Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
Romance is not defined, not the way you seem to be trying to.
It's two people dedicating themselves to each other, no matter what form that dedication may take.
That's what I was focusing on, actually. So if I was trying to 'define romance' with my wordings, then so's this, sorta.

True, I'm thinking about and placing value in being able to have a normal human relationship with a person, yeah. In being able to live and share life. And to me, that entails certain things, like having the person able to care for you in life or have your back and so on.

Hmmm... I would say that it would be closer to have used the word "relationship" rather than "romance", in that sentence of "Romance is not defined, not the way you seem to be trying to." A relationship can be many different things and ways. Romance is a bit more specific or defined or particular.

So, I guess that's what I'm seeing in DragonParadox's posts and objecting to, I suppose. He's wanting a relationship or interaction. But he wants to call it a romance, too. And I guess I object to that a bit. As romance would mean more than just those things that you'd get from that kind of relationship.

Though speaking of care and caring about another person... Yeah, that's another of my hesitations about this. I feel somebody like Johann or Panoramia or Anton would care for us more, and more easily and naturally, then somebody who's a total question mark and is a dragon rather than a human. Shared experiences, culture, values, shared life. We've got all that with those three. We're already friends with them. The dragon's a total stranger, and I don't like that. (Yes, yes I know, 'But if we do our best to understand him, then he won't be a stranger!' I still don't like it. It's moving away/on from people we know, and already trust and care for, in order to poke at and explore somebody else.) Honestly, I think the dragon is more like an interesting mystery to explore, potentially a friend or associate, rather than a partner.
That. You know emotional, physical, and probably but not necessarily, Sexual intimacy.

So yeah, while he might ahve been better of adding some "I feel" 's and "In my opinions" 's and all that, I think he has a legitimate point.
That plus, just, "Will this person have my back in my life in general?" Will they provide support and care. Will they be a partner.

It doesn't even have to be them having specific skills for situations like "Well if you're caught up in magic politics, what the hell is Anton or Oswald going to be good for then, huh?" I mean, that we could go to them or confide to them or just know that they have our backs in some way.

Of course, various people bring varieties and skills and abilities here. Max would have our back in research and academia. Panoramia would be able to provide healing and food. Johann would be able to sneak and fight alongside us, the crazy bastard.
So yeah, while he might ahve been better of adding some "I feel" 's and "In my opinions" 's and all that, I think he has a legitimate point.
Well, I mean, I'm already putting a lot of parts where I go "I think" or "I feel" or hemming and hawing and "Hmmm..."s in my posts.

(And even then sometimes just getting told "But that's just your opinion, of course. You have a particular view of romance. Others may think differently." Well, I mean, yes. Yes, those're my opinions or feelings. The posts themselves even already say this. Do I have to be even more "IMO" in my posting??)

EDIT: Heck I mean, so much of my posting is tentative and rough and couched in cautious or personal terms or musings that... I don't even know, man.

EDIT 2, after internet hiccup: Obviously these are my opinions, sure. But, I mean... equally obviously, I would not be sharing them if I didn't think I had a point or was right (or more right) in some way. =/
 
Last edited:
Hey @BoneyM , I've forgotten the exact date, but shouldn't the results for the experiment with feeding the livestock the Moulder goop be coming back soon?

2486, according to my whiteboard.

How did it turn out that Mathilde is just surrounded by people who are fed up with the elves? The Dwarves are fed up with the elves. Cython is fed up with elves. The Eonir and Asarnil are fed up with other elves. Wilhemina, Heidi and probably most of our imperial friends are increasingly fed up with elves over Marienburg.

With the exception of our invitation to the least Asur of the 10 kingdoms, I don't think Mathilde has ever a positive interaction regarding the Asur of Ulthuan.

The average Elf is fed up with at least nine kingdoms of Elves.

@BoneyM
Have we uh... informed the Ice Dragon of the We? Or vice versa? It occurred to me and it feels like a very big gap to leave.

No, but the We don't generally go above ground and Cython doesn't go below it unless given good reason.
 
