This kind of shit hurts your argument more then helps.
This kind of shit hurts your argument more then helps.
Only over a thousand? Most I read have hit a good fifteen hundred or so. Well, except for the recent ones that have caught my attention, but that's probably just because I've gotten through all the good ones already.In this case, it's over a thousand comics. It takes a bit to get going (the plot doesn't really emerge until after the, I dunno, first fifty or so?), but once it does it never really breaks stride.
Later strips get really long.Only over a thousand? Most I read have hit a good fifteen hundred or so. Well, except for the recent ones that have caught my attention, but that's probably just because I've gotten through all the good ones already.
Jokes can get annoying.
No, you didn't. You just voted that others not get one scene you didn't want. It's kind of hard to read it any other way when you didn't even bother reading through the list to strip out the '22 votes' chaff.
Well, I haven't done it in a while but that's like the best way to fall asleep if you are an overthinker, just beautiful meaningless background noise, like shiny rain.My personal opinion is that you're only old if you fall asleep in front of the TV.
I'm not really judging them for the vote.If the reason that they voted for every option but one is that they want to avoid seeing the one, that's a valid reason, and compatible with the principle of 'vote for what you want'. It may come at the cost of any nuance to their vote, but that's their choice to make. You may not like their reason, but I don't think judging people for their votes is a good practice.
I'm willing to give some allowance on cases like that. I'm mostly talking about just straight up watching it and then falling asleep.Well, I haven't done it in a while but that's like the best way to fall asleep if you are an overthinker, just beautiful meaningless background noise, like shiny rain.
This reminds me of the times I've had to hand-tune tight loops in low-level programs. After a certain point all the abstractions drop away and you're just directly manipulating the entire state at once. The steps of the algorithm are no longer separated into even individual instructions; every operation does two or three or four things at once and all of the functionality is entangled into a single inscrutable - but extremely efficient - mass.
Relevant: The Story of Mel.
The Story of Mel is set in the stone age of computing, abstract programming languages were too inefficient for hardware at the time. It's true that that's a horrible way of programming now but that's because we have plenty of spare computing power to make such things unnecessary. If we tried using 'proper' programming practice on those ancient machines we'd be able to accomplish a lot less than what Mel could. And at the end of the day what the people hiring programmers cared about was what you could make computers do, not how you made them do it.The 'story of mel' is absolute nonsense glorifying a absolute shitty way to program. If you want abtractions and efficiency, may i direct you to a 'real' programing language like rust that isn't built on quicksand and ducktape?
Imagine being impressed at using a integer overflow to self modify code to a jump. No wonder he couldn't fix the bug. Not coincidentely, most operating systems and languages started to provide tools to forbid self-modifying code.
I kind of want to, but at the same time it's kind of busybodyish? Mathilde's not even living in the same polity as him any more; I'm not really sure who she'd talk to in Blutdorf or elsewhere about matchmaking. Unless he likes dwarven girls?I feel really sad for Anton though. We should really put some personal effort into finding someone for him.
We could also aks Heidi, the empress herself as a matchmaker should make every batchelorette take notice.I kind of want to, but at the same time it's kind of busybodyish? Mathilde's not even living in the same polity as him any more; I'm not really sure who she'd talk to in Blutdorf or elsewhere about matchmaking. Unless he likes dwarven girls?
Oh, we could ask Julia! Spymistress for Stirland is certainly going to be familiar with the gossip about eligible noblewomen in the region.
To the contrary, dragons are some of the most ill defined and varied mythical creatures out thereDragon's across fiction are pretty constant my dude.
like you get the rare deviation, but most of them are pretty similar.
i mean Cython certainly do, he hordes treasures, like all dragons, he sleeps a lot, like all dragons, He wont take people fucking with his domain, like all dragons. He's see most things as fleeting because of his immense age, like all dragons.
I mean, Roswita's unmarried, right?We could also aks Heidi, the empress herself as a matchmaker should make every batchelorette take notice.
Just, a thorough background checks first, we want someone nice and friendly, not a secret axe murderer.
When a dragon cause trouble, do you hire a dragon slayer or a dragon layer? And which is Mathilde?To the contrary, dragons are some of the most ill defined and varied mythical creatures out there
Does it have legs? How many? wings? How many? Horns? Spikes? is it a great serpent? Does it breath fire? Is it associated with storms, rivers, or other bodies of water? Can it fly? Is it made out of a bunch of traits from other creatures? etc.
Sure there's a sort of stereotypical dragon that most people think of nowadays; fire breathing, 4 legged, winged reptile that might have horns and spikes attached. But even then there's a lot of grey area that varies wildly.
Is it evil? Misunderstood? Friendly? Does it just want to be left alone? Is it an animal or intelligent? Can it speak? Is it solitary? Does it hoard things? What does it hoard? Is it magical? Can it shapeshift? Is it also a wizard? etc.
Dragons are widely recognizable, but also somewhat counterintuitively they are very poorly defined, and vary wildly in how they act and what literary role they play
Sometimes they are monsters to be slain, sometimes they are gods, sometimes they are forces of nature, sometimes they noble creatures, sometimes they repositories of knowledge and wisdom
Am I being excessively pedantic? Probably
There's a reason I wrote that I was reminded of the times I "had to" hand-tune tight loops. In one case I was writing GBA homebrew and getting some AI to run inside a single frame was easier than redesigning the whole thing to run an online planner and cache partial plans between frames. Rust hadn't been invented yet. In another case I was writing code targeting a CPU I'd designed from the ground up for a computer engineering course. I, in my infinite boredom and genius, had earlier in the semester decided on a OISC transport-triggered architecture with extreme pipelining. The last thing I did for that class was toggle the program into an FPGA dev board using switches and a 7-segment display. Toolchain? What toolchain?The 'story of mel' is absolute nonsense glorifying a absolute shitty way to program. If you want abtractions and efficiency, may i direct you to a 'real' programing language like rust that isn't built on quicksand and ducktape?
Imagine being impressed at using a integer overflow to self modify code to a jump. No wonder he couldn't fix the bug. Not coincidentely, most operating systems and languages started to provide tools to forbid self-modifying code.
Given the hardware at the time they had the choice ofThey actually cared quite a bit about the bug that the other guy couldn't fix. This subculture adoration of 'programming monks' doing the unsafe thing at any cost is weird as hell, at any time.