We can hit stations- Enterprise and Philly 4 and 5 get us to a bit over 4000, finishing the Columbia phases will knock us over 6000. Easily doable over 4 turns more so if we rush philly 5 to pick up a 4th dice in orbital (and another free dice) and another +7 to each dice. And Seo has +5 to station dice so it adds up quick.
Sure, but that requires us to actually have the dice available to do so. Which I'm worried that we might not if we need to pivot our focus into military to handle a major war with NOD.
A good laugh with this one too. This is the crazy religious guy who wants to implement a theocracy right? Is Salt Lake Planned City even a real project or is it just all in his head?
They do not count towards your promises.
Except that is fairly easy to hit without much in the way of free dice, more so as I mention Philly 2 makes hitting the goal even easier. As is I see a decent chance of finishing 3 stations and being well into the 4th by plan end even with free dice into mil.
Yeah why I add (Soc) and such after duplicate promises
This one though we might never hit in this plan, we have other cap good sources in HI (plus power rollout) and we want to spread our sources not put everything into one basket
Oh, we'll be wanting to do research/development projects regularly, I believe. Seo has... needs.
Is their? I mean unless we can tune the things to repel tib particles it seems like mainly a military advantage.
Because I've already got 80% of Parliament voting for the plan and don't need to go higher on abatement. Income is the big promise to get everybody on board and I don't want to load up beyond that. I expect we'll shoot right past 40 abatement in reality, but I don't want to PROMISE we'll hit 60 or 80 and then come up 1 point short. Same reason I'm not going higher on food or stations.
Yeah but stuff like 120 cons good and picking planned cities seems to be more of an issue with possibly coming up short than abatement (plus we can snag the reclamation party). Income by 800 also seems like it is pushing it a bit, since that means we have to keep on income increases long before swapping over to abatement projects.
The only disagreement I have with the entire plan is choosing 120 Consumer goods vs choosing 90 Capital goods. Because at least the Capital goods have their uses for other projects, but Consumer goods are essentially just end products that don't contribute to to the build up of economy, not to mention 90 Capital goods counts for 3 points while 120 Consumer goods are only counted by 2 points.
I see. Then yeah I'd be fully willing to vote for it. I'd even say it's much better plan than the previous 4-year plan, since no more unnecessary promises are made to increase risks without useful gains.
5 phases of arcolgoies seems to lock in our infra dice though (even if we might hit that going to 3 means we can drop to other housing if we need to for housing refugees also infra is used for planned cities and logistics). But we get that much passive? Oh my... okay that makes 120 a lot easier to hit.
