You have misunderstood me. For a sacrifice to be a sacrifice we need to give something up. If after the sacrifice we can just go and re-create it then we have not meaningfully given up anything and thus the sacrifice is pointless. If we choose Faith we are not asking Ranald for his blessing to conduct research. We are sacrificing to him the possibility of that research. Thus there is no cease-and-desist order because it is not applicable.
... Even if it really
is like that, then... I kinda want to know what that act of piety and sacrifice results in.
It's a mystery box, yeah, but I want to know what's in that mystery box.
Though I'm not sure that it's... hrm. I dunno if it's necessarily exactly what you outlined here, the mentality here, but. Even if it was, I think I'd be okay for going for that.
Personally, I was treating the "Sacrifice to Ranald" option as the "I want to sacrifice this to Ranald
and see what happens."
No divine energies are getting stolen in these experiments. Essentially this is externally introduced pure Aethyr getting attuned to a divinity and then stored in a crystal. Presumably if one can travel into said divinity's domain and get a sample of ambient energy there the result would be the same.
Well, the way I look at it, it's like this; the Gods provide for mankind, and mankind provides for the Gods.
Think of the relationship between a man and... hmm. Either his local community, or maybe the state or federal government as a whole, or just his local pastor or local sheriff.
If you gained the ability to forge the signature of the federal government or your local priest or military chaplain, and thus gained the potential ability to invoke actions and do things that previously only your Governor or the Pope could do...
is that a thing that is ethically free?
Are you in the clear because you
didn't steal gold from Fort Knox or the Vatican, didn't rob the government, and instead merely usurped the ability of the Chaplain or Mayor to do Chaplain-y or Mayor-y things?
Even if you are not stealing from the sheriffs wallet or the donation box at church, if you are intentionally putting yourself into a place where you could take over the cultural and emotional and religious role that the local church leads... is that still okay?
I think that is the way to look at the sort of fire we are potentially playing with here, and the meaning of the "identity theft, theft of fingerprint" metaphor people are using.
And I'm betting that people will probably make the obvious quip of "So we're in place to be Martin Luther? Well then sign me up for that!"
But that's ignoring the fact that in order to assume that, you have to assume that the Gods of Warhammer were being equally dickish and worthy of being opposed or undermined.
It is making the assumption that "Yeah the situation
deserves a Martin Luther." Except that's not the case. People want the knowledge
because they want the knowledge. And because they think "Well we can do a lot of potential good for it, so that's good, right?" (Alongside some other arguments. Such as "Well, Ranald didn't stop us, so it should be fine" and etc. There's more in there.) I don't think anybody is arguing "The gods are unworthy and
should have a thesis nailed to the doors of all their churches." (Except Omegahugger. I can see him cheerfully going "
Now is the time!" But he'd be the only one who I could see as being genuine about that. About being able to be genuine about saying "I'm all up for being Martin Luther to Ranald". Everybody else would just be using that as a quip. A quip that does not actually counter the overall thrust of the argument I have been making; namely that this is a big thing we are thinking of doing, and that it has connotations and problems and possibly disrespectfulness and etc. That doing a huge upheaval of faith and religion is not something that is an ethics-neutral action.) (There might be some gods that we might be willing to go Martin Luther or Nagash on, of course. But I'm not sure if I want to hold the nuclear grenade in our hands the entire time.)