So, about the name(s)...
This is a
warship. It has one job, and we will never build it for any other reason. Every last one of them we build is meant to do one thing: To do harm to the enemy.
Every part of our warships needs to be dedicated to that purpose, from the weapons, to the hull plating, to the sensors, to the engines. Naturally, this includes the names we give our ships. I therefore propose the following Starfleet policy:
Starfleet Ship Naming Convention #1:
Ships meant for general use get conventional names with dignity, tradition and gravitas, like Enterprise, Columbia, Challenger, etc, etc... Warships however, always get cutesy, non-threatening names. The nastier the warship, the more harmless the name.
Why? It's simple: The name is part of the ship's armament. It's a weapon. A weapon to
inflict humiliation on the enemy.
I want the Romulan Prateor to grind his teeth as he's forced to read a report about how
IRW Imperial Pride was gutted by
UES Gentle Breeze. I want our enemies to break and rout as they are desperately trying to get away from
UES Loving Embrace! I want them to live in terror of the thought of
UES Cuddlebug assuming bombardment position above their worlds!
I want some Klingon Chancellor 50 years from now to take a look at a record of the Federation-Romulan war, laugh his ass off, and then decide it would be much safer to invade the Romulans instead of the Federation. After all, there's no honor in winning a fight against ships named like
that. And the
unspeakable shame if one should loose... a dreadful foe indeed.
[X] UES Hummingbird
[X] UES Magpie