urrently I only remember us talking to his son and to high end magic users. I am sure I am forgetting some others, but I am also sure we haven't asked for the opinion of any commoners.
But maybe I am wrong. Who were those of lesser status that complained about him to the point of insinuating incompetence?
Boyers and civilians during Drycha incident.
I'm not going to deny my biases (my gut reaction to this vote is No and I also see no issue with trying to make up numbers to translate gut feelings because I was a long time fan of a community that actively did that), but right now, based on the discussion of the two of you, it feels to me like you are the one engaging in a mix of misrepresenting facts and accusing the other party of intentionality in their oversights.
Specifically the ideas that the palace guards are majority loyal to Boris over Vladimir, that Boris is obviously transparent and sincere, that we'd need multiple nat 1s in a row to leave any evidence pointing towards Mathilde and that Vladimir is widely looked down upon by the majority of the nation are all ideas that I don't remember seeing such strong support for in chapter text or Boney comments. Which of course might just be my faulty memory.
Then considering it "moving the goalposts" when the two of you have been arguing about one aspect of why loonyphoenix considers this a bad idea, and loonyphoenix considers there to be other problems as well after conceding that they were wrong about that one aspect and the general belligerence (not helped by the liberal use of "fucking" for emphasis repeatedly used towards just one person) make you seem actively hostile, over what in the end is a vote in how this story we all love should continue.
And that speaks well of you, not my cup of tea it just feels like trying to obfuscate opinion with unwarranted empiricism to create a misleading impression.
The palace guards are the Kremel Guard, who are renowned for being devoted to him (one person even referred to them as his pets.)
Boris, based on our past experiences with him and his actions during the meeting, is being sincere. This is entirely in line with how he's acted in the past, to do what is necessary to keep Kislev safe from Chaos, and now his hand is being forced by factors beyond his ability to simply wait out, something we are also well aware is happening.
That isn't a fact its my opinion. I think its a reasonable one since we've nat 1'd in the past and not instantly had things go up shit creek. I am very confident that between Mathilde, her skills and Boris likely leading/having massive influence over any investigation that any evidence left can be hidden.
We've seen he is not well-liked by a large proportion of people because he's not seen as doing his job properly. Most people likely don't think about him on a day to day basis, why would they, but their impression of him from what we can tell is at best taking advantage of his neglect and at worst irritated at him not doing his job (this isn't including the ice witches etc.)
They originally said that they were against it because Mathilde might be bad at it, then they decided the reason it shouldn't be done was because Boris hasn't considered alternatives, and then it became Boris is suspicious. The first one I argued against because we have reason to believe that Mathilde can do it, and the latter two I argued vehemently against because it requires taking numerous negative assumptions of Boris while deliberately excluding any of the more reasonable ones that could be inferred from our prior experiences with the man.
From our meetings with him would you say it's reasonable to think that he is a thick-headed, unreasonable person who doesn't consider alternatives? As an example we refused his very generous offer of aid if we based the project in Kislev, but instead of being upset about it he was happy to see us again helping Kislev and was happy to provide what aid he could to the project. Do you think it reasonable from that to assume he hasn't spent ages thinking about how to deal with the problem of his father being very unreasonable on these matters (something he'd be best placed to know), or that he hasn't done that and is playing unreasonable hard ball to get his father assassinated?
Yes I use it for emphasis, hostility would look very different and fair doos if you like the story or don't remember things clearly, but then its cogent on you to also go and check them, not distort what has happened to support the outcome desired, which I feel is what was happening.
.