The average Elf is fed up with at least nine kingdoms of Elves.
Hm. How many of the other imperial state provinces is the average Imperial fed up with, in comparison? :V :p

Although I started off asking that semi-jokingly, I suppose it does work as a question about the topic of how the Imperials feel about their fellows, and what inter-empire tensions and relationships are like. I know that it's not perfectly harmonious of course -- not nearly, hah -- but how are inter-Empire tensions and relations going? (Or do we, bluntly, simply do not know enough about this -- and don't spend enough time and focus on the Empire to warrant such?)
 
Well if Romance is not defined, then what's the purpose of having it as a word? Also you literally define Romance Yourself, right after you say that it is not defined.
Okay, perhaps I should have been clearer. It has no specific definition. Romance, for all that there's a general "meaning", has near infinite forms and, from an outside perspective, may not even look like romance at all. I know if someone looked at some of the people in my family and their relationships, they wouldn't believe it was real. It's like trying to define love. Everybody would have a different answer. In fact, I even clarify in the quoted post—you know that bit you skipped over when underlining?—that it can't be defined the way they are trying. but sure. Maybe my particular idea of romance isn't accurate either. I'll admit that.
But to discuss the definition, I'd have to disagree with your idea that Romance involves being "Dedicated", People will claim to have a night of wild Romance with someone, before never seeing them again, just one night of passion and all that. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to call platonic relationships invalid or anything of the sort. But I do think Garlak might have the more mainstream view of Romance here, as I do expect most people, when they voted Yes Romance, were expecting some level of you know:
That. You know emotional, physical, and probably but not necessarily, Sexual intimacy.

So yeah, while he might ahve been better of adding some "I feel" 's and "In my opinions" 's and all that, I think he has a legitimate point.
Passion and romance are two very different things. But that's getting into semantics and about as difficult to argue as "what is love", so I'll leave off. And sure, Garlak has their preferences—I even share some, being an avid fan of Panoramia and Roswita myself—but the "point" they are trying to make is that romance only takes the form they prefer, and that a relationship based on intellectual discourse and scientific discovery isn't really romantic. That is something I disagree with wholeheartedly.
I don't know, maybe I stepped into a conversation I shouldn't have, and misunderstood something. But reading the comments again, I'm seeing: "passion and interest in someone's otherworldly nature/intelligence totally counts as a romantic interest" followed by "No, that sounds aromantic and like you just want to do cool magical research, so stop trying to say it's romance". And that made me stop and stare, because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, especially when the "that's not romantic" person also says "so stop blocking off romance for other people who want it". When, you know, they're the one trying to tell someone a certain option isn't romantic.
 
Hm. How many of the other imperial state provinces is the average Imperial fed up with, in comparison? :V :p

Although I started off asking that semi-jokingly, I suppose it does work as a question about the topic of how the Imperials feel about their fellows, and what inter-empire tensions and relationships are like. I know that it's not perfectly harmonious of course -- not nearly, hah -- but how are inter-Empire tensions and relations going? (Or do we, bluntly, simply do not know enough about this -- and don't spend enough time and focus on the Empire to warrant such?)

Most provinces have negative stereotypes about the others, but unless there's an active cause of tension like between Middenland and Nordland they generally get along. 'They aren't as good as people from our province, but they're preferable to Kislevites/Bretonnians/Tileans/Estalians and much better than Norscans/Marauders/Orcs/Beastmen' sort of thing.
 
Honestly, I think the dragon is more like an interesting mystery to explore, potentially a friend or associate, rather than a partner.

I don't know - Cython seems to really want to learn stuff in order to make a relationship work. Like more than anyone else. Then there's thoughtful gifts and a willingness to place themselves into a relatively vulnerable position for Mathilde's comfort.

Those are pretty good signs - there's a very good potential for a relationship here.
 
How do people feel about getting one last use out of Qrech? Set him free with a sack of warpstone near clan Moulder. Put our matrix in him and tell him if the dwarf expedition is attacked by clan Moulder we will kill him from a distance. He might stop any attacks or he might not, but either way it costs us very little.
 
