Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
What are you even arguing anymore? I was never taking about zero sum games or intent vs rusults

I even said 'I'm hoping and hopeful it will go well'

I was arguing against self delusion and post justification.

But there isn't any self delusion to be seen at this point, it feels like you are making a slippery slope argument when we have not even found the hill yet.

The Colleges can't even cover the Empire, adding another polity would only stretch them further.

Counterpoint, the colleges are not even strictly needed to cover the empire, it survived for millennia without them with nothing but priests.
 
Last edited:
I'm very sure that Imperial Dwarves have not just one but multiple expat subcultures. There's the "hill" Dwarves that have lived there since before the Empire was a thing and then swore fealty to it without breaking up their own societies. There's the various Dwarven Clans that over the centuries of the existence of the Empire left their Karaks and the Karaz Ankor for one reason or another and joined the Empire. There's individual Expat and/or Clanless Dwarves with or without families that chose to live in the Empire rather than being second class citizen or wilderness hermits. Some of them might have gotten adopted by more established Expat communities while others did not, but might have formed new ones. And then there's any Dwarves or groups of Dwarves which, for whatever reason, got kicked out of their Imperial Dwarf Clans and relocated internally, twice banished but never in a way that mattered to Humans. And maybe there's even a handful of Dwarves that live directly among Humans and may even have been raised by them in part or in full. Mathilde would belong to that last group, except even more so, what with being born in a Human body and not knowing about her "true" Dwarven nature until she was a (young) adult.

We may not even know that all the dwarves we call Imperial dwarves have actually sworn fealty to the Empire. The survivors of the hill dwarves, if they were present before the Empire showed up, may technically be allies of the Elector Counts rather than vassals. The Middenheim dwarves, if the stories about Grungni's Tower is correct, may be amongst them. The exact relationship may be quite ambiguous and something that's no one really wants to dig to deep into.
 
So here it is. The culmination of a frankly absurd amount of work. Again, take your time reading this, it's 13k words. If you don't care about me recounting the History of K8P and a recounting of the Reclamation, then you can probably skip past those two. The Annotations one is probably the densest spoiler if you want information quick and easy instead of reading thousands of words
Thank you! That must have taken so much time😍

Not really, he's noted as being a political animal. He's going to change it in a way he thinks is better. Which includes multiple Slayer Runelords. This is obviously bad. I don't understand how people can say it's not.
It's bad, sure. But less bad than the entire Runesmiths Guild sliding into obsolescence? The Engineer Guild has immensely progressed since the Ancestors' time, while the Runesmiths' didn't stop declining. Even Kragg is less than the shadow of what the guild was.

If there's runesmiths becoming Slayers, it's likely it will be only a few of them, the runelords who voted against helping Karak Dum, abs probably not all of them. Thorek isn't trying to cause a mass suicide of the entire Guild, and there's no way he would manage.

Look, these all run together and seem to say the same thing: It's Thorek or the Runelords not sharing. But those are not the only options at all. The optimal solution isn't getting more runelords to die without passing on their secrets in the hope that new ones will be better about it, it's to get the Runelords not passing their secrets to pass them on, not lose even their knowledge as well.

This should be obvious. The best thing for the Karaz Ankor and the Empire and Everyone of the Good Guyz isn't dead Runelords, it's runelords with apprentices passing on their stuff.

If your answer to "How do we preserve the secrets of our ancestors" is kill the current generation so the nex one is better, your solution is terrible. Like, the High King just changed his opinion. Consider that.

Why isn't Thorek trying to convince them to pass on their secrets /find worthy apprentices, instead of contributing to the problem by killing what little Runelore is left? We should be trying to preserve Runes, not get those that carry them killed. This should be obvious.

This is a stupid, Grudge Dwarf solution. Don't help him.
And that's being charitable and not calling it an assassination attempt on his competition.
Remember, he is the rare politically savvy dawi.

The right solution is to convince them they are wrong, if not about the lost Karag, then about passing on the Runes. Turning them Slayer just makes the Runelore forever lost. That's only a victory for Thorek as he removes competition and makes himself and his students more prominent and indispensable.

That's not good for anyone, or the Waystones. Hell, by doing this we're removing the very people that may be hoarding said Waystone knowledge instead of trying to get it to work for us.
Do you think Thorek didn't try first to convince them without that? He certainly did try, and failed, because the runesmiths are the most traditionalists and backwards of the Dwarfs. There's no way to convince them without some serious chock.

