If the full Arcadian fleet sails to aid against Thuir, then Eaton should have a clean run against her target.
If Eaton can time her attack to be simultaneous with the attack on Ixaria (not too much to hope for but we have no confirmation of it), and
if the Ked Paddah delay their attack until Eaton is ready (likewise), then yes. That would be one of the better aspects of this situation.
[] Ixaria VII - "Ixira's Scalpel"
[] No second target
[] No third target
...Uh, RageMaion , could you do me a favor and explain how you arrived at a line of reasoning under which the Ixaria VII station is so important that it should be our only target? More important than the system that lets enemy ships sneak up on us? More important than the system that forcibly scatters our fleet and prevents it from fighting in formation? More important than the station in close orbit around Ixaria's star that we strongly suspect is a weapon?
I mean don't get me wrong, shield penetration is a powerful mechanic, but it's not
that powerful.
I dunno,
@Simon_Jester. Thuir says "we will need to choose carefully what we want to soften up first" and follows it by "before taking on Ixaria itself".
Therefore, the plan is:
Pick "up to three" targets to soften up the system.
Then take on Ixaria itself.
There's
nothing to suggest we get to run wild and wreck every target in the system in multiple waves. We get to pick three targets, then they take on Ixaria itself. Everything points in this direction, the mention of splitting the fleet three ways at most, the time limit that both the KP and Thuir acknowledge, and Thuir's very precise statement that we will need to
select what to hit before we hit Ixaria itself.
If so, then this offensive is very ill-advised, unless we have reason to be
sure there will be no major reinforcements coming to Ixaria.
And yet many of us believe that there will be a heavy wave of reinforcements doing exactly that, maybe as early as the "step two" battle in which we are apparently going to be committed to attacking Ixaria Prime whether we like it or not.
So to be clear, below I refer to "this hypothesis." The hypothesis I mean is "there are going to be heavy reinforcements coming to Ixaria in response to our attack, shortly after our first wave of attacks against the defenses, or at any rate
before we could complete a second wave of such attacks."
...
If this hypothesis is true, then Thuir and the Ked Peddah are setting themselves up for a situation in which they have only begun to thin out the defenses, and are engaged heavily in battle with the Ixaria Prime planetary fortifications, when suddenly a large reinforcement fleet hits them,
still buffed by the bulk of the Ixaria defense network. This is a recipe for military disaster and I am flabbergasted that anyone would consider this to be a good strategy. The potential for disaster remains high regardless of whether we concentrate our force in the first wave of attacks, or whether we disperse our force. Because while the latter option means we risk having one of our component forces mauled by the Ixira defense fleet, the former option means that the already powerful defenses in place to 'buff' the reinforcement fleet become
even stronger.
So if this hypothesis is true, then the only prudent strategy we could be pursuing was that of raiding: a "hit and run" strike designed to damage the Ixaria system defenses and retreat before taking significant losses. There is
NO low-risk way to attack this star system if we are limited to a single wave of attacks against the defenses, after which we are forced to attack Ixaria Prime and/or deal with a major reinforcement fleet.
...
Alternatively, suppose this hypothesis is
not true. If so, then there is no obvious reason why we cannot or should not launch multiple waves of attacks to thin out the defenses. We are under no obligation to charge into the thickest part of the enemy's fortifications,
before neutralizing the various forces that are poised to stab us in the back. Indeed, it would seem a matter of basic common sense that we do so, rather than leaving ourselves vulnerable.
If we could launch two waves of successful attacks against the defenses, then even if we had to retreat from the system with many ships damaged and did NOT succeed in capturing the system, that would still be a victory. Because at that point, the Ixaria system would be open and vulnerable to conquest by our remaining forces. Its "teeth" would have been largely removed, or at least blunted.
If the Licori wished to preserve the defensibility of the system, House Ixara would have to appeal to the Emperor to station a large fraction of the Licori fleet in the system. We could then use other task forces like Nash's fleet or the Gaeni fleet, plus the remnant of Thuir and the Ked Paddah's forces, to assault the system and destroy that fleet. We'd be buying a very valuable advantage with the damage to the fleet now planning to attack Ixaria...
If we could launch two waves of attacks against the defenses. The effect is greatly decreased if we only get one wave, instead.
...
So to summarize, if this hypothesis is true, then the entire attack plan is ill-conceived and there is no feasible way to make it low risk other than to 'demote' the plan to a mere raid against one or two of the Ixaria defense stations- and such a raid would not achieve much unless we have specific, actionable plans for follow-up attacks. That sounds like exactly the trap the Ked Paddah have been sucked into, causing them to fight eight previous battles for this system: repeated, low-risk, low-reward offensives that accomplish nothing decisive and leave us trapped in a perpetual status quo.
And if this hypothesis is false, then there is no reason for Thuir and the Ked Paddah to restrict themselves to one wave of attacks against the defenses before hitting Ixaria Prime. There would be good reasons for them
not to thus restrict themselves.