Last edited:
How do people feel about getting one last uses out of Qrech? Set free with a sack of warpstone near clan Moulder. Put our matrix in him and tell him if the dwarf expedition is attacked by clan Moulder we will kill him from a distance. He might stop any attacks or he might not, but either way it costs us very little.
I feel that it's unnecessary, unlikely to be succeed, and has the potential to be harmful to Mathilde, the expedition, and the Conspiracy of Silence. So, no, I wouldn't be in favor of such an action. Best to just let him grow old and pass away in peace, as a reward for his unknowing contributions in combating his kind.
 
Okay, perhaps I should have been clearer. It has no specific definition. Romance, for all that there's a general "meaning", has near infinite forms and, from an outside perspective, may not even look like romance at all. I know if someone looked at some of the people in my family and their relationships, they wouldn't believe it was real. It's like trying to define love. Everybody would have a different answer. In fact, I even clarify in the quoted post—you know that bit you skipped over when underlining?—that it can't be defined the way they are trying. but sure. Maybe my particular idea of romance isn't accurate either. I'll admit that.
I didn't highlight that bit, but I did read it. I'll admit I should have included the underline, but I left it out for a visual break between the two bits. Which I could have accomplished with separate quotes in hindsight.

But my thought was more, You seemed to be telling him that he can't define Romance that way, then you defined Romance this way. Does that make sense? Like you seemed to be telling him he can't do something, that you then proceed to do?

I'm not even going to say that you're wrong there, just that, as I looked on from outside the discussion, it seemd that those two sentences should not be keeping each other company. They seemed Dissonant to me.

I don't know, maybe I stepped into a conversation I shouldn't have, and misunderstood something.
Firstly, you stepped over no lines, he gave his opinion in a public forum, thus (IMO) you are automatically allowed to provide your opinion in a polite manner. And your response seemed polite and thought out, so I'd say you were good to go there. (As if I'm the arbitrator of who can say what and where :p)

Passion and romance are two very different things.
I agree that they are two different things, but I was arguing with your specific notion that:
It's two people dedicating themselves to each other
It required dedication. many healthy relationships and Romances do involve to people dedicating themselves to each other, but not all Romances do in my opinion, that's what I was trying to say there.

but the "point" they are trying to make is that romance only takes the form they prefer, and that a relationship based on intellectual discourse and scientific discovery isn't really romantic. That is something I disagree with wholeheartedly.
I don't feel that was their intent, but this:
But don't block off romance and intimacy for the people that want romance and intimacy. Which is what drawing such a separation and definition would be.
This area where I think he would have been served well more of a "I feel that by classifying this platonic(in Garlaks opinion) seeming research partnership as a Romance, that it might end up leaving out people who very much wanted a Physical/Sexual/whatever Romance" Because as it stands, I do see how you get this:

I'm seeing: "passion and interest in someone's otherworldly nature/intelligence totally counts as a romantic interest" followed by "No, that sounds aromantic and like you just want to do cool magical research, so stop trying to say it's romance". And that made me stop and stare, because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, especially when the "that's not romantic" person also says "so stop blocking off romance for other people who want it". When, you know, they're the one trying to tell someone a certain option isn't romantic.
Out of what he said. But in Garlaks defense, DP did sort of start with the very Definitive "This is how it is" language.
The dragon as a romantic pursuit is about fascination with magic, it's about wanting to be part of something great and terrible, a history older than the whole of mankind, it is about the little blurb next to Mathilde's learning score: The magical world makes more sense to you than the 'real' one.
When I can safely bet money, that there are just some people in the thread that want one more dragon bone in Mathilde's life.
 
How do people feel about getting one last use out of Qrech? Set him free with a sack of warpstone near clan Moulder. Put our matrix in him and tell him if the dwarf expedition is attacked by clan Moulder we will kill him from a distance. He might stop any attacks or he might not, but either way it costs us very little.
He would tell them that we've deciphered Queekish.
 