Only the most traditionalists of the Runelords in the wrong would consider Slayering, and those wouldn't take any apprentices anyway. Them dying isn't that bad, their knowledge is lost no matter if they live or die.
 
How the hell do you propose to convince a hoary old dwarf of the most hoary and old dwarf guild, cult and clan to fundamentally change their entire approach to their craft? Stonebread cookies? Unless you assume that all of them are going to turn slayer from this, some runesmiths with lesser knowledge passing things on is better than none. All runesmiths passing on their lore is a thing of such surpassing optimism that you might as well call for an alliance with Ulthuan.
For refernce see: High King changing his mind. So we know it's possible. A new age is dawning for the dwarves. Why would they pass on secrets if the Karaks are dying? But now, a new time comes. But if they go slayer, say goodbye.

It will not be for the good of the people he will shoot in the head, but it can be very strongly argued that it will be for the good of the people left behind. At the end of the day the Guild of Runesmiths needs reform, I do not think this is a contentious argument. They are after al a dying breed and they are becoming irrelevant to the dwarf way of life.

Runesmiths are I would judge only about as useful for the Karaz Ankor as the Colleges are to the Empire. If every single runesmith in existence came down with the galloping Nurgle shits and died it would be a blow, but it would not spell their end. They would still have canons, They would still have gyrocopters and steam, they would survive.

That is what Thorek is fighting against, he is not the scheming politician trying to get ahead, he is a artisan and a priest staring at the obsolescence of his whole craft and trying to save what he can.
Saying runelords are going obsolete is not factual. Try again. For factual references see: all Runes and all the respect their dawi get.

As for dying: You do not stop a people from dying by killing members of said people, espetially in a low pop situation. This should be obvious.
To be honest, I'm not convinced the runesmiths are going to go slayer. Thorek is giving them an ultimatum—they are failing their ancestors and must change to be better.

When High King Thorgrim was confronted with the same realisation, he didn't go slayer—he changed for the better. And I suspect many Runesmiths will follow both the High King and Runelord Thorek in changing as well. This is a good thing, and I'm not sure why people are claiming that this is going to be disaster.

You think he hasn't been trying? Thorek is immensely politically active.

Making the point of how wrong the elders who say "Don't share your secrets, don't try to advance runecraft, don't change anything" were when it came to Karag Dum is yet another way to try and get the younger runelords who're only 300 years old to change their ways. Because at the moment they're doing what dwarves tend to do: copying their elders. Only if those elders are forced to admit to an error will those who worship them change their approach.

I don't think they'll actually go slayer over this, it'll just be a big political shakeup, but by all means explain your plan to convince the most conservative members of the most conservative society of the most conservative race on the planet to change their most deeply held traditions and literal religious obligations to something that won't see that knowledge lost in the long run, with less fallout, and I will gladly switch my vote.
Two things here: There is a conflation of facts going on. Runelords who keep their secrets and Runelords who did not belive Dum is a crossover event. But it's coorelation, not causation. Convincing said runelords that they were wrong about Dum does nothing about getting them to share. That's not how runes work.

Runes are shared with the worthy. The wider Karaz Ankor, High Kings included, decided not to belive in Dum. That's the kind of preparation that was needed. The Runelords bare some resposibility for this, but hardly all of it. That mostly lies with the High King of the time who decided other matters were more importat, as it was his decision.

Second, even if the Runelords had belived, they would not have taught more people about more runes. Just sent more of the runes they made anyway the way of Dum, or struck more anti-chaos runes/weapons. So the two issues, the "did not belive dum" and "hoarding runes" are not connected issues, except in the persons that carry them.

If Thorek really wants to blame someone, blame the High King of the time.

Second, on making Runelords go Slayer, if Thorek has his way it is inevitable for quite a few. Qoute:

"You understand that every word of this is to go no further than yourself," Thorek says gravely. "These are not Guild secrets exactly, so you would not be Grudged, but you would still earn the enmity of the Guild if you spread what I am about to tell you."

You nod. "I understand."

"Very well." Thorek sighs. "The leaders of the Runesmiths Guild of Karag Dum call themselves 'Runemasters'."

You contemplate that as you look at Thorek's grave expression. "That's it?"

