Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
We could just put a pillow over his mouth. It's not like he'd be able to wake up or struggle, at that point, so that wouldn't leave any signs of violence.
Yeah, or not even a pillow. Just a small air-impermeable fabric of some sort. Better not to move any pillows. An accident kill like this is now very, very practical and viable. In a perfect world, he'd have some kinda sickness though. I still kinda want to go with the poison cause I want to hang out with Panoramia though.

Hell, Mathilde has a spell just for suffocating someone:
K / Throttling: Sends ropes of darkness a short distance to strangle the target. Lasts until you choose to stop or your concentration is broken.
- Without magical protection or supernatural toughness, the target is helpless from when the spell hits their throat.
- Can only be cast on living targets, and the ropes are insubstantial to everything but the target's throat, so it can't be interrupted except by magical means and can't be used to pull the target around.
Throttling, well, throttles. This has clear signs. A person dying from not enough air flow, but no resistance? That seems to be natural causes of some unknown nature.


Also, for the list of kill methods, there was the Skaven kill. Much easier and a better idea than Chaos cultist kill, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Hell, Mathilde has a spell just for suffocating someone:
K / Throttling: Sends ropes of darkness a short distance to strangle the target. Lasts until you choose to stop or your concentration is broken.
- Without magical protection or supernatural toughness, the target is helpless from when the spell hits their throat.
- Can only be cast on living targets, and the ropes are insubstantial to everything but the target's throat, so it can't be interrupted except by magical means and can't be used to pull the target around.
There's a decent chance throttling actually leaves marks, as it's physically strangling someone with shadows.
 
I'm partial to the "Mockery of death in the bath" idea mentioned earlier.
It's a death that provides it's own logical explaination, leaves minimal signs of outside interference and can be accomplished in a relatively private setting.
The only caveat is wether he actually bathes in anything large enough to drown in it.
 
Yeah, the throttling spell specifically goes in the general 'we can kill Boris by staring at him funny' pile of methods.

His chances of survival against Grey Lord Assassination, barring mystical intervention, are dismal, but most of the tricks in that pile tend not to meet the "deniable" or "undefiled" secondary objectives.

The Invisible Stalker method of slaying him sounds trivial, but it does have the hidden prerequisite of being one of the maybe one hundred people in the world capable of simultaneous (battle magic) teleportation and invisibility, while also not being one of those hundred people who'd resolve the issue by collapsing his whole bedroom into a gigantic interdimensional sink grinder and calling it a night.

It takes some truly tremendous skill to make our ability to kill people sound so effortless.
 
I'm partial to the "Mockery of death in the bath" idea mentioned earlier.
It's a death that provides it's own logical explaination, leaves minimal signs of outside interference and can be accomplished in a relatively private setting.
The only caveat is wether he actually bathes in anything large enough to drown in it.
Kings don't tend to take baths alone. But when they sleep, they sleep with other people sleeping at most.
 
My problem with battle magic is that if you keep rolling the dice, they're going to come up snake eyes eventually. But wiping a karak or similar with a single spell (or near enough) isn't something you keep doing. It's a singular event, and a really cool one. So for me, it's more like attacking the Black College, or the trip to the chaos wastes. It's undeniably risky, but really cool, and we did our best to mitigate the risk as much as possible (in the first case, using the night prowler, in the second by just being super mobile so she could have escaped on her own). In case of the cataclysm spell, it would be having the staff to make it not suicidal (high end battle magic can be cast semireliably), more experience with battle magic, hopefully being better at magic in general, blowing a powerstone if that helps, and maybe the fact that apparition binding spells can front load some of the risk.
High end Battle Magic can be cast semi-reliably by people who are used to Battle Magic. Mathilde is exceptional in terms of magic, but she is an outright novice when it comes to Battle Magic. Unless you're willing to spend a bunch of AP shoring up her Battle Magic skills, you're not going to get "semi-reliable". I'm 100% for that, but I'm not gonna vote for that so I can get one singular scene of Mathilde casting a Cataclysm spell and then just stop there. I would much rather we use a skill that we've learnt more than once.
 
Personally for the assassination attempt I think we should go the route of a method of killing that has too many potential suspects that it is difficult for them to figure out who did it.

Like if we went invisible and shot him while he was out of the city then it would do the job. Using a normal pistol makes it incredibly difficult because it would be trivially easy for any possible assassin to get a gun.

What about the invisibility pointing to us? Well if they don't know the person who shot him was invisible then they can't know about it. Then all they have to go on was that the Tzar was shot.

Now some of you might ask, wouldn't they know it was a pistol? Well maybe but maybe not, simply because odds are very few people would be able to tell the difference between a pistol shot and a rifle shot. Plus this is before forensics so there is precious little they can do with a lead bullet to narrow it down.

Plus Boris can then use this as fodder to eliminate some enemies and spur the military reforms using the outrage.
 