Passion and romance are two very different things. But that's getting into semantics and about as difficult to argue as "what is love", so I'll leave off. And sure, Garlak has their preferences—I even share some, being an avid fan of Panoramia and Roswita myself—but the "point" they are trying to make is that romance only takes the form they prefer, and that a relationship based on intellectual discourse and scientific discovery isn't really romantic. That is something I disagree with wholeheartedly.
I don't know, maybe I stepped into a conversation I shouldn't have, and misunderstood something. But reading the comments again, I'm seeing: "passion and interest in someone's otherworldly nature/intelligence totally counts as a romantic interest" followed by "No, that sounds aromantic and like you just want to do cool magical research, so stop trying to say it's romance". And that made me stop and stare, because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, especially when the "that's not romantic" person also says "so stop blocking off romance for other people who want it". When, you know, they're the one trying to tell someone a certain option isn't romantic.
I think some misunderstanding probably took place, yeah. Passion and interests in somebody's magic or nature could count, yeah, just... It's hard to express exactly. I guess it's more like an objection to the selected person, the dragon, specifically. That, to use an example or comparison, if it were passion and interest in Gilding or restoring the Caldera to life or waystones or maybe artillery or pets or whatever, it could work -- because those people would be Johann or Panoramia or Oswald. But there'd be more there, too. (i.e. If it were Max or Oswald or Kazrik or Gotri in the place here, and somebody was making the argument of wanting to get close to them over shared academic interest or interests in artillery or interests in runesmithing or curiosity about engineering... I'd shrug and go sure. But because it's the dragon, that's gets a 'No, because...' from me.) (Because I feel that those people, even if chosen to be approached for/from that particular reason... there'd still be more and other stuff, like the stuff I was sort of trying to define or explain, there too.)

And for the second paragraph... Well it's sort of like... If you want to explore otherworldly nature and magic and stuff, you still can do that even if the dragon doesn't win the romance vote. (Because, behold how many people would still be interested in pursuing that sort of stuff even afterwards. One of my posts -- maybe the same one -- said that too.) But if the humans lost the vote then if you want to pursue intimacy or a family or emotional closeness or sex still, then... you see the issue there, right?
I don't know - Cython seems to really want to learn stuff in order to make a relationship work. Like more than anyone else. Then there's thoughtful gifts and a willingness to place themselves into a relatively vulnerable position for Mathilde's comfort.

Those are pretty good signs - there's a very good potential for a relationship here.
Relationship and friendship, sure. I mean, I'd bet a lot of posters would be interested in knowing more about the dragon. Romance, I don't agree on.

I mean. It's like Kragg. He's inexplicably (or explicably :p) really popular despite being 10 tons of grumbly curmudgeonness, and everybody's curious about him, to the point where BoneyM commented that he'd decided to slow the roll on the Kragg and Belegar options a bit, because otherwise everyone would pick those options every turn.

And yet, I would not see Kragg as a romance target. At all. Grumpy uncle, yeah. Romance, erk, no. Belegar, maybe. The age difference there isn't too godawful bad, for Dwarf and Human ages/maturities. A relationship and connection is there. But there would be some serious problems and difficulties there, practical issues. Needing to marry and have children, needing to meet expectations or traditions, culture, etc. Mathilde being a wizard, and him a Dwarf King. But at least, it would feel possible or plausible or sensible or just... sort of, in my opinion, I could go see people going "Yeah, I guess I could see it?" Kragg though. Personalities and histories and age and positions and everything. Most people, despite the memeing and joking about it, probably would not go for that.
But my thought was more, You seemed to be telling him that he can't define Romance that way, then you defined Romance this way. Does that make sense? Like you seemed to be telling him he can't do something, that you then proceed to do?

I'm not even going to say that you're wrong there, just that, as I looked on from outside the discussion, it seemd that those two sentences should not be keeping each other company. They seemed Dissonant to me.
So we both might have had people looking in on the conversation and going 'Huh, that person seems to be saying Do X/Don't Do X.' :V Heh. Perspectives and words, man.

I fret a lot about how my words will be taken, and try to talk a lot or couch things and etc, but it still gets into things anyway. Plus, then, some topics or debate-points being more solid rather than soft and so on...