"'Runelord' is the title Thungni bestowed upon the son that succeeded Him when He departed," he explains patiently. "Those that oppose Karag Dum's Runesmiths say that to declare that insufficient is to say that they have reached heights that one taught by Thungni Himself could not reach."

"So it's something of a religious schism."

"And a Clan feud, and a Guild dispute. That is the foundation of the conflict, but not the climax of it. In the Runesmith Conclave of 6769, the last that Karag Dum attended, they announced that Chaos was waxing and that all efforts needed to be spent preparing to withstand it. This was taken poorly, seen as an attempt for Karag Dum to increase their status. Karag Dum has always been focused entirely on the threat of Chaos and has always called for more efforts spent to oppose it, so this was seen as their usual rhetoric, only more so."

You make the mental conversion to the Imperial Calendar - 2246 - and you're pretty sure you know where this is going. "But it wasn't. They were right."

Thorek sighs. "It is easy to see that now. But from what I've been told - and it seems to be true - that century was a tumultuous time in the Old World. High King Alrik had died in battle at the Battle of Black Falls, Bretonnia was tearing itself apart over succession, humans marched on Nehekhara time and time again and agitated the Tomb Kings into a great deal of activity beyond their borders. Worst of all, at the time of the Conclave Ulthuan's forces were on the march in the Old World. In the face of all that, it seemed very self-serving for Karag Dum to announce that it was Chaos that was the real threat. A great deal was said in hot blood, every word of it recorded for posterity."

"What were the Elves doing?"

"Pursuing the Beastman demigod Cor-Dum, but that was not known at the time. The Phoenix King Finubar was still new to the throne, and many Dwarves suspected the worst when his forces made landfall in the Old World."

"So when the Great War Against Chaos proved Karag Dum right..."

"Influential and ambitious Runelords had their words against Karag Dum indelibly recorded. If they had taken the warnings seriously, and fifty years had been spent exerting all effort of the Karaz Ankor to prepare against the coming storm..." Thorek shrugs. "Perhaps the High King would not have fallen. Perhaps Karak Vlag and Karag Dum would not have been lost. Perhaps the Norse Dwarves would not have fallen. Perhaps the Silver Age would not have ended. Anyone that accepted that burden upon their shoulders would have no choice but to shave their head and seek their Doom. But they have not. I did not ask why not, but they answered the unasked question anyway, and what they gave me was not justification, but accusation."

You think back to all the dark warnings you've heard about Karag Dum. "Argumentum ad, er, Dawinem. You can't be blamed for ignoring a warning if the messenger could not be trusted."


Thorek nods. "In my recent travels, I've heard a lot of accusations levelled at Karag Dum. Unstable. Unreliable. Undwarflike. Spent too long too close to Chaos, closer even than the Fire Dwarves were when they fell. Karak Kadrin was once brother to Karag Dum - the former dedicated to Grimnir the Slayer, the latter to Grimnir the Foe of Chaos - but all but the eldest there now half-believe this new truth." He sighs and scratches at his beard, and for a moment he seems very tired. "I don't know any of this for sure, or I'd already be levelling accusations and tearing the Guild asunder. But what I do know indicates that that's how it stands."

I've bolded the relevant part near the end.

At it's core, Thorek is asking Mat to testify that with his last breath Borek meant to tell that said burden was their fault. Since shew as the one who heard his last words and she'd be trusted to interpret them as the only one who saw him speak them/heard the tone.

But that's not what he meant at all. He didn't blame the Karaz Ankor, or the Runelords. He was sad, and disappointed, and resigned and apologetic. His words were:
As the demigod bellows once more but shows no sign of approaching, you risk a glance sideways at Borek, who'd become more and more glued to the prow as you grew nearer to his home. You're not sure what you expect - shock? disbelief? despair? But you definitely weren't expecting resignation. "Borek-"

"We did the best we could," he says. "When it comes time to tell the rest of the Karaz Ankor what has become of us, please tell them that as well. May the Ancestors forgive us."


With that, he pulls loose a knot that causes a rope ladder to unfurl and clambers over the guardrail. "Borek?" you ask, trying to process this as the first of the other Dwarves start to spill out of the lower levels, seeking a better view than they could get from what would have to be very crowded gun-ports.

I don't think Mat should twist a resigned dwarves last words into a dagger to turn other dwarves Slayer.
Just don't. He didn't say it like that, didn't mean it like that.