Now some of you might ask, wouldn't they know it was a pistol? Well maybe but maybe not, simply because odds are very few people would be able to tell the difference between a pistol shot and a rifle shot. Plus this is before forensics so there is precious little they can do with a lead bullet to narrow it down.
That does have the issue that Mathilde is equipped specifically with fairly advanced Dwarf pistols.

The bullets may be distinct enough for someone to point fingers at Dwarfs.
 
Personally for the assassination attempt I think we should go the route of a method of killing that has too many potential suspects that it is difficult for them to figure out who did it.

Like if we went invisible and shot him while he was out of the city then it would do the job. Using a normal pistol makes it incredibly difficult because it would be trivially easy for any possible assassin to get a gun.

What about the invisibility pointing to us? Well if they don't know the person who shot him was invisible then they can't know about it. Then all they have to go on was that the Tzar was shot.

Now some of you might ask, wouldn't they know it was a pistol? Well maybe but maybe not, simply because odds are very few people would be able to tell the difference between a pistol shot and a rifle shot. Plus this is before forensics so there is precious little they can do with a lead bullet to narrow it down.

Plus Boris can then use this as fodder to eliminate some enemies and spur the military reforms using the outrage.

Are we good enough with pistols to shoot a named character in one shot? Or are we just going to wound him and put him on his guard while his literal guard jumps to protect him.
 
Shooting for no suspects is probably better than definitely letting people be suspicious about the wrong suspects.

It's just higher on the survivability onion.
 
That does have the issue that Mathilde is equipped specifically with fairly advanced Dwarf pistols.

The bullets may be distinct enough for someone to point fingers at Dwarfs.
If I remember correctly, Mathilde mentioned that Dwarves use aerodynamic rounds as opposed to the round pellets the Empire uses for its bullets. Or she was referring to cannonballs. It was back in the first Drakenhof campaign, so it's been a while since I read that passage.
 
No mythological trope is universal, and anyone that claims otherwise is probably trying to sell you something.

I have always found the prevalence of vampires all over the place pretty interesting though, very different forms or no.

Gods and magic are understandably (near) universal to the human psyche. Pretty obvious why basically every culture has some or another form of these showing up (even if some gods seem indistinguishable from what other cultures may consider sorcerers). What most people today classify as dragons in ancient myths were basically 'big important monsters' with little else commonality between them.

Vampires... well they're hardly anyway near as common as those three, but 'life draining human derived and/or human appearing monster' is a bit less obvious to me? 'Life draining monster' or 'human derived and/or appearing monster' sure, but the combination of two shows up in a surprising number of very distant places. Sometimes makes me wish there were more fantasy universes where vampires were a wider description of being, where there's multiple unrelated beings that can all be described as vampire, as opposed to just different clans of the same type of being, like in Warhammer and many others. They exist, say Dresden Files and The Witcher come to mind, but more rare.

Secretly was kinda hoping the Cathay vampires were like that, completely unrelated to Nagash type vampires, though I don't believe that's the case. Still hoping there's some Jiangshi to them, they're neat.
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly, Mathilde mentioned that Dwarves use aerodynamic rounds as opposed to the round pellets the Empire uses for its bullets. Or she was referring to cannonballs. It was back in the first Drakenhof campaign, so it's been a while since I read that passage.

You're thinking of the artillery shells or 'cannonbolts' as mathilde mentally referred to them during the assault on Drakenhof Town.

One of the reasons she initially went for the dwarfen revolver is that they use the same ammunition style of powder and shot she was used to at the time rather than the specialised 'bullets' of the other options. Though she of course bought the marksdwarf pistol subsequently
 
IIRC, first time was around the time we got Mistery and inquiring minds started asking questions about battle magic and how far things could be pushed before things would become unsafe again.
Huh. I looked around that week and couldn't find it - do you have a link?
High end Battle Magic can be cast semi-reliably by people who are used to Battle Magic. Mathilde is exceptional in terms of magic, but she is an outright novice when it comes to Battle Magic. Unless you're willing to spend a bunch of AP shoring up her Battle Magic skills, you're not going to get "semi-reliable". I'm 100% for that, but I'm not gonna vote for that so I can get one singular scene of Mathilde casting a Cataclysm spell and then just stop there. I would much rather we use a skill that we've learnt more than once.
It's even worse than that - word of boney is that battlemages aren't just more reliable at casting BM because they do it a lot, it's because they're raised from childhood with the deliberate goal of them being a battlemage, and everything about how they're raised is bent towards that end.

There is nothing Mathilde can do to become as inherently (ie, ignoring equipment) reliable at casting that stuff as an actual on paper battle mage. They're minmaxed for it, we're not.
 
