- Location
- his hidden lair
Which is why I gave it a hundred years to mature and the fact it could involve a far larger platform than a building a local commander can assemble on the spot. We have to assume the Rift Generator wasn't too hard for the Scrin to build considering it was ultimately a local tactical weapon.Specifically for this part, Scrin wormholes technology is both something quite powerful and has limitations which can be observed in the Campaign and battles. One infrastructure based wormholes are far cheaper and easier energy wise as we see them use it extensively to transport manufactured drones with the transmitted tiberium from the bases with those wormholes at net energy such them transporting buzzers, seekers and other vehicles, or to especially make a point create thresholds as it far easier to create a wormhole network across interstellar distances than it is for ship based ftl .
Two free standing wormholes are far more energy intensive in both consumption and maintenance, in which we see them creating those wormholes to reduce distance of ground forces continuously instead of using air transports both on a tactical scale on the battles, a strategic scale if Global Conquest depiction of Scrin wormholes is accurate, or possibly smaller scale if teleportation is not used to for the Summon Buzzers ability on the field, which is somewhat doubtful as we see shocktroopers use blink packs before.
Lastly we have seen freestanding wormholes being created to connect Earth and deep space, the Rift Generator of the Scrin which if looking at it from a mining perspective is basically a device specialized in creating freestanding wormholes in the solar system, possibly to transport things in space. The rift Generator as we saw consumes much energy for the Creation of a short wormhole in deep space and likely has the limitation of taking much more energy the further away the wormhole is away from the generator, meaning attempting to as you say shunt stellar plasma would be extremely difficult for the Scrin and nearly impossible for GDI to do with Wormhole tech being far more primitives' than Scrin.
Even if we needed to build infrastructure to basically call in a distant enough wormhole right on top of it, the Scrin could easily still find the idea threatening.
Likewise, there's probably more to it than just creating a wormhole to deep space because the difference in pressure wouldn't actually be that destructive in its own right. Certainly not equivalent to nuclear weapons.
I think the presence of NOD is the biggest wrinkle in that train of thought. Especially if as we become more dependent on STUs we become more vulnerable to catalyst weaponry or NOD's Catalyst weaponry becomes more advanced in general. There's also the possibility that if we can refine Tib into STUs and then process those into hardware without touching down on Earth it'll probably be fairly harder for NOD to infiltrate that supply chain than a terrestrial one. The military situation might very well make secure access to strategic resources more important than maximizing the amount of strategic resources. Think about how much that's a potential bargaining chip if it ever comes down to negotiating with Kane for a TCN. If getting people off world is threatening, securing access to Tib off world is pretty damning. So our differences really come to, is how out of the way in NOD in this scenario? Because you're probably right in that if GDI has a hegemony over Earth Venus is less attractive, but I think there's a window between winning the Regency War and getting Kane to the negotiating table where it's a potential possibility.I get the logic.
The countervailing point is mostly about the scale of megaproject required to make Venusian tiberium accessible to GDI's industry when Earth has prodigious amounts of tiberium, arguably more than we could imagine using even in a very very hungry 'om nom nom' green rock eating economy. And Earthly tiberium is both easier to access even ignoring transportation issues (because "at the bottom of the Venusian atmosphere" makes even tiberium nastier to work with), and right there in that it's directly plugged into the economy of Earth where we keep most of our stuff.
It's going to be hard for GDI to justify large scale deployment of tiberium harvesting hardware on Venus when for the same expense outlay we could probably harvest ??? times more tons of tiberium from the Red Zones of the Earth itself. Sure, we could probably do shit like plunk down growth accelerators on Venus, but here on Earth we don't need that, not yet and not soon. There's still more tiberium than we know what to do with (literally), and in the notional scenario under discussion, Nod will have mostly gotten out of the way.
...
This is why I think GDI is only likely to invest in large scale harvesting of Venusian tiberium after:
1) Earth is largely evacuated and we're a spacefaring civilization dealing with the reality that Earth and Venus are about equally habitable ("Plan B" scenarios, c. 2100 or later).
2) Earthly tiberium is firmly under control and still around in the wake of a successful TCN construction, with Kane gone and one of GDI's main concerns being to stabilize the tiberium situation on Venus.
3) Earthly tiberium has outright vanished and we're forced to mine Venus for more tiberium by default.
Until at least one of those conditions is fulfilled, I just can't think of any situation where GDI would invest, say, 30 dice and 600-900 R into building up infrastructure to mine tiberium on Venus when it could do the same on Earth for higher probable return on investment.
Moreover, I think even in the scenario you describe we wouldn't be investing all that much in Lunar or Martian mining for the same reasons. It's probably even less lucrative than Venusian mining from some perspectives while still failing to create a secure supply chain of STUs.
Last edited: