This is not how the project works. It is a subvote option in the results phase where I list out all your remaining plan commitments and alternatives/compromises.-[X] Request Reduction in Plan Commitments (Karachi) DC 120/160/200/240, DC 240 4 dice 24 PS 89%
I know, it's more to highlight it for people reading it.This is not how the project works. It is a subvote option in the results phase where I list out all your remaining plan commitments and alternatives/compromises.
Information about build times - 18 months minimum as opposed to 9 months minimum for frigates. I still think the battleship docks are worth doing now so they're in the water ASAP, but I agree that a near-term focus on frigates makes sense.But I'm sincerely curious, has any new information come to light regarding them that's kept everyone away from the idea? Like, new within the past twelve hours?
That 'one engineer' is the person giving +10 to all infrastructure rolls right? If yes, then wouldn't their opinion very much matter here if they only reason they joined was because Karachi was promised to them? Not upholding it when it IS possible to do seems disingenuous.one engineer throws a fit over their pet project being pushed back during a war.
I don't get this. If the Navy doesn't have the ships to protect as many convoys then the number of non-essential convoys should just drop, and not let civilian lives be risked by doing the same amount of convoys without sufficient protection. The Logistics should take a hit, not the people.It's either thousands of personnel dying because the navy won't be ready to support Karachi or less dying because we can actually detach the naval units needed to cover the landings properly.
That is a misreading. The 18 months is for the proper Escort Carrier class. Not the conversions. Conversions are more or less "in time for a 2061 Karachi" bundle.Information about build times - 18 months minimum as opposed to 9 months minimum for frigates. I still think the battleship docks are worth doing now so they're in the water ASAP, but I agree that a near-term focus on frigates makes sense.
I'm referring to the option to build escort carriers using existing battleship shipyards rather than new ones.That is a misreading. The 18 months is for the proper Escort Carrier class. Not the conversions. Conversions are more or less "in time for a 2061 Karachi" bundle.
Yes, but that wasn't what I was referring to, so it didn't really answer my question. I'd already figured on the light carriers (the purpose-built warship ones the Navy likes better) taking 12+ months to build, and 18 months doesn't surprise me at all.I'm referring to the option to build escort carriers using existing battleship shipyards rather than new ones.
Edit: They are shipyards and not docks.
That's what I'd thought.That is a misreading. The 18 months is for the proper Escort Carrier class. Not the conversions. Conversions are more or less "in time for a 2061 Karachi" bundle.
I'm... actually in agreement with Marids here. The question is whether military realities permit this.That 'one engineer' is the person giving +10 to all infrastructure rolls right? If yes, then wouldn't their opinion very much matter here if they only reason they joined was because Karachi was promised to them? Not upholding it when it IS possible to do seems disingenuous.
There are currently no plans with merchantman conversions. It might be welcome.But given the need for a viable navy with, y'know, enough hulls, I think the merchantman conversions are a practical necessity.
I think there's been a panic reaction catalyzed by a few outspoken people on the thread who are persistently against the idea.The consensus seems to be that Karachi 2061 is outright impossible or too risky. I don't think it is if we do carrier conversions, I'm just unsure if it's worth the risk and PS hit.
The beauty of what @uju32 showed us was possible with the "sprint to Karachi Phase 5 in two turns" is that the same plan is also a road map to sprint to Phase 4 in ONE turn. If we really want to.Though I'm definitely going to be looking at your plan eagerly Simon, because I've not given up on getting Karachi started this plan. Definitely don't think it'll be the 'Phase 5 done in two quarters' plan that was going around, but I'm willing to bite the bullet and get at least Phase 4 done. Both to achieve Plan Goals, and also because we really, really need to get some damn eyes on whatever the hell is going on in India. The longer we delay that, the more likely something horrifying comes out of there and completely surprises us during this war. Let alone after it.
i know rightTo be fair, frigates may be able to pull Governors or even CVNs off escort duty, but, if we want to do Karachi, we should definitely do the Merchantman Conversions this or next turn.
See, I'm disagreeing with your conclusion because I don't think your arguments lead to it.I'm all for accepting the fact that Karachi is a lost cause... Now is the time to do what we think is in the best interest of the Initiative, and winning this war- not following through on what were ultimately campaign promises so we can secure our position.