So thoughts on the Vladimir assassination, obviously this is all very general since we do not know what circumstances we are working with, but just as a vehicle for speculation pros and cons for various options mentioned in the thread:

Vanishing Tzar

Pros
+We can do it by whatever means we like, since we are not planning to leave any evidence, we could cut off his head with our sowrd and be done with it as long as we find him alone
+We can guarantee a clean death, or an honorable one if he wants to go down as a warrior and tell Boris that, it might make him feel a bit less terrible about the whole thing than some of the other things on here

Cons
-Uncertainty will make the transition of power harder for Boris
-Potential pretenders, how hard it is for say a Champion of Slaanesh to flesh-shape themselves into the guise of a dead man say?

Disguise (Skaven)

Pros
+We can use some Ulgu since we are playing a Clan Eshin assassin
+We aim attention away from ourselves and onto someone who can never clear their name because... well obvious reasons

Cons
-We need weapons, and warpstone
-Shooting is not Mathilde's best offensive skill by a longshot
-That post-cognition spell might be able to see through illusion, we do not know how spirits 'see'

Disguise (Champion of Tzeench/Slaanesh)

Pros
+It directs Kislev's anger at again someone who cannot clear their name
+It directs Kislev's anger at the actual present threat from the North
+We can use Ulgu since both of the above have Ulgu

Cons
-We would have to pretend to be a Chaos worshiper while we know at least one of the Gods is actively watching if not several of them, they might take the opportunity to act in some subtle manner
-We would be giving Chaos an actual win, unlike with the skaven the perception of their power might actually damn the souls of people who give in to despair
-That post-cognition spell might be able to see through illusion, we do not know how spirits 'see'

Open Poisoning

Pros
+Very few moving part, just put something in his food between when the food-taster tastes it and when he eats i (if Vlad even employs such a person)
+We can use common poisons that could be acquired anywhere and we have a trustworthy person to help with brewing it

Cons
-It is clearly an assassination and Boris is an obvious suspect just because he is the heir, he would be starting his reign under a cloud
-It could conceivably fail. This is warhammer 'X resists ten times lethal dose of hemlock until they make it to the priest to heal them' is not beyond the realm of possibility and on the off chance that happens follow up attempts just got harder

Fake natural causes

Pros
+If we can pull it off this is the smoothest possible transition
+It would be painless, he would just not wake up, just that little bit of peace to Boris

Cons
-Like open poisoning but harder since you need to fool investigators and Mathilde is not an expert, frankly I do not think Panoramia is either, 'how to seamlessly poison someone' does not sound like the kind of thing the Jades would teach as part of potions class
-If it gets discovered we are back to Boris being a suspect but worse since by the time it comes out he will already have committed to it being natural causes

Hunting Trip Gone Wrong

Pros
+It is entirely an in character way for Vladimir to die, more so than say dying in his sleep so you will have fewer people being suspicious and checking less thoroughly
+It is a form of 'natural causes' that you can have neutral witnesses to, making it all the stronger

Cons
-Moving parts... all the moving parts, the monster could faceplant, he could realize he is being manipulated/poisoned there are just so many ways this could fail to actually get the job done
-Mathilde is not an expert in wrangling dangerous beasts or the like

Anyone have thoughts? Other suggestions?

Fighting Vladimir head on seems like a good way to fail our assassination and very risky in general. He's been rushing from fight to fight for decades and is probably a monster in combat.

I'm somewhat confident we could defeat him if we ambush him and use Branalhune and our magic. However, any situation where we don't use our very distinctive sword style, magic and/or the element of surprise, things might get touchy.

To me, the real question in that case is just how dangerous is the Tzar. Heroes in the setting get pretty ridiculous and the Tzar seems pretty badass from a martial perspective.
 
We have no real idea how skilled he is in combat.

He always goes for a fight, but he might be more of a commander than a fighter in terms of how things turn out.
I'm of the opinion that the best options are, in order of preference
a) Die on a hunt to his prey (PR-friendly death, if it worked for Bobby B it can work here)
b) Die peacefully in his sleep (Not unreasonable, less trauma for Boris?)
c) Frame Chaos/Skaven/a Boyar that Boris wants to go after (might have unintended reactions from those not in the know)
d) Vanishing/Poison/Normal murder (Way too many questions and suspicion)

On a different note, I wonder what Boris!Quest looks like, that this was the option they chose?
 
I don't think there should be any real worry about them identifying our bullets in any case

For one thing bullets tend to deform and shatter then they hit bone, or pass through their targets and impact whatever hard surface is behind them

And for another forensics are a pretty limited field in this equivalent era and the chances anyone's going to dig around for small bits of metal on the suspicion that they'll be distinctive is pretty small
Sure Mathilde bothered to collect the bullets when we investigated the river bombing, but she's not typical

I'm more concerned with the fact that just shooting him means writing off all possibility of making his death look natural
Also the noise, guns aren't known for being quiet so we'd probably be exfiltrating in a hurry depending on circumstances


It's even worse than that - word of boney is that battlemages aren't just more reliable at casting BM because they do it a lot, it's because they're raised from childhood with the deliberate goal of them being a battlemage, and everything about how they're raised is bent towards that end.

