It is whataboutism because you're taking my statement and twisting it to another situation I was never arguing for. I said it was overconfidence for one thing to happen and you barge in to say "but what about the risk entailed with...". I was merely pointing out the sheer hubris that the thread was building itself up for, not arguing one way or the other.
OK fine:
It is sheer hubris to think we could survive a single second longer of letting Drycha live to have the first move, she will definitely murder us dead if we choose any option than leader
The above is an exaggerated version of my argument that I do not believe fully, but hopefully you can now see what I mean when I say that the argument of 'I think this is overconfidence' is indistinguishable from 'I think this is too risky' and can therefore be countered with 'I think not doing this is risky'
I hope this does not come off as overly pedantic, but I felt I needed to make my position clear.