He wasn't angry at the other dwarves for forcing them to use this final option. He was resigned. In his own judgement, it was Dum's own fault. Unheard warnings and all. Even if in his judgement, it was their fault for not being persuasive enough at said aforementioned runelords conclave, it doesn't matter.

It's a bad lie for a bad cause, just as Mat has reached a point where she's to be treated and trusted as dwarf. Don't abuse it. Don't use it to kill dwarves. There's few enough of them around anyway.

I don't understand how so many are alright with killing runelords when they are so hellishly difficult to replace. Or why people keep arguing that Thorek's way to reform the Runesmiths guild is the right one. Is it giving up? Desperation? Do people honestly think that if in a few decades the dwarven trajectory starts trending upwards again, the runelords won't join in as well?
 
Last edited:
Saying runelords are going obsolete is not factual. Try again. For factual references see: all Runes and all the respect their dawi get.

As for dying: You do not stop a people from dying by killing members of said people, espetially in a low pop situation. This should be obvious.

No, they are in fact going obsolete @Alratan did a very good post about that a few pages back and I do not think I can add more to it at this hour.

Secondly Runelords are not a population, they are a handful of dwarfs. If every last one of them bar Thorek and his apprentices died there would still be plenty of dwarfs of the line of Thungi for them to teach.
 
The real risk for the arm is it has some kind of user identification and reacts…. badly to being put on someone unauthorized. Of course no one has noticed anything that seems like this, such enchantments are rare, and that would also probably be set off trying to dismantle it.
 
Not really, he's noted as being a political animal. He's going to change it in a way he thinks is better. Which includes multiple Slayer Runelords. This is obviously bad. I don't understand how people can say it's not.
I really don't care about the state of Runesmithing at present. It's becoming increasingly useless and irrelevant to the Karaz Ankor, and will only become more so unless something is done. Thorek wants to reforge the Guild: if he succeeds, much will have been gained, if he fails, not much will have been lost.
 
Saying runelords are going obsolete is not factual. Try again. For factual references see: all Runes and all the respect their dawi get.

As for dying: You do not stop a people from dying by killing members of said people, espetially in a low pop situation. This should be obvious.
They are going obsolete slowly, and it's their own fault. The better ones often don't take apprentices because they found no one « worthy » enough to teach them, so all their knowledge is lost when they die.

First, the runesmiths aren't à people, they are an organisation. And you can perfectly save an organisation (or even a people) by killing the ones holding them back and stopping their growth, like the older and most traditionalists runesmiths are doing.
 
I don't understand how so many are alright with killing runelords when they are so hellishly difficult to replace. Or why people keep arguing that Thorek's way to reform the Runesmiths guild is the right one. Is it giving up? Desperation? Do people honestly think that if in a few decades the dwarven trajectory starts trending upwards again, the runelords won't join in as well?

Yes, good God yes. Runesmiths as they are now are emulating Kragg, Kragg is a headcase powered by spite. Do you know what Kragg will do if things get sufficiently better? He will lose that spite, lay down and die of old age, his knowledge lost of the grave. I don't know about you but that does not sound like a model any institution should follow.
 
Last edited:
if Thorek has his way
Thorek is IMO going to try to tear down and rebuild the Guild regardless of our choice here. He has reached his judgement, decided this is the right course of action, and is asking for support in the cause he is already set upon.

This will happen. The strife is coming.

What our endorsement does is A. aid his cause, perhaps leading to a swifter, hopefully cleaner resolution and B. to some small degree dirty our hands with any fallout by association. What it doesn't do is affect whether or not there will be an upcoming conflict in the Guild.
 
Last edited:
Second, even if the Runelords had belived, they would not have taught more people about more runes. Just sent more of the runes they made anyway the way of Dum, or struck more anti-chaos runes/weapons. So the two issues, the "did not belive dum" and "hoarding runes" are not connected issues, except in the persons that carry them.
Dwarves copy those they respect, even moreso than humans. If they lose respect for the people who hold both those viewpoints, they're more likely to change the latter.

--

Additionally, remember what Dum's great crime was: Advancing Runecraft with their Runemasters.

So those two issues aren't separate - anyone who wants to do new things is opposed by the exact same reasoning that condemned Dum.
 
Last edited:
If we're metagaming, it's almost certainly meant for a Skink.