There is nothing Mathilde can do to become as inherently (ie, ignoring equipment) reliable at casting that stuff as an actual on paper battle mage. They're minmaxed for it, we're not.
Boney didn't say that

@Boney was wondering, can we get this specialized training battle mages get with favor, or we have we just outgrow anything the colleges could teach about it ?
No. The training isn't something you can pick up in a classroom, it's more being moulded from a young age into a being whose entire purpose is to cast this very specific set of spells.

He was asked if we could get the specialized training that Battle Wizards did and the answer was no
He did not say that Mathilde could never pick up any traits for casting Battlemagic, it's just that she can't pick up those traits by studying in the classroom
 
Last edited:
Tangentially: the idea has been floated to me of making a similar post to cover our Stirland years. I've been unsure about whether people would get any actual use out of it, though; the original idea behind this project, when I did it for our time as Loremaster, was so that we could at-a-glance see how we had been spending our time in order to modulate future turnplanning accordingly, but that's obviously not a factor for the spymistress job. But I guess I don't know how many people actively go back and look at the K8P one, even though it's not relevant to the current quest; if it turns out reading summaries of old turns and not just the more recent ones is common, then that would alter my opinion.
I've done several rereads of the beginning of the quest, and have contemplated writing up a similar sort of post as you did for Loremaster, in order to help create a better timeline for overviewing things, but held off because I probably couldn't make it as useful and clear, as well as the issue of it being split between multiple posters making it harder to ensure continuity of editing and writing style.
 
On a different note, I wonder what Boris!Quest looks like, that this was the option they chose?
I'm imagining a series of bad diplo rolls to convince Vladimir to take Chaos seriously/do reforms/give Boris more leeway to do reforms on his own, with a preexisting set of maluses for Vladimir's general attitude and additional accumulating penalties for each previous failed attempt. Try long enough, and it doesn't matter if the PC is diplo-god themself when the penalty is all the way up to -70 or -100.

Add to that the fact that players know they're on a time crunch and keep getting forced to waste AP faffing around or on minor improvements, with all the good stuff locked behind getting Vladimir on board, and the thread eventually got desperate enough to seriously follow through on that one guy's seemingly crazy idea that started looking disturbingly plausible.

Also the noise, guns aren't known for being quiet so we'd probably be exfiltrating in a hurry depending on circumstances
Then again, we have Illusion. Perhaps we could use that as a silencing effect?
 
He was asked if we could get the specialized training that Battle Wizards did and the answer was no
He did not say that Mathilde could never pick up any traits for casting Battlemagic, it's just that she can't pick up those traits by studying in the classroom
I mean, if you're suggesting that there's a prospect for Mathilde to go back to being a young age so that she too can be moulded into a being whose sole purpose is to cast these spells, I guess there's a way?

Ways to reproduce the effects of the above tend not to... exist. That much. I'm not saying there's no way we can pick up one or two traits, never was, but what boney described was pretty extreme, so it seems rather implausible that there are practical alternatives for getting to the same level as they are.
 
Last edited:
Personally speaking, I use it as a handy index for when I'm trying to find a specific passage and I know the context, but can't remember the exact turn number. A "brief history of our time as spymaster" would be pretty helpful for that—I remember recently doing a lot of flicking back and forth trying to find the job interviews for the watch captain position. But I wouldn't want you to go out of your way to put one together, especially when I could just be not lazy and make one myself (speaking of which, I need to update my categorised bibliography post at some point, it's a few turns out of date now).
Fwiw I've made liberal use of your turn summaries, not just for planning discussions, but also when writing omakes—it's very useful to be able to sort out when exactly things happened to maintain consistency. Using Adela Quest as an example, the events are based around us hiring her on Turn 38, background details are filled in by our interactions with her on Turn 33 and 25 and during various duckling club socials, and the turn plan was stolen loosely adjusted from one of the earlier K8P/later post Stirland turns. Looking up details becomes much easier when they're indexed in a list and you have a general idea of where they are.
It's also pretty useful for finding reference in the quest. I often know under which action it happened, or what kind of action, but not when that action was.
I've done several rereads of the beginning of the quest, and have contemplated writing up a similar sort of post as you did for Loremaster, in order to help create a better timeline for overviewing things, but held off because I probably couldn't make it as useful and clear, as well as the issue of it being split between multiple posters making it harder to ensure continuity of editing and writing style.
OK, sounds like there's demand for it, even if it's not demand for the thing I was doing with the original version of the summary. I'm going to reread the Stirland portion of the quest to refresh my memory and then start working on it.
 
Back
Top