But, thank you very much for the defense man. :) Feeling a lot less nervous and worried because of it.
This area where I think he would have been served well more of a "I feel that by classifying this platonic(in Garlaks opinion) seeming research partnership as a Romance, that it might end up leaving out people who very much wanted a Physical/Sexual/whatever Romance" Because as it stands, I do see how you get this:
Huh, yes, nice! I think this probably gets to what I was trying to say or express more! (But fumbled it. And even as I was writing and posting it, I felt like I fumbled it, but went 'I can't make it any better; might as well post anyway and leave it up to the fates and fortune anyway and just pray.')

This also then explains how/why I could make the statement of "I think you're/you'd stop others from getting X" too, (without sounding hypocritical or double-standard-y) right? Because from my perspective, he can already/probably get all/most of what he wants... but if others wanted more, they'd be losing out. Whereas if people got the other kind of thing, then the thing DragonParadox wanted, would still be possible and achievable for him. Though I then sort of extended things into talking more about what romance is or is not (again) and then things proceeded from there and here we are...
How do people feel about getting one last uses out of Qrech? Set free with a sack of warpstone near clan Moulder. Put our matrix in him and tell him if the dwarf expedition is attacked by clan Moulder we will kill him from a distance. He might stop any attacks or he might not, but either way it costs us very little.
I'm not sure that's a very workable idea. He most likely would seek to get the suicide-collar-equivalent removed from him. He might be flatly unable to do anything, have any influence, in Clan Moulder. Plus, just releasing him there means drawing attention to things going on there. Also also, this doesn't seem quite like Mathilde's style or methods of doing things... It doesn't exactly build on the approaches she's taken before, and instead is a big "Do this or you explode" thing.

Also, worst of all, Qrech knows that he gave us (Low) Queekish (and Skaven writing). Even if he thinks that we already knew it, if he shares the information with anybody, that might eventually get back to the wrong ears. He's a security/secrecy issue basically.
Best to just let him grow old and pass away in peace, as a reward for his unknowing contributions in combating his kind.
Yeah. Though... I'd like to be able to do something more, or socialize with him in some way, still. I'd like to read more about him, basically. Once in a while or etc. (Though, some people wrote sidestories or short fictions about him, so that counts. Like him playing out the battle of Drakenhof, that was a cool idea.)

I am not, however, sure of how that would be possible. What possible scene ideas are there? The current 'Qrech Gambits', well some of them don't appeal to me, as they involve releasing him, or... Hmm, well, one of them just says "Nobody knows you're alive, so you should... etcetc". But that one makes me think and wonder. Because, for one thing, is that one really a lie? Is that something we'd need to use the Deception Coin on? And secondly... what would come of it? Where would we go from there?
 
Last edited:
Actually, I guess that sort of sounds like I'm expressing an interest in spending a Social AP on Qrech, huh?

Which... Actually yeah. You know what could be a viable Social Action topic, for him?

Going over what things and classes he's learned from Altdorf University
.

I'm actually interested in reading more about that, now that I've verbalized it. It feels interesting and cool.

...

Huhm. Qrech learning more about human culture. (Or, well, at least human academic culture. In miniature.) That, too, could be absolutely fascinating.

Hell, morality or philosophy discussions with him could be interesting, too. What does loyalty and dedication mean to a Skaven, and to a human?

Because I've gotten the impression that... to a Skaven, they're still loyal to Skavendom, because, like... Because they think that the Skaven are powerful enough -- with their unmatched industry and warptech, and their magic and sheer numbers -- thaaat... they effectively can't be wiped out. They are not in a "delicate" place in the world. And even if they lose, even if their attempts get stymied, or even if they get hurt... they can still retreat and recover. And they will not lose too many things, nor lose too many of their advantages, at all ever. (Well I mean. Perhaps Chaos or Dawi Zharr might steal some of their tech, and then things would be a bit problematic for them. But aside from that, they're mostly good and secure, right.)

Skavenkind is not at risk of extinction or irrelevance in the world
. Skaven kind is not at risk of "losing" "badly" to the rest of the world. The only thing in question... is how quickly or how well they can win. It is a simple confidence in the state of existence, and power, of your nation and people.

