[X] [SPIDER] The We can be a powerful military ally against the Skaven.
[X] [SPIDER] The We can be a powerful military ally against the greenskins.
Integration of the We with the population of Karak Eight Peaks is a little too hasty at this moment, and I do agree with VSH analysis that the success odds of that from either the Dwarven or Spider side is likely not very high.
[X] [UNDUMGI] Francesco Caravello, Tilean ex-merchant
This sounds like a logical choice, given that trade and defense is likely going to be the lifeblood of the Undumgi. This man is likely competent in both.
[ ] [UNDUMGI] Soizic, Bretonnian Questing Knight
Given the traditional antipathy of Bretonnian Nobility toward Ranaldites, with Ranaldites being regarded almost on the level of Chaos Worshipers, I have a suspicion that we'd have to go through a Roswita style roll for Soizic because of this, so it smells more like a "are you feeling lucky" option, as interesting as this option sounds. If it's 100, Soizic would be extremely open-minded for a Bretonnian. If it's 1, she'd regard us as barely better than a Chaos Cultist, and our shrine to Ranald as a grave heresy to be expunged from Karag Nar. No thank you, I don't want that dice roll where a bad roll means a huge AP drain in the future. In any case, I don't want to bound a wandering Questing Knight to an office that likely requires stable and long term leadership - it's not fair to her to be tied down to one place on that level, and it's not fair to the Undumgi. Hard pass, since Mathilde is a Ranaldite.
[ ] [UNDUMGI] Oswald Oswaldson, Imperial veteran
This man should be the Marshall, not the leader of Karag Nar.
[X] [ARMOUR] It should be reforged into a worthy commemoration of the Karak's rebirth.
[X] [RUNE] 25 Favour Sword
[X] [RUNE] A 25 favour sword to commemorate Mathilde's part the in retaking of Karak Eight-Peaks.
The narrative-based argument for this combination of options strongly convinces me of this combination. I don't think there's much more I can say that'd convince the opposition to the Armour vote, or to the 25 Favour Sword vote - the case has been made strong enough, and the arguments against it are valid opinions and interpretations to hold, but one I do not share.
[X] [LIBRARY] No purchase.
Why are we blowing through our fortune when we still have a penthouse to build? Sorry, no Purchase for me, until we get a clearer costing estimate of how much the Ideal Penthouse the thread wants should look like. We also need to reserve money for investment into our factory, and possibly expanding our fief. To me, a Library of Romance books, as hilarious as the idea sounds takes far lower priority than building the Penthouse, investing in our factories, attending to our fief, buying instruction in Greatswords or Buying College lessons - all actions that I suspect far more than 29 voters would want to do, all actions that would take money, money that I fear expanding the library now would force us to make hard decisions down the line for things that ironically might allow us to buy an even larger romance library in the future. No thanks, at this moment.
Also,
might I suggest that future purchases put upfront the Gold and Favour costs of the proposed purchase, with the vote as registered in the Vote Tally? It would be very helpful for questers to decide if the cost of the purchases are worth it IMO.
Edit: Approval voting this:
[X] [LIBRARY] Imperial Texts: Extensive/Esoteric Skaven, Extensive Skaven Magic, Extensive Greenskin Magic, Antiquarian Grey Magic (2 College Favor), Extensive Amber Magic, Extensive/Esoteric Linguistics, Extensive Warpstone, Extensive Morr, Extensive Karaz Ankor. Dwarf Texts: Extensive Greenskin Magic, Extensive Skaven Magic, Extensive Linguistics, Extensive Daemons
Because it drops my biggest objection to the library vote, the massive outlay on Romance books.
[X] [ENCHANTMENT] No purchase.
I want to see how the Chiselwand Spider situation develops before committing to purchasing enchantment.
[ ] [ENCHANTMENT] Items of Inspiration, Trial and Error, and Law of Logic (eight favours)
@spiritualatheist This one is interesting, but I think an 8 Favour Expenditure is something that needs much more discussion/argumentation/justification to gain any traction. Being an investment for better College Favour farming seems to me to be one of the stronger arguments this expenditure could be justified upon, though the how needs to be elaborated.