Saurus are a good bit bigger than humans.
That depends which size interpretation you go with. I've usually seen 8 feet for Saurus, but sometimes that includes their tails. So eh.

Well if he fails then he goes slayer, but he will still be pledged to help us. Going slayer does not free a dwarf of all oaths after all, so even at worst we still get his help.
Not all, but a significant number. Actually the only oaths I'm aware of that are even considered equal to the Slayer Oath is those a King is required to take. I doubt Thorek's offer of aid (which he hasn't actually sworn an oath about) will be equal to it.
 
So here it is. The culmination of a frankly absurd amount of work. Again, take your time reading this, it's 13k words. If you don't care about me recounting the History of K8P and a recounting of the Reclamation, then you can probably skip past those two. The Annotations one is probably the densest spoiler if you want information quick and easy instead of reading thousands of words

This is an incredible summary, I'm thoroughly impressed.

Down the Blood River, which could only be sailed downstream with Barak Varr's steamships

It can only be sailed upstream by steamships, anything that floats can go downstream on it.

Assuming "Johann" wins ( :V)... would we be implanting it this turn, or would we have to wait until next turn? Has this already been answered by Boney?

This turn.
 
For refernce see: High King changing his mind. So we know it's possible.

This was possible because how wrong Thorgrim was literally got front and center beamed into his brain. If no one calls the Runesmiths to account and pressures them they've got no reason to change their ways. Even if Dwarven society overall improves there's no reason that would necessarily change their behavior, they could even decide it's a reward/natural result of them maintaining their strict principles, and they should keep up the good work.
 
For refernce see: High King changing his mind. So we know it's possible. A new age is dawning for the dwarves. Why would they pass on secrets if the Karaks are dying? But now, a new time comes. But if they go slayer, say goodbye.
Thorgrim's position was that there was no hope, and we provided that hope. The Runelords' position is that their way of doing things is the only acceptable way, as a religious obligation - they will not be convinced by any way I can see.

I must once again ask you what the alternative you propose is.
 
going to be honest with you noliar: a provocative and passionate argument is not the same as a good argument.

you don't want Johann to get the arm, fine and fair: but instead of coming up with good IC reason its a bad idea, you're trying to run a narrative of it being a moral/ethic/friendship wrong for the characters to use Johann: but that narrative falls flat because we are talking about Wizards being wizards.

Johann is a transhumanist, Mathy has not yet tied Apparitions to her soul only because she doesn't have the time because she is currently testing literal magic mushrooms on herself and her girlfriend, and all of them are part of a group that literally learn magic by stuffing enough of it into themself to mutate in the right way instead of the wrong way.

risky self-experimentation with a non-insignificant chance of death is a standard of mad scientists and they are all mad scientists from a culture of mad science.

if Johann dies, none of them will think it was the wrong decision, just an unfortunate and sad danger of the job.

agree or not (IRL I very much disagree with this shit) but that's their outlook on the topic.

You're trying to champion a taboo that the characters don't have as a taboo.
It's not that I think the characters should have a taboo against transhumanism, it's that I think there is a genuine and material difference between the risks Johann is known to taken in the past, including transhumanist actions, and trying on the arm.

As an analogy, consider two games:

Game A. There is a fish tank, home aquarium size, and in it are a lot of scorpions of different species and a greasy gold nugget. There's an appropriate first aid kit nearby. The game is to reach in and take the gold nugget as your prize. Obviously there's some danger and you don't control everything but you can see the gold and you can see when the most dangerous scorpions are near it - if you are quick and precise then you'll usually get the gold and few if any stings though occasionally you'll end up with no gold and an arm the size of your leg. Thems the breaks. Some people might not want to play but if you need the gold and are confident in your abilities and pain tolerance it's reasonable to do so.

Game B. There is a gold nugget in your pocket, that's your to keep. Put on a blindfold. There is the clunk of some lump heavy metal being put in the tank - could be gromril, gold, or lead. There is the skittering of many venomous arthropods being put in the tank. There is a doctor and a selection of antivenoms on standby. The game is to reach in and take your prize. It might be great but you don't know, you don't know what the stingers are and you don't control whether your hand comes down on the prize or not.

They are different.

I contend that for Johann learning magic beyond PA level, gilding himself and charging Skaven positions were all analogous to game A. They directly advanced important goals, he had some knowledge (but not perfect) of the risks vs reward and, the outcome largely depended on his own performance which he controlled.