So therefore, the main concern becomes... 'How can I get the biggest piece of the pie? How can my Clan do best?' Or 'How can I fulfill or reach my desires or ambitions, or my personal close group's ambitions and desires, best?'

And that's the Skaven outlook.
 
Well, there's also the thing about which standards you're judging them by? I'd argue that Max is just as integral to Mathilde's achievements in the Karak, except most people don't think of shared academic experiences and insights as "adventures." To be fair, Mathilde regards academia and research as "something that has to be done" rather than anything particularly stimulating.
Well to be fair I braught up Johann being our adventuring buddy because Roswita and Panoramia stans where touting their academic achivements and/or ambitions as reasons they where well suited to Mathilde and Johann wasn't. So I wanted to point out how Johann compliments us in a different way.
 
And I have to say, I really, really liked Roswita in this last. Her giggle, her sly asides to Mathilde, her academic debut, even the way she mentions that she was a college student to imply she was a party girl before confessing otherwise- it felt like she came in trusting Mathilde as the person who was on her side and had her back. Which is cool, in that she has a TON of natural allies at a place like this and she conspired against them with us. (So to speak.) It feels like such an honest, unconscious gesture of closeness that I'm really touched by it.
I feel it too. I'm not sure whether it's proto-sisterly or proto-loverly, but it's definitely very charming.

I think... that the most important thing about a romantic partner, would be... if they care about you and have your back and be there for you. This remains true for family and close friends, and it remains true for potential love interests too.

Not, 'how interesting they are as a character.' Not, 'how impressive they are as a mage or person or repository of history or mystery.'

But how much emotionally invested they can get in you. Can you go to them for comfort? Can you bring your problems to them and be confident in knowing that they'll care about them and try to help you with them or lend a listening ear, or at least be able to understand and care about your problems? Do you share enough culture and norms to naturally understand or just sorta-easily-get, on a simple and ground-base level, what is going on in the other being's head emotionally very easily?

...But most important of all, is "Will this person cherish and love you?" We can go to, for example, Anton or Johann or Regimand or maybe even Roswita with some of our problems or issues or doubts, and expect them to care about them off the bat, just because of who we and they are. That's good. Even if a Grey Wizard wounds up keeping lots of secrets and doesn't share everything, the fact is still important that those things that aren't super-secret-agent-classified can be shared.
This this this this. All of this. So much all of this.

Will this person cherish you and be a partner to you? Do they have your back?

That is what you really, really want to look for in a long term relationship.

Do you have the same rough expected age or lifespan, or at minimum would "a hundred years" be a significant chunk of their life? Can you live in the same society or household together? Look, these are very simple and practical and comfortable fundamental ideas.
To be fair, I'd give, say, an elf a pass for that, maybe, depending on the elf. At least enough to consider them, if they met the "do they have your back" test. Even if the relationship cannot possibly last more than a tiny fraction of their lifespan- do they have your back, while it lasts?

An elf, I could see being equipped to do that. To relate to a human being and care about how they feel and take them seriously as a person. It's not the normal way of elves to humans but it's not impossible.

A dragon? I dunno.

I think the dragon's an interesting person. And knows lots of interesting stuff. I'd be interested in hearing more about their life, more about magic, and so on. But as a romantic partner or someone to love? No.

Physical intimacy is what I was talking about, not temperature. Being able to sleep in the same bed. Being able to work in the same house. Being able to pick a person up and carry them in your arms if they're tired or sleepy or hurt. Being able to hug your kids.
Yeah, all of this.

You realize that applies equally to Roswita or Anton? Maybe their insights into Mathilde's character are less than Pan's because they don't interact with her as often as the K8P magic club does as a whole, but they do tick the other boxes.
Yeah, I do realize it, and those are points in Roswita's and Anton's favor. The big difference is, I don't know if Mathilde would be happy and comfortable going back to Stirland to live out the rest of her life, or even a large fraction of her time for the rest of her life. I'm pretty sure she'd be happy at Karak Eight Peaks.

But it's actually a point in Roswita and Anton's favor for me, that they're grounded enough in the ordinary world to give Mathilde a sense of "something to come home to."
 
Voting is open
Back
Top