It's far more likely than that they are a chaos cultist.
And more probably than that they are idiot who does not actually believe.
You seem to be doing the "they are not doing what i want them to do so clearly they are doing their religion wrong" bit, or not, i honestly can never tell when you are trying for somekind of IC improv and when you are actually discussing things seriously.
... Excuse me, what? I... I really cannot understand why people keep saying that... It is really not what I am doing, yet it seems like I keep giving that impression. Thing is , with religion, things can get complicated and questions can arise, and it seems like the mere fact I am aknowledging those questions pings others as me saying that "I know their religion better", which is not at all what I am doing. Not everyone who claims faith does everything right, and some are worse than others. It is why denomintions and different parts exist, and to say that I prefer one over the other, or that I'd rather one be more right than the other, or that I think a god is evil if they support a certain behaviour in a universe where gods are provably real, or that I think that based on quest info, a certain read of a god is probably wrong doesn't strike me as different than any other discussion.
Now, I apologise if I am kind of irate because nobody can explain to me what exactly I am saying wrong to give the wrong impression about what I am talking about, but it really seems to me like its the subject matter of religion that is violative and that people want to avoid discussing what a god is/wants in favour of just assuming gods are the sum of their cults and worshippers, even the hypocrites, and nothing else.
The Theogonist seems to have destabilised the Empire by focusing on a border dispute, denied help to an EC in their war against vampires and denied help to a dawi project. Those would need some heavy mitigating circumstances, and even if we accept that he is pragmatic and that he considered the vampire and dawi war to be wastes of life, he is gung ho participating in a waste of life destabilizing Empire border dispute without batting an eye. That strikes me as hypocritical at the very least, according to everything I know of Sigmar, and I am expressing that. I also mentioned multiple times that there could be extenuating circumstances and that he could be just incompetent, its just that being a politician is the most benign scenario and that extenuating circumstances are kind of hurt by Occam's razor, but should still be considered.
The dude seems to be violating 3 strictures, none of which seem capable of being read metaphorically in the situations presented , and go against the spirit of Sigmarism too. More investigation can prove that this assertion is wrong and operates on lack of info. But it is a reasonable assertion, not because I like telling others their religion is wrong, but because religions can be logically analysed just like everything else, and while multiple interpretations can exist, I am uncappable at present at finding one that absolves this guy. It could be that I am wrong and that there is one, like with the Marienburg Verenans, but I think that a logical answer about how he can operate that way is the way to go, rather than denying the fact that a conversation about religion, denominations, interpretations and the desires of gods can happen at all.
When the thread was trying to ascertain motivations for Borek, there was a lot of back and fro about his competence, and QM answering and explaining some stuff people who considered him incompetent haven't considered but no "he is not doing what i want him to do so clearly he is doing his expedition wrong" argument, even if people did think others were wrong to think him incompetent, because things merited discussion. Why is talking about fantasy gods different?