Trying on the arm is game B. He already has an alchemically perfect arm. The prosthesis might be noticeably better than what he has or meh or worse, nobody knows. Likewise nobody knows if it's human compatible, if it's compatible with his magic, if it's trapped, if activating the graft takes more than shoving the ball in the socket... He will have no control over success or failure as he'll be drugged up on laudanum, relying on the barber and Mathilde to make sure he doesn't bleed out and on the designs of the unknown makers for the arm to attach - his confidence in his own abilities from his previous exploits should not apply to this decision.

We have word of QM* that Johann wouldn't see the difference. We (and therefore Mathilde) can see the difference and know that Johann wouldn't see it. Mathilde should not present a game B scenario to a trusting friend who she knows will treat it as a game A. The amputee in this case has no gold in his pocket but a debt that only a big nugget will pay - that makes it worth playing.

*
Are you arguing that the thread should vote against Johann doing it, or are you arguing that Johann shouldn't be willing to do it in the first place? Because if it's the former that's fine, but if it's the latter you're not really going to have a lot of success at convincing a writer that their understanding of their own character is inferior to yours.
Johann is a pinnacle of sensible, rational risk assessment. That's why he never poured molten gold in his eyes twice, never used a spell of magical insight on a Dwarven holy place, and never frontally assaulted a Skaven fortification. In fact, he never became a Wizard in the first place, because what kind of weirdo would allow poorly-understood and potentially dangerous magic into their body in the name of power and understanding?
 
I wasn't solely thinking of height there, I'd imagine an arm meant for a Saurus would more-or-less match them in musculature.
Sure, but I don't see Saurus as muscly beyond human possibility, even if most people won't reach that sort of physical form. Much like their height, I see them as being above human average, but not so big humans can't match them.
 
No, they are in fact going obsolete @Alratan did a very good post about that a few pages back and I do not think I can add more to it at this hour.

Secondly Runelords are not a population, they are a handful of dwarfs. If every last one of them bar Thorek and his apprentices died there would still be plenty of dwarfs of the line of Thungi for them to teach.
But far less knowledge to be taught. Wasn't the point of all this to preserve and spread knowledge of runes, not end it?
I really don't care about the state of Runesmithing at present. It's becoming increasingly useless and irrelevant to the Karaz Ankor, and will only become more so unless something is done. Thorek wants to reforge the Guild: if he succeeds, much will have been gained, if he fails, not much will have been lost.
I don't understand how you can say and belive things that are so wrong. Sooo:
:Citation Needed:
Big one. For runesmithing "becoming increasingly useless and irrelevant to the Karaz Ankor".

Because from where I'm standing, plenty of people, inculding us as Mat, think of Runes as very usefull and relevant. Which is why both us and so many others go to so much trouble to get runes.
So some citations are really needed for how you got to runesmithing being useless and irrelevant.
They are going obsolete slowly, and it's their own fault. The better ones often don't take apprentices because they found no one « worthy » enough to teach them, so all their knowledge is lost when they die.

First, the runesmiths aren't à people, they are an organisation. And you can perfectly save an organisation (or even a people) by killing the ones holding them back and stopping their growth, like the older and most traditionalists runesmiths are doing.
When the argument of "save a people by culling the weak and the ones that hold us back" genuinely comes up as the right choice, there is no further argument to be had. History says it is a wasteful, monstrous and ineffective arugment.


Yes, good God yes. Runesmiths as they are now are emulating Kragg, Kragg is a headcase powered by spite. Do you know what Kragg will do if things get sufficiently better? He will lose that spite, lay down and die of old age, his knowledge lost of the grave. I don't know about you but that does not sound like a model any institution should follow.
Or, you know, find a worthy apprentice, like he's been trying to all this time, and pass on his secrets. Then finally be ready to let go, since he knows he trained a successor. Which is how it's supposed to work.

Thorek is IMO going to try to tear down and rebuild the Guild regardless of our choice here. He has reached his judgement, decided this is the right course of action, and is asking for support in the cause he is already set upon.

This will happen. The strife is coming.

What our endorsement does is A. aid his cause, perhaps leading to a swifter, hopefully cleaner resolution and B. to some small degree dirty our hands with any fallout by association. What it doesn't do is affect whether or not there will be an upcoming conflict in the Guild.
No, what it does is lie about the final words of another dwarf to serve his and ours goals while also killing Runelords. He has reached his judgement. But Thorek is not the Grandmaster of the damn Guild. Kragg is. He doesn't get to decide what the guild should be for all other members.


