I'll argue strongly against any D4 design. We want the Kepler to act as primary fleet scout and that means it has to skirmish. Even a small difference in D score has a big result in the skirmish phase, as we saw in repeated battles over the last two campaigns. While 90 or 85 SR are large amounts, do they actually translate into more ships? It would take scores of Keplers to have meaningfully more from the savings.

Plus, the moment a Kepler saves a 20 SR repair bill by giving us +4% firing rate in a fight, it makes up for a good chunk of the entire production run savings.
Ah. Hm... I guess you're right.

[X][KEP] S7/P5/D5 Kepler with rec by SWB
Damn, we need a bigger boat.



About that Excelsior replacement I thought was a waste of time a month ago, I've changed my mind, how long until we can build it?
Replacement? Not a B refit?
 
[X][KEP] S8/P4/D5 Kepler with rec by Nix

Thanks for assembling that list, @SynchronizedWritersBlock .

Anyway, I've been gunning for that S8 design from the get go with Kepler. A science frigate that can outdo an excelsior is no small thing. Sacrificing a little diplomacy seems a good trade off for the ability to cheaply handle hard dc events and scouting.
 
Last edited:

In seriousness, I suggest that we focus on beating the snot out of the Cardassians in the skirmish phase and in out-producing them by a wide margin by maintain an economic lead over them by expanding far faster than them and by taking advantage of their disadvantage in the GBZ to double our colony settlement there. Also when assigning fleets for anti-Cardassian operations try to outnumber their Jaldun-bis count 1.5:1.

P.S. vote for both the Centaur-B and 2319 frigate designs in the upcoming Tactical review and the next Snakepit.
 
In seriousness, I suggest that we focus on beating the snot out of the Cardassians in the skirmish phase and in out-producing them by a wide margin by maintain an economic lead over them by expanding far faster than them and by taking advantage of their disadvantage in the GBZ to double our colony settlement there.
P.S. vote for both the Centaur-B and 2319 frigate designs in the upcoming Tactical review and the next Snakepit.

On those notes, how can we improve our defensive capability? More outposts? I've already mentioned having a starbase to base out of.

Can we get any more memberfleet interest? I recall UESP was showing some interest in the GBZ.
 
On those notes, how can we improve our defensive capability? More outposts? I've already mentioned having a starbase to base out of.

Can we get any more memberfleet interest? I recall UESP was showing some interest in the GBZ.
Weapons platforms. The outposts themselves are vulnerable if undefended and are only one gun in battle, but numbers count for a lot, and weapons platforms are essentially extra ships where they are deployed. A Collie starbase or one in that system with the double M class is also useful. I recommend to enable this deploying another engineering team to the GBZ. In practical terms this means building two more engineering ships, hopefully at UP where they can be made in 1.5 years, pulling their freighters and cargo from our logistics, and federalizing more logistics ships.
 
It's very disturbing how the Cardasians have a more effective cruiser than us in pretty much all categories that matter for a slight bump in tonnage and being cheaper in SR costs, I was always under the impression that Federation ships of the same 'year' date would tend towards being well... better but having to spread their stat focus across a broader range of capabilities, whilst groups like the Cardassians or the Klingons would have a slight edge in the military stats.

Kind of a shock to see the Jaldun II being straight up superior to the Rennie in Science as well as hull and shields. The only stat a rennie has the edge with is D, which for a cruiser makes little difference iirc.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand, wouldn't this been seen as an aggressive move entering an alliance with a group that is within the established non-aggression area?

Economic alliance!

Though I actually think the FDS is 100% on board because this reduces the barries between us and the RSE, making it easier to normalize relations. The Romulans are just kinda desperate to check the Klinks at this point

(NOT A GM Statement, just musings)
 
I don't understand, wouldn't this been seen as an aggressive move entering an alliance with a group that is within the established non-aggression area?
More then that; the Federation-Romulan Neutral Zone is an area neither side is supposed to enter. We see multiple times in TNG the Federation and Romulans getting angry at each other for the other side entering, or as they call it on the show trespassing, the Neutral Zone. Having an ally inside the Neutral Zone renders it's whole point for existence moot!
 
