Isn't overwork on T44? I think you might have to swap the order of your last two turn plans around.
Isn't overwork on T44? I think you might have to swap the order of your last two turn plans around.
I don't see a reason to delay the overwork, we could use it to capture a second apparition for example (if the Apparition binding worked and we think that two wouldn't be too much) to give our new spell a lot more punch and split the Elfication into two turns instead.I'm intentionally not using the Overwork action, so we can use it on:
I don't see a reason to delay the overwork, we could use it to capture a second apparition for example (if the Apparition binding worked and we think that two wouldn't be too much) to give our new spell a lot more punch and split the Elfication into two turns instead.
Oh hey Omegahugger, haven't seen you in a while."Obviously"? You fool! Through the Liber Mortis, all things are possible!
I miss Omegahugger.
We're doing the Foundation right now, so it's possible that we could get a prototype done this turn. Not necessarily likely, but quite possible - we thought that the Rune and the Capstone might take more than one action each to get prototypes for, and they didn't. So maybe next turn we will have the Build A Waystone action available, which would allow us to reasonably put Everyone in it. I don't think anyone would complain if that's the single Waystone action we did the entire turn - if there's anything that deserves the full attention of the whole group, it'd be that.
It's worth keeping in mind that the difficulty of the spell increases directly with how many Apparitions are bound to it:I don't see a reason to delay the overwork, we could use it to capture a second apparition for example (if the Apparition binding worked and we think that two wouldn't be too much) to give our new spell a lot more punch and split the Elfication into two turns instead.
Adding a second Rider in Red to the spell would be my personal limit.1. Yes. Controlling two is twice as hard as controlling one.1. Does the difficulty increase/safety decrease with multiple apparitions, 3 is riskier than 2, etc.
Do we need to get good at it?Thinking about it, let's say we agreed that necromancy is a-ok and there's no problem with doing it.
Would we be willing to spare the AP to get good at it?
This would be the QM's headache when writing it, but, narratively, how does this actually work? "I've never done this before in practice, but since I have perfect theoretical knowledge, I won't fail this attempt" sounds remarkably BS for a story that attempts to hew as close to reality as it can.Do we need to get good at it?
I'm pretty sure we've got a higher bonus to casting Necromancy than we do Ulgu.
I hesitate to ever say that the thread is 'done' with a discussion.Oh, are we done talking about gods and old ones? I went to bed and woke up to like 30 pages of discussion and gave up partway through lol.
At this point our knowledge of Necromancy is basically our Dangerous Forbidden Technique Powerup.Do we need to get good at it?
I'm pretty sure we've got a higher bonus to casting Necromancy than we do Ulgu.
I expect the main reason Boney was willing to give us a whole +20 to wielding Dhar is that he doesn't expect us to actually use it.At this point our knowledge of Necromancy is basically our Dangerous Forbidden Technique Powerup.
"Forgive me, Master. Just this once...I'll have to go all out." Mathilde, as most Shadowmancers, went through a chuunibyou phase when she was younger. She's never quite let go of her desire to use some lines in earnest.
At this point our knowledge of Necromancy is basically our Dangerous Forbidden Technique Powerup.
I struggle to see a connection.Could Vlad's notes on Carstein's Ring have any insights that would be useful when binding apparitions?
Oh, are we done talking about gods and old ones? I went to bed and woke up to like 30 pages of discussion and gave up partway through lol.
So...hypothetically...We can still improve further, too - there's W'Soran's prophecies, Vlad's notes on the Ring, in-person observation of Druchii spellcasting during the Elfcation...
For the record, here's our current rep:College Rep is different from Dwarf Rep. It's more a measure of achievements and academic visibility than how much they like you. Hitting double digits mean you're someone to watch, hitting about forty would be where most Wizards who pay attention to other Orders have heard of you. Most Patriarchs and Matriarchs would have triple digits.
We are, at this point, one of the most well-known members of the Colleges. Actually, given everything, I think we're the most well-known member of the Grey College period.
We serve a valuable function in the ecosystem of the Grey Order. Being the fabulous and well-known super-spy James Bond who draws attention means that all the other spies have more cover, because obviously they're not a Grey Wizard spy, we know what Grey Wizard spies are like and they're like that maniac Mathilde Weber! And so the rest of MI6 gets to do their job with less concern, because James Bond misleads the world by the fact of his existence. It's a misdirection trick on the level of an organization; I assume that in every generation they cultivate a super-spy or two, because it's so damn useful to the rest of the Order.It feels like an immense accomplishment, though I can't help but also feel that "most recognizable ninja" means we're a really shitty ninja.
Well, we can always get that arcane mark to make everyone forget our face to solve that!It feels like an immense accomplishment, though I can't help but also feel that "most recognizable ninja" means we're a really shitty ninja.
It feels like an immense accomplishment, though I can't help but also feel that "most recognizable ninja" means we're a really shitty ninja.