- Location
- Texas
I feel like with all that's been said, diplomacy seems extremely unlikely, and if we don't take care of these guys now, they will be a problem for us in the future.
I feel like with all that's been said, diplomacy seems extremely unlikely, and if we don't take care of these guys now, they will be a problem for us in the future.
This is the way.Alright, vote seems to be fairly clear. The Empire will once again shows its love of high explosive problem solving.
I think there's a difference between lava baths and multiple explosives detonating massively with metal shrapnel going at high kinetic speeds.So... is no one else thinking that a race that regularly bathes in lava might not be too bothered by explosives?
At the very least, the explosion should shred their wings.I think there's a difference between lava baths and multiple explosives detonating massively with metal shrapnel going at high kinetic speeds.
It's a bit clear the voters didn't think about any of that, or at least considered them acceptable collateral.What about civilian casualties, or giving the enemy a chance or a message to surrender
For the former they're literally unavoidable in a siege where we've been dropping bombs and the vast majorly of people will see it as an unfortunate pride that had to be paid for ending this awful war and as for the latter, we've been here for days and they could have surrendered at any point prior to this though Pegicles probably wouldn't let themWhat about civilian casualties, or giving the enemy a chance or a message to surrender
Quick question are the Crystal Knights and Diamond Dog knights serving in the campaign or were they left at home?
We've been sieging them for days, if they wanted to surrender they would have already. Also the tactics we've been using so far suggests that most of us, myself included, value the lives of our own troops and those of our allies more than the lives of civilians we're not responsible for. It might sound cruel but, if someone has to die I'd rather it be their people than ours.What about civilian casualties, or giving the enemy a chance or a message to surrender
Though more likely, the threshold is whenever the defenders would try and off their leader so they could surrender...We've been sieging them for days, if they wanted to surrender they would have already. Also the tactics we've been using so far suggests that most of us, myself included, value the lives of our own troops and those of our allies more than the lives of civilians we're not responsible for. It might sound cruel but, if someone has to die I'd rather it be their people than ours.
we're, after all, fighting a war with no rules against someone who has no qualms hiding behind his civilians, burning fields he can't control, or unleashing WMDs.We've been sieging them for days, if they wanted to surrender they would have already. Also the tactics we've been using so far suggests that most of us, myself included, value the lives of our own troops and those of our allies more than the lives of civilians we're not responsible for. It might sound cruel but, if someone has to die I'd rather it be their people than ours.
Not saying we shouldn't accept a surrender. I'm just saying that, based on the winning votes so far, most of us are probably not going to limit our options out of concern for civilians in a foreign nation that we are at war with. We'll try to help them when the fight is over but until then our own people's safety is more important.Though more likely, the threshold is whenever the defenders would try and off their leader so they could surrender...
which is completely fair, really.Not saying we shouldn't accept a surrender. I'm just saying that, based on the winning votes so far, most of us are probably not going to limit our options out of concern for civilians in a foreign nation that we are at war with. We'll try to help them when the fight is over but until then our own people's safety is more important.
I don't think they're mercenaries, it's been fairly strongly implied that they're just neighbours that decided to take advantage of the chaosI just thought of this, but has anyone else considered the possibility that the delaying tactic down where the Ursa was butchered was an attempt to buy time for recruiting dragon mercenaries which backfired?
I think they are neighbors that Pegicles planned on enlisting as mercs, but crit-failed his negotiation rolls.I don't think they're mercenaries, it's been fairly strongly implied that they're just neighbours that decided to take advantage of the chaos
I just thought of this, but has anyone else considered the possibility that the delaying tactic down where the Ursa was butchered was an attempt to buy time for recruiting dragon mercenaries which backfired?
I assume the plan was to send a guy from the camp to alert Pegicles that we were coming, but also assumed that the Ursa Major would either deal with us or severely weaken us in the process. Then Pegicles sent a messenger to have his relief force show up to pincer us. Unfortunately, his relief forces either were ambushed by the dragons on their way to Mare-a-thon or they had the unfortunate luck to run into the dragons while they were attacking some place else.I think they are neighbors that Pegicles planned on enlisting as mercs, but crit-failed his negotiation rolls.