@OneirosTheWriter, any chance to tow the wreckage out of the system before poking it?
Yes, nuclear reactors are safer than devices first created by *the* mad scientists and then destroyed and thus destabilised; nuclear reactor with blown up control system is more apt comparison, thanks for reminder....those two things are completely different and you know it, don't be ridiculous.
... The test, to follow your analogy, would be to check the board layouts, do X-ray and ultrasonic scans and to look where goes what. Not "let's switch on the power and see what happens".Yes, nuclear reactors are safer than devices first created by *the* mad scientists and then destroyed and thus destabilised; nuclear reactor with blown up control system is more apt comparison, thanks for reminder.
Yes, nuclear reactors are safer than devices first created by *the* mad scientists and then destroyed and thus destabilised; nuclear reactor with blown up control system is more apt comparison, thanks for reminder.
Exactly my point. Even this super-careful test by Vulkans of all people has a chance of blowing up a star system.... The test, to follow your analogy, would be to check the board layouts, do X-ray and ultrasonic scans and to look where goes what. Not "let's switch on the power and see what happens".
Compared to embedding it into a warp field or dismantling it? Yes. I'd like to know what could happen.Imagine the object, even scanning of which might blow up your whole city, and say to me whether you would allow said scanning at all, let alone, say, next door to yoy.
I imagine the mentat who almost blew up a star had a similar thought processWe don't need any such comparisons since we know how the mechanics work out - we would have to crit-fail two rolls (first to fail the research and the second about the range of the failure) which is mathematically a very unlikely event to happen.
Why do you think we got a visit from a laughing Q?I imagine the mentat who almost blew up a star had a similar thought process
Compared to embedding it into a warp field or dismantling it? Yes. I'd like to know what could happen.
I imagine the odds were lower and thry usually were not in inhabited systems, conquered for, hypocritically enough, recklessly endangering innocent lives in the name of RP bonus.Why do you think we got a visit from a laughing Q?
Because anytime one of our explorers pokes an temporal or spatial anomaly, something like this could happen.
Do you remember the TNG episodes where Enterprise investigated a time anomaly with tachyons, in three different timestreams, and accidentally prevented life to emerge on earth?I imagine the odds were lower and thry usually were not in inhabited systems, conquered for, hypocritically enough, recklessly endangering innocent lives in the name of RP bonus.
Thunderhead was one of the Miranda-As, Blizzard was a Centaur-A.
Don't worry, it was taken off the -0 tallies, not the -A tallies, I just misspoke at the time.All - Our crew shortage is terrible and there is no guarantee we won't ahve to fight at least one more battle. We really, really need that "Kahurangi recruits" option.
Pretty sure Thunderhead was *not* one of the ships we have refitted to be a Miranda-A.... since I had it on schedule for a 2316 refit.
No I don't. what episode was that?Do you remember the TNG episodes where Enterprise investigated a time anomaly with tachyons, in three different timestreams, and accidentally prevented life to emerge on earth?
The series finale.
Well, let's face it, Starfleet's MO is poking things with a stick to see what happens so I wouldn't be surprised if Starfleet would have eventually done something of the sorts without Q interference.Which was literally set up by Q to happen because reasons, so I wouldn't exactly accept it as a usual risk as opposed to "Act of a God"