So, Horizon combat fleets have a minimum of 12 of their short range corvettes, backed by a 5MT mothership. If we get into a fight with those guys, bear the fleet sizes in mind!

Our intel says there are three Takaaki Science vessels total - we know where all three are currently (one in their side of the CBZ, two scouted for Pact fleets in the GBZ). Was the second GBZ one always there, or was it transferred in from this other war they had going on?

The Romulons are actually winning some of their fights. Bit of a change from Klingon Klingon Klingon. We avoided diplomacy with the Somtaw because they were in the RBZ - guess the Romulons did not extend the same back to us.
 
More then that; the Federation-Romulan Neutral Zone is an area neither side is supposed to enter. We see multiple times in TNG the Federation and Romulans getting angry at each other for the other side entering, or as they call it on the show trespassing, the Neutral Zone. Having an ally inside the Neutral Zone renders it's whole point for existence moot!
Have a summit and dissolve the Federation-Romulan neutral zone.
 
[X][KEP] S7/P5/D5 Kepler with rec by SWB
Adhoc vote count started by Thors_Alumni on Sep 9, 2017 at 5:39 AM, finished with 349 posts and 29 votes.

Adhoc vote count started by Thors_Alumni on Sep 9, 2017 at 5:39 AM, finished with 42 posts and 12 votes.

Adhoc vote count started by Thors_Alumni on Sep 9, 2017 at 9:40 AM, finished with 83 posts and 28 votes.
 
So... is there any way to increase the Federation research speed? Because the Cardassians are seemingly catching up alarmingly fast, especially with their Jaldun II.
 
Economic alliance!

Though I actually think the FDS is 100% on board because this reduces the barries between us and the RSE, making it easier to normalize relations. The Romulans are just kinda desperate to check the Klinks at this point

(NOT A GM Statement, just musings)
I will take it as the usual "our best xenopsych guys say this" then, instead of infallible word of... the various space gods don't really come in infallible, do they?
More then that; the Federation-Romulan Neutral Zone is an area neither side is supposed to enter. We see multiple times in TNG the Federation and Romulans getting angry at each other for the other side entering, or as they call it on the show trespassing, the Neutral Zone. Having an ally inside the Neutral Zone renders it's whole point for existence moot!
Well... is that such a bad thing? Romulan-Federation relations are the best in extant history right now.
 
Have a summit and dissolve the Federation-Romulan neutral zone.
I could actually see this being the Romulan's plan. They befriend the Sotaw and have an alliance agreement written but unsigned. Then they call a summit to discuss dissolving the Neutral Zone, something I can easily see the Federation agreeing to, and the second that is done they sign the alliance agreement with the Sotaw.
 
So... is there any way to increase the Federation research speed? Because the Cardassians are seemingly catching up alarmingly fast, especially with their Jaldun II.
Not clear that's what actually happening. It seems SWB gave an offhand estimate for the maximum plausible ("wouldn't be surprised") stat increase for Jaldun and Kaldar refits and the QMs just ran with it, rather than actually designing refits using newly available techs with the design sheet?

They still don't match our shield regeneration.

Maybe we should request a report on their research and tech level next year?
 
You've also been informed that one of the Cardassian's latest clients seem to be pretty advanced.
 
You've also been informed that one of the Cardassian's latest clients seem to be pretty advanced.
While true the only bit we know about the Imelak is that they are Federation level:
These technologies all appear to be at least on par with the Federation's own cutting edge, and their genetic and ecological engineering technologies in particular are without a doubt superior.
which doesn't really change things seeing as we can't recreate the Renaissance with Starfleet's tech on the spreadsheet. This is important considering that the Jaldun-II is better in every category despite only being a little heavier and a refit rather then new build.

Also cruiser frames are their shtick.
I'm surprised you can upgrade frames in a refit. That seems like the sort of thing that would be unchangeable.
 
So the Cardassians directly get access to clients' tech, but we don't get anything from affiliates or even members, not even a couple of points to industrial replicators from the Gaeni?

This has been bugging me as well.

@OneirosTheWriter What exactly are the rules regarding tech sharing with affiliates/members? It does not make a lot of sense to not get anything. Sorry if this has been asked before.
 
Back
Top