Remove ads

Warhammer Fantasy: Divided Loyalties - an Advisor's Quest

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Reader mode
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
 
Nix's Warden said:
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork.

Guys we can get SO. MUCH. FAVOR. if we tell the dwarves we literally mugged one of the greenskin's gods.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
And how do you propose we prove it?

It just gets skepticism at worst, issues with the people who could be key political components in getting elevated in the College, and alienate the humans because Ranald. But we CAN prove we killed a damn Warboss and destroyed the almost Rogue Idol by dint of previous accomplishments and the devastation in the temple.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss and the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol.

[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] This is a matter between Wizards, and while you're not of the Jade Order and cannot directly punish her, etiquette dictates that you report this matter to them.

I think this warrants both tbh, but I'll settle for one or the other.

[X] The Citadel should be destroyed before we can consider our position secure.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
[X] Taking Kvinn-Wyr would mean we have every Karag flanking the Eastern Valley.

Either do something about the citadel, or take the last Karag we need to fortify this position completely.
 
Last edited:
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.

Panoramia has been a good underling. So cutting her some slack should be fine. Kinda want to do the harsh lecture her but with no actual punishment though due to how amusing it sounds.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.

Codrin's archers need boot training for their weak effort, not that it matters but for the future yeah.
 
Last edited:
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
[X] The death of the Warboss and the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork.


[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
-[X] Warn her that you will not be as lenient a second time.
I'm not sure the subvote here is needed, or even applicable unless the expedition continues on. That said, I think it's important to frame this as "you get one warning" rather than just lecturing her like it was a minor thing.

[X] The job is done. Ale and riches for everybody.

EVA-Saiyajin said:
How does one even explain the weakening of Mork absent Ranald's part without outright lying?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
"Mork committed power directly, and when I intervened he lost it, perhaps permanently. I was able to make sure it didn't explode me or the mountain, but it did seem to irritate the local greenskins. And Mork, if him smashing his own side for not killing us all is any indication."
 
Last edited:
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.

Ranald seem like the "control form the shadows" type. While he wouldn't mind if we sing him praises. I doubt the Dwarves will care that Ranald is strengthened since they don't worship human gods as they have dwarven gods of their own. So telling them about Ranald is kinda useless.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
 
I want to talk about the weakening of Mork because that opens up discussion on why the Greenskins suddenly freaked out, and thats strategically important.
Ranald doesn't need to be mentioned, nobody in the council wants to hear about magical technicalities, only that the power was removed, and that the cause was a Greenskin heresy dividing their twin gods.

It fits the understanding of all involved.
 
Not to mention pissing off Dwarves by bringing up the Dawi Zhar. Mathilde doesn't know the significance, hatred and shame they instill in their uncorrupted kind.
 
Karugus said:
It's just a really bad and weird thing to do considering you don't fucking talk about Ranald in the first place.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You know, I'm getting real sick of this conflation of a sacrament of one of his aspects with one of his underlying rules. You don't talk about personally Worshiping The Deceiver. Everything else is only because Witch Hunters get stabby about it.
EVA-Saiyajin said:
How does one even explain the weakening of Mork absent Ranald's part without outright lying?

Nevermind unless for some reason it the Council of War counts as a normal turn and what we did counts as defending everyone (which is one hell of a long shot), there's no way for us to prove anything...though Kragg MIGHT be able to, if he knows what he's looking for, examine the area to find out, but that's more trouble then it's worth.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
'The Ork Prophet was trying to perform a ritual heretical to one of its gods. I interfered in a way that caused the ritual to rebound on the other god, harming it substantially enough to draw its ire' is pretty fool-proof, considering that everybody just watched that god get so mad that he, a god, was personally murdering his own army for every man and dwarf to see.
 
Prospalz said:
Remind me, when did we disregarded orders of our superior officers again?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Embezzling from the elector count we were serving probably qualifies. Not immediately destroying/surrendering The Book probably does as well. Working for the conspiracy early on was technically us following the commands of our immediate superior, but was definitely worse than what Panoramia did just now.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
 
[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol, and the weakening of Mork and strengthening of Ranald.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility.
 
We cannot, possibly prove that Mork is weakened in any respect relevant to mortal endeavours.

Just explaining the idol thing would be enough in context.

[X] The death of the Warboss, the shattering of an Almost-Rogue Idol.
[X] You'd have done the same once. Tell her you understand, but treat her to a lecture on the risks and dangers of miscasts.
[X] The residents are weakened, taking the Citadel is now a possibility
 
Last edited:
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top