Isnt this just a trading mission cum funeral? Why were so many people interested in coming with us?
1. A trading mission is a good way to get money. We split our proceeds, they get to bring home a nice little nest egg to build up their farms with or buy one if they don't have one already. Especially since our last trading mission was like, so much more successful than anyone elses.
Btw, do we wanna do the Fylgja contact spell to tell Farbjorn Steinnar and his father are both dead? We can even ask him to send a message to Gabriel.
We can also use that spell to contact Aki, ask for his help in the murder investigation without going to Vestfold. We can probably contact Veny too.
Last thing, should we tell Solrun everything we learnt from the divination? This might be a social action but its probably worth it if we can afford it. If only to get her opinion on the reliability of the results.
I actually meant we get Aki to pass her a message, like with Gabriel. And we can likely do both on the ship. Still should figure out the details thoughI don't think we know Veny well enough for that, but we could contact the other two, potentially. That's actions, though...so we may do it, but we need to consider the details.
Solrun has Eyetalking. We can also do everything in Eyetalking.. on top of maximum privacy.Yeah, we ensure privacy and tell Solrun everything. She's not gonna side with Dorri over us in a million years and knows how to keep a secret. We may do that as one of our 'seeress topics' this turn.
Using the brazen-heartleaf is over-reacting to his Nidheart. Also we would need to figure out how to prepare the leaf correctly too otherwise we'll get Folkmarr. It's a minor nidheart not a built in flaw that we need to correct.I just had a trought, could the Brazen-Heartleaf (the magical plant that Dorri supposedly stole from Buri once) help Kurt with his nidheart?
If we manage to recover one, we can help him. Shame we lost our chance with the one Buri offered us.
Using the brazen-heartleaf is over-reacting to his Nidheart. Also we would need to figure out how to prepare the leaf correctly too otherwise we'll get Folkmarr. It's a minor nidheart not a built in flaw that we need to correct.
maybe add another part, or some spells, that will curse/harm anyone trying to break or cancel the runes? like with Horra's horse head. I don't like the idea of someone managing to easily destroy our runes.Shard's F-U Privacy Runes
Words woven within, whispered not without.
Secrets spoken sealed shut.
Ears outside, eavesdropping inside,
Hears only hearsay and halftruths -
(A riven riddle without an answer.)
Here's a privacy riddle if we want to use it. It's written in Ljóðaháttr, Galdralag (Incantation verse) variant. With the 5th line (written in brackets) it's Galdralag, without it's Ljóðaháttr. I prefer the version with 5 lines, but the version with 4 lines should still work, if less elegantly. The rhyming for this one is extremely tight, too.
The intention of this is that not only do eavesdroppers not hear what's going on inside, they get information that sort of makes sense if you think about it, but no, not really, it's just a red herring. I want people who eavesdrop on us to not merely not get anything, I want them to actively waste their time pointlessly trying to reason out what was being said.
Note that this wouldn't work on someone who got inside, like with an Ant Fylgja. Something to keep in mind.
We would want to be able to cancel the runes on command, so not really the best idea. After all, we would only want the runes to be used when we are actually talking. The runes being broken would not be a real concern.maybe add another part, or some spells, that will curse/harm anyone trying to break or cancel the runes? like with Horra's horse head. I don't like the idea of someone managing to easily destroy our runes.
we can also make anti ant runes, most likely? though as specific as it is its very suspicious, so only if we can be sure no one will find them
Eh. Ants are obnoxious vermin that sneak into your house and eat your food. I wouldn't be surprised if lots of seidr practitioners have anti-vermin protection on their homes. It's at random spots in the wilderness where that kind of thing would be suspicious.we can also make anti ant runes, most likely? though as specific as it is its very suspicious, so only if we can be sure no one will find them
As in, the runes have to be seen by the person or thing they are working on?As for anti ant runes.. remember that runes have to be seen to work.
I mean, we can just include a password or riddle letting us safely disable the rune?We would want to be able to cancel the runes on command, so not really the best idea. After all, we would only want the runes to be used when we are actually talking. The runes being broken would not be a real concern.
From what I recall, they need to be visible on the item/place (It needs to be possible to be understood). Other than that though you're good to go.As in, the runes have to be seen by the person or thing they are working on?
I mean more, if we want to use the runes we would obviously be able to tell if they are working or have been tampered with. After all we would be like, putting the runes on the inside of the room we are working on.I mean, we can just include a password or riddle letting us safely disable the rune?
Well, then. I'd think that putting anti-ant runes or anti-ant seidr on the interior of a home would be pretty much par for the course.From what I recall, they need to be visible on the item/place (It needs to be possible to be understood). Other than that though you're good to go.