Dwarves copy those they respect, even moreso than humans. If they lose respect for the people who hold both those viewpoints, they're more likely to change the latter.

--

Additionally, remember what Dum's great crime was: Advancing Runecraft with their Runemasters.

So those two issues aren't separate - anyone who wants to do new things is opposed by the exact same reasoning that condemned Dum.
Actually, it's great crime was demonology and consorting with a Beastman demigod and possibly/probably using dark magic. Do you think other runelords should hire beastmen warheards?
This was possible because how wrong Thorgrim was literally got front and center beamed into his brain. If no one calls the Runesmiths to account and pressures them they've got no reason to change their ways. Even if Dwarven society overall improves there's no reason that would necessarily change their behavior, they could even decide it's a reward/natural result of them maintaining their strict principles, and they should keep up the good work.
Does that matter if through the conquest of Karaks, and increast dwarven births/numbers there are more dwarves/more talents/better talents/ worthy apprentices appear?
Thorgrim's position was that there was no hope, and we provided that hope. The Runelords' position is that their way of doing things is the only acceptable way, as a religious obligation - they will not be convinced by any way I can see.

I must once again ask you what the alternative you propose is.
The alternative is we let the High King start his new age, get more dwarves being born. As their numbers rise and the whole Karaz Ankor looks to the future, lead by their High King, the runelords will more look to pass on their teachings. Which means more aggressively trying to find a worthy apprentice instead of churning out runes for the final days of the kingdom.

After all, why look for an apprentice/successor if these are the final days of the dawi?
But if there is to be a new age of rebirth, then suddenly they need to seek out worthy successors.
Remember, the High King was on a Slayer Oath for his whole people, more or less. You think the runelords didn't notice?

And as dwarven women start having larger families(assuming the moral boost takes), more dwarves means more chances for a good, worthy talent to appear.
 
But far less knowledge to be taught. Wasn't the point of all this to preserve and spread knowledge of runes, not end it?

The point is to preserve something out of an art that it looking down the barrel of oblivion

Or, you know, find a worthy apprentice, like he's been trying to all this time, and pass on his secrets. Then finally be ready to let go, since he knows he trained a successor. Which is how it's supposed to work.

You know someone once asked the GM in jest if Kragg would take Mathilde as an apprentice and he said that if she had done all that she had with runes and not magic, he would consider it. That is not having standards, that is deciding the no one is worthy in all but the barest theoretical sense.

Secondly I would contend that that is not how it is meant to work, or at least that is not how it should by any moral metric, the point if runecraft is to help the dwarfs. If that lore is lost though willfully not teaching it and hoarding it like a dragon, that is a moral failing of the runesmith to whom the rest of dwarf society gives so much praise and respect.
 
Last edited:
Sure, but I don't see Saurus as muscly beyond human possibility, even if most people won't reach that sort of physical form. Much like their height, I see them as being above human average, but not so big humans can't match them.
Tabletop stats are an imperfect yardstick, but if we go by them, Scar Veterans have Strength 5, which would put them above any human out there.
 
When the argument of "save a people by culling the weak and the ones that hold us back" genuinely comes up as the right choice, there is no further argument to be had. History says it is a wasteful, monstrous and ineffective arugment.
The runesmiths aren't « the weak ». They are individuals acting against the good of the world and their country. I don't see how it's different from assassinating a rebel noble, like we did during Abelhelm's rule. That was done fairly often historically, and could be very effective.

Here it's not even assassination. If some of the runesmiths choose to suicide because they can't face their errors and are too stubborn to change, so be it.

Edit: just to be clear: I'm not happy about SOME (not all, not even most of them) runelords POTTENTIALY (not certainly) committing suicide. Nonetheless, it is a price I find acceptable to allow runelore to evolve and grow. Canons are so much more powerful than bolt throwers, imagine what could be the rune magic equivalent.
 
Last edited:
@primemountain no offense, but I think you are kind of tilting windmills at this point given the vote disparity and it is pushing you into some rather questionable arguments, like comparing the acceptance of some runesmiths going slayer as 'culling the weak'. It feels like you are trying to evoke an emotional response and for me at least it is not landing.
 
Last edited:
Voting is open
Back
Top