Yes, technically it showed up on the globes, not the maps, It's still in the public mind that it went on maps due to your average joe not knowing the difference between what goes on a globe vs what goes on a map.I wouldn't go so far as to put it on maps - it's been debunked that the sentence was ever used in them - but I could see BB's new official motto being "HIC SVNT DRACONES" (in Latin, as it is proper).
You put it better than I could have. All I could come up with was: Holy. Shit.As someone who reads the chapters as they are posted on the CTC Forums...
HOLY FUCKBALLS
We now return to your regularly updated SV thread.
I almost would be willing to pay money to read that.Idea: Dennis teaching Hallie how to play Magic: the Gathering while laughing about all the mistakes the new D&D set makes.
Why? Why does fiction have to straight-out copy reality? A reality characters are directly involved in. Even if it is the reality of another universe.
I don't get it?I almost would be willing to pay money to read that.
Almost.
OTOH, I *definitely* would pay to see the various dragons go and make compliments towards the artist who did almost all the dragon art in 3.5.
Tiamat:
"Sketch me like you do your french models."
*sultry sounding, in full 5 headed hydra form*
Possibly; I know the art in 1st Edition was... Bad, or rather, not good. Granted, 1st Ed. had its issues, and probably scraping money up to print the books was one of them. 2nd Ed. was better, as in TSR had the money to spend on the art. The best dragon art of the time was for Dragonlance, by Mr. Elmore. I had a chance to talk to him at a Gencon, and I wished I would've had the money to commission him (It wasn't cheap. It would take 25 years before I would have that level of disposable income). The art of 3.5e and 5e are almost as good as Mr. Elmore's work, so that makes it loads better than 1 & 2e.I don't get it?
Is this a reference to the art being stupid good?
Yes, that snippet will make it obvious just how powerful she really is.Yes, I really can't wait till next month when he posts that chapter here and the reactions it will get. Vista really is quite a powerhouse.
Puns like that are you how get lost in a Maze forever, you know.Yes, that snippet will make it obvious just how powerful she really is.
Dare I say, painfully obvious?
Do you mean a Maze of Maize?Puns like that are you how get lost in a Maze forever, you know.
I don't have a source for this right off, as it comes from a conversation with Mike Molnar(A member of the gaming group that Dungeons & Dragons spawned from), but supposedly the thing about the less than stellar art in the first edition was not only known at the time, but Gary's response was roughly "Yeah, I know, but he only charges five dollars a picture". So scraping up the money was definitely part of it. I can go looking for the forum posts if anyone really wants.Possibly; I know the art in 1st Edition was... Bad, or rather, not good. Granted, 1st Ed. had its issues, and probably scraping money up to print the books was one of them. 2nd Ed. was better, as in TSR had the money to spend on the art. The best dragon art of the time was for Dragonlance, by Mr. Elmore. I had a chance to talk to him at a Gencon, and I wished I would've had the money to commission him (It wasn't cheap. It would take 25 years before I would have that level of disposable income). The art of 3.5e and 5e are almost as good as Mr. Elmore's work, so that makes it loads better than 1 & 2e.
Seconded. Very very seconded.As someone who reads the chapters as they are posted on the CTC Forums...
HOLY FUCKBALLS
We now return to your regularly updated SV thread.
No. Her worldbuilding does not fall apart. Her fans' deluded imaginary constructs of a world, made up by them of disconnected titbits she sprinkles about and glued together by their own interpretations fall apart when the pieces she has given them don't fit together like they want them to fit. And they are too deluded to consider different ways of fitting them.Rowling's problem is that worldbuilding doesn't hook new readers in, but good worldbuilding acts as a reward for dedicated fans. Thus her dedicated fans tending to become a hatedom, because her worldbuilding falls apart in a stiff breeze (little things like it being a critical plot point that Dumbledore has to fly to the Ministry of Magic at the climax of the first novel, then a new method of teleportation gets introduced every book for the next five books).
No, her worldbuilding is, in fact, an unstable mess. Take it from someone who worldbuilds for fun.No. Her worldbuilding does not fall apart. Her fans' deluded imaginary constructs of a world, made up by them of disconnected titbits she sprinkles about and glued together by their own interpretations fall apart when the pieces she has given them don't fit together like they want them to fit. And they are too deluded to consider different ways of fitting them.
while I stew in the 110F heat indices (or about 44-45C for the metric folks)
And I'm now picturing the black dragons (who perfer swamps) living in Florida, and maybe that's why the place has so many....interesting stories about it.
Dragon 1: "And then I said: 'I'm just a really big crocodile, nothing to see here', and the drunken idiot BELIEVED ME!"
Dragon 2: *chuckles* Humans will believe anything if they have enough alcohol.
Now all I can picture in my head is Steve Earl's song Copperhead Road. Thanks for that. Also, outsider baiting is a common sport worldwide. Just look at Snipe hunting in the U.S. or Haggis hunting here in Scotland.And now I'm picturing a redneck dragon living in the Appalachian Mountains, brewing moonshine as a hobby, and all the rest of the people living in the area just ignore the dragon part, because hey, its good moonshine.
"Giant lizard? Nope, never seen one. Just Old Dave up there. Comes down for supplies every so often, otherwise keeps to himself."
They all know he's a dragon, just nobody gives a shit. And fooling outsiders is a sport.