Eventually, I want to name another ship Thunderchild and Polyphemus, to carry on their legacy. Maybe the explorers or the utility cruisers.
Definitely an explorer. Enterprise may fly the flag of the Federation going forward, but Thunderchild will keep it planted so it may wave.
For the survey ship how about a sphere with a secondary hull? Lots of lab space, lots of crew space, lots of space for sample storage., lots of surface area for sensors.
Hull Type | Mass | Secondary Hull Options | Advantages | Disadvantages | Cost |
Full Saucer | 200,000 Tons | Inline/Ventral | Internal Space | Cost | 4 Industry |
Half-Saucer | 150,000 Tons | Ventral | Maneuverability | Internal Space | 3 Industry |
Sphere | 120,000 Tons | Inline | Cost | Defenses | 2 Industry |
We are at peace and the major powers of the sector are now coordinating patrols. The ship is gonna be pretty safe.
Fundamentally, I don't think this needs a heavy armament, so I think a sphere is the way to go. I'd like to mount a few phaser banks and at least one torpedo launcher (doubles for science probes), but we don't need more than 3. The upgrade to phasers instead of phase cannons should provide us the necessary self-defense capability, and we don't need much beyond that.
The Oberths ain't spheres, they're saucers with fuckin' hueg secondary hulls. Really, the saucer might be considered the secondary hull when it comes to an Oberth.[Sp..!]
A disembodied voice reminds you that Oberths like to explode mysteriously.
So, as I was saying, we should go for the half or full saucer.
Question for our GM: are the Type-1 phasers going to be available for prototyping on this ship?All these components (minus the phasers) are now gearing up for mass production
Since half-saucer has "internal space" as a disadvantage, shouldn't that mean that a sphere also has that as a disadvantage?The final option is a sphere, which will provide you with around the same internal space as a half saucer