I was just trying to say why is it a option then it probably is a good reason why it's there but now with that new information it just looks like fusion power solves the problems already so it's a option that people won't take because of the cost and doesn't serve the purpose of making energy since fusion just deals with that so why is it still there it's like having the option of building a new weapon that people a lot of people have major morality problems with when you have a weapon that they don't have a problem with and by the looks of it still can be upgraded a lot like and I just missing a ton of information or what?
It IS a good option.
There are a lot of potential uses for it, ranging from powering high energy density and compact thing such as weapons, vehicles, and even power armor if the need for it was high enough. So things like man-portable particle beam weapons, floating and shielded MARVs, Impractically large Steel talon walkers that have Adaptive armor permanently on and doesn't need to reduce rate of fire for weapon systems, and flight-capable power armor like Ironman are probably possible by combining Liquid Tiberium Fuel Cells with other energy-intensive technology.
Going by the description, it should also be a Fast form of power, as in quickly providing lots of energy with even less dice than Fusion, and potentially not even that expensive given how Tiberium is literally everywhere, and most of the costs will probably go into shielding it from malfunctions and intentional sabotage.
In that way, it should also be useful for emergencies for when a specific project or plan needs LOTS of power in the fastest time possible that no other option will provide.
But in the end, given the volatility and perceived dangers of any kind of Liquid-Tiberium technology, due to no small part of Director Boyle's detonation of the Liquid Tiberium in game canon history, most people, including the voters, would never go for it unless they ran out of other options first. Hell, they won't even try to develop it at least to see what potential it holds, and then properly judge whether or not it's worth using after seeing actual facts and solid data for the comparison against other forms of energy such as Fusion.
So yeah, I'd expect people to continue not voting for it due to the stigma it has alone, regardless of any potential benefits it had, simply because they just don't want to. It's not that hard to get it done, but until things are desperate enough to make people care to vote for it, it might as well not exist as a real option in my opinion.
I mean the irony is that I don't see people arguing against building more Tiberium processing facilities such as those that comes automatically with Tiberium mines and the planned cities with Tiberium processing, yet those are bound to be filled with Tiberium anyways, and probably partially in liquid form in far greater quantities than any Liquid Tiberium Fuel Cell will have for that matter while it's melting and processing raw Tiberium chunks. But that's simply life I suppose.