The Reliant fought evenly with an already damaged and limping Enterprise; in a straight fight I'm pretty sure the Enterprise would have a commanding lead.That is intentional.
I'd argue that it would a bit undergunned relative to the actual Miranda as the Reliant was fighting evenly with the Enterprise whereas this design would get beaten soundly by our version of the Enterprise.
Also it would be making an appearance a lot earlier than the Miranda which was a 2260s design.
[ ] Defense Satellite
if we do big honken science disc, I think it should be a proper disc. No secondary/engineering hull! Just saucer! Pure saucer!Frigate nothing. I want to build a big honken Science Disk. Make it a flying hospital, biolab, and greenhouse.
I am firmly of the opinion that 180kt is about the floor for ship sizes we should build. An 180kton ship has average maneuverability with one type 3 thruster. Going smaller doesn't make sense.200kt would be bigger than the ship we just designed.. I would aim for 100kt if we were designing a biosciences ship.
if we do big honken science disc, I think it should be a proper disc. No secondary/engineering hull! Just saucer! Pure saucer!
Going big is literally impossible.I am firmly of the opinion that 180kt is about the floor for ship sizes we should build. An 180kton ship has average maneuverability with one type 3 thruster. Going smaller doesn't make sense.
Yes. The flying saucer comes to study your farm animals.
My problem are the aux slots.200kt would be bigger than the ship we just designed.. I would aim for 100kt if we were designing a biosciences ship.
We should design complimentary science shuttles that are also flying saucers.
The Excalibur isn't a huge ship. It too was built on a tonnage budget.Going big is literally impossible.
"Such a vessel would ideally be small and well-specialised."
Whilst small can have a number of interpretations none of them jive a ship over 120,000 tonnes, imo. And I'd call going a solid half of the Excalibur mass (90,000 tonnes) about right.
Is there an inherent problem with a smaller ship being able to dance on a standard model thruster? Is there a downside?I am firmly of the opinion that 180kt is about the floor for ship sizes we should build. An 180kton ship has average maneuverability with one type 3 thruster. Going smaller doesn't make sense.
90kt of pure Saucer is still a pretty large craft, no? Going by Galleli it's something larger than 100m of saucer (which got us 82kt). 110m, maybe?Going big is literally impossible.
"Such a vessel would ideally be small and well-specialised."
Whilst small can have a number of interpretations none of them jive a ship over 120,000 tonnes, imo. And I'd call going a solid half of the Excalibur mass (90,000 tonnes) about right.
It feels very weird.Is there an inherent problem with a smaller ship being able to dance on a standard model thruster? Is there a downside?
That takes longer to build, needs more crew, and requires a larger shipyard. Hulls are cheap, not free.It feels very weird.
And it feels like "Well, why not just take the same core, same weapons, same thrusters, and just add an extra 90,000 tons of ship and a little extra shield (that ends up making the shields more powerful).
80% of the ship cost is the same between a 90kton ship and a 180kton ship with the same equipment.
And in return you get something like 2-3 times the free internal space to actually do science in.
The only extra crew you need are the crew using the extra facilities. We know a major cutoff for shipyards is 200,000 tons.That takes longer to build, needs more crew, and requires a larger shipyard. Hulls are cheap, not free.
Yeah, it would definitely take a dedicated warship to take on the Excalibur Class in a straight fight no matter how smart Kahn is.That is intentional.
I'd argue that it would a bit undergunned relative to the actual Miranda as the Reliant was fighting evenly with the Enterprise whereas this design would get beaten soundly by our version of the Enterprise.
Also it would be making an appearance a lot earlier than the Miranda which was a 2260s design.
Is it wrong that I want to design another sphere ship, but combine the cheap requirement with the biological analysis by having the main systems and crew quarters be in the outer hull, with a void space between it and an inner-sphere with only minimal connections between the inner and outer spheres. You know, for containment purposes, just in case.
And get the fiddly little choices in the TYPE of bioscience shipGoing to go with the bioscience ship. It will be fun to do a ship where we can specialize in our science stat.
Please no. For all the Archer was capable at her duties, the orb design in Trek style is eye searing.Is it wrong that I want to design another sphere ship, but combine the cheap requirement with the biological analysis by having the main systems and crew quarters be in the outer hull, with a void space between it and an inner-sphere with only minimal connections between the inner and outer spheres. You know, for containment purposes, just in case.