random Member
Gardener of Human Happiness
- Location
- Behind You
Nash does not discriminate.
Nash does not discriminate.
So I am curious. Suppose instead of the rhetoric about "colonizers" and "self-determination, the Romulan vote had been phrased this way. Same mechanical effect; different phrasing. Would people be voting any differently, or is it the rhetoric that is primarily influencing?
Please clarify - when you word it like you do, do you mean to imply that the FDS does NOT emphasize Federation values and does NOT provide geopolitical and historical data?So I am curious. Suppose instead of the rhetoric about "colonizers" and "self-determination, the Romulan vote had been phrased this way. Same mechanical effect; different phrasing. Would people be voting any differently, or is it the rhetoric that is primarily influencing?
[ ][ROM] Strongest push-back against Romulan interference.
[ ][ROM] Strong push-back against Romulan interference.
[ ][ROM] Modest push-back against Romulan interference.
[ ][ROM] No push-pack against Romulan interference.
I'd... probably either have voted the same way, or gone for:So I am curious. Suppose instead of the rhetoric about "colonizers" and "self-determination, the Romulan vote had been phrased this way. Same mechanical effect; different phrasing. Would people be voting any differently, or is it the rhetoric that is primarily influencing?
And escalating the situation now will certainly change their mind and strengthen their opposition.There is quite likely a significant portion of their political class that sees the Federation as something to remove, to say nothing of their extensive Deep State.
Just enough to keep the Romulans honest, not enough to scare them into thinking we're serious about conquering and subjugating the Arcadians.
Please clarify - when you word it like you do, do you mean to imply that the FDS does NOT emphasize Federation values and does NOT provide geopolitical and historical data?
A meeting takes place with yourself, the head of the Diplomatic Service, and the President. The President is staunchly in favour of blocking any Romulan attempts at spreading influence, but the DS are less gung-ho about the chances, and the willingness of the Federation members to get involved in what may easily become a bigger, uglier cousin to the Orion Syndicate campaigns. Both in talks with Romulan authorities on Athos, and in signal intercepts, it is clear that as much as Romulan scientists are always feverishly at work, the lessons of the "Inflictor" are still close to heart. There is little taste for superweapons and their unpredictability, and no taste for allowing the Licori to act irresponsibly. It poses the question, then. If the objective of the war was simply to end the reckless random acts of science, does the ultimate allegiance of the Arcadian Empire matter?
Romuls are gonna Romul. Like what are they going to do, go "Ah! Perfidious Federation, challenging us in the covert war we started! Those unscrupulous bastards!"And escalating the situation now will certainly change their mind and strengthen their opposition.
BTW is there a post outlining how the various phases work in the new combat engine somewhere? It'd be important for trying to design say, a skirmishing frigate or something.So people are aware:
https://forums.sufficientvelocity.c...hip-design-bureau-to-boldly-go.33039/page-136
I have put out a little invitation to create the next generation of Amarkian frigate(s). I hope to be doing this kind of thing a bit in future on that thread. If all goes well on this project, I'll consider allowing them to design the Laio's space fleets. Anyone is able to take part, designs chosen by QM on merit rather than popular vote though.
I don't perceive 'push-back' as neutral, and, to answer the original question no, I wouldn't have voted for another option.But the decisions themselves are phrased in a value-neutral way.
Following this line of thought results in Scott Linderly as Commander, Starfleet; you do realize that, don't you?In fact if you want MORE romulan friendship you should vote for the stronger pushback options because then they'll respect us more.
I get we had friendly funtimes we the Romulans during the biophage and there's an air of detente with the Romulans, but we should not consider them our friends or even allies. There is quite likely a significant portion of their political class that sees the Federation as something to remove, to say nothing of their extensive Deep State.
I do not think we should be 'fine' with handing them anything easily, especially the superscience madmen, especially since they don't seem very interested in subjugating other species. Why the Licori?
[X][PRIS] Exchange for the Ked Paddah Prisoners (-5pp from disgruntled Federation members, improved relations with Tartresis and Licori, +25 with Ked Paddah)
[X][ROM] To justify the costs, it is crucial that the Licori end up with a Federation-friendly government
[X][TALK] Flood the broadcasts
That would assume my thought process is 'befriend Romulans at all costs."Following this line of thought results in Scott Linderly as Commander, Starfleet; you do realize that, don't you?
They may have taken a closer look after the KP declared war, a few years later the Gaeni declared war shortly followed by the Federation, whose last war of aggression was declared - never before?The Romulans are also unnerved by the unstable mentats on their doorstep, and may be too paranoid to trust the Federation or anyone else to contain the threat properly.
If we send the Warmaster back, then most of what he says should synergies with the propaganda angle. He's had his first drink of the root beer.That wasn't seduction, that was geniuses talking shop about areas of interest.
I don't perceive 'push-back' as neutral, and, to answer the original question no, I wouldn't have voted for another option.
Imo, this is not our 'claim', neither is it our 'private issue'. I do have a problem with aggressive moves versus a political entity we just signed a non-aggression treaty with when they are looking after their own interests in an area we didn't claim. We fought the war to end a threat of extermination, not to conquer new territory.
You mean it isn't? Well, why not?!That would assume my thought process is 'befriend Romulans at all costs."
And that's where my perception of 'push-back' plays a role. Both sides arguing - no problem for me. The Romulans being Romulans (ie, supporting a favored faction, like we might do/have done with the Sydraxians) - not a fan, but I'd see no problem in countering Federation-style.The Federation and Romulans have exactly equal interests here.
In fact if you want MORE romulan friendship you should vote for the stronger pushback options because then they'll respect us more.