- Location
- Oklahoma
Solid rolls all throughout the Apparition process, then.
That's because we kinda caused them to attack in the first place.IIRC on the Dum expedition, blocking the daemons from hitting the Kislev villages wouldn't trigger it.
If you think about it, Apparition Binding is sort of like making a sentient magic item. Attached to your soul.Interesting, this is using our library's Enchantment bonus rather than its Apparitions bonus or even its Familiars bonus. Did we manage to make a magic item on the fly?
Interesting, this is using our library's Enchantment bonus rather than its Apparitions bonus or even its Familiars bonus. Did we manage to make a magic item on the fly?
The Iron Orcs are actively raiding Carcasonne, I'm confident we can get Protector to proc for at least the border villages.
Oh, I meant for any that we kill ourselves.Yeah but when do they raid? It might be the next raid isn't for months, and Mathilde wouldn't be physical stopping it either, she'd just be providing information that may eventually lead to raids being stopped. This is several steps removed.
Oh, I meant for any that we kill ourselves.
Just for providing info it probably wouldn't proc?
I'm skeptical most Iron Orc scenarios would actually proc the protector. The help provided would generally be too indirect. As an example that I think is even more direct but still wouldn't proc it. IIRC on the Dum expedition, blocking the daemons from hitting the Kislev villages wouldn't trigger it.
For providing info it'd probably have to be immediately relevant and actionable, something like Saint Grey warning Journeywizards about the Colleges being disbanded.Oh, I meant for any that we kill ourselves.
Just for providing info it probably wouldn't proc?
I reflexively cat-reacted this but also damn, with the way we and Johann have been rolling on this we aren't really leaving Ranald anything to do, are we?
The initial roll to capture it included a halved Enchantment bonus too.Interesting, this is using our library's Enchantment bonus rather than its Apparitions bonus or even its Familiars bonus. Did we manage to make a magic item on the fly?
It was a good action to put it on too, given the multiple rolls and the possibility for things to go wrong.I reflexively cat-reacted this but also damn, with the way we and Johann have been rolling on this we aren't really leaving Ranald anything to do, are we?
I guess maybe the Gambler will kick in on the stretch goal of "develop the basic summoning spell that deploys the Apparition with instructions", but if we crush that roll too without our oldest friend's help I will laugh and laugh.
Oh I see the disjunction here. That first once wasn't an Enchantment bonus, it was an Enchanter bonus. That is, Mathilde's personal Enchanter trait, not the library bonus. That's probably what this new roll is using.The initial roll to capture it included a halved Enchantment bonus too.
I mean, the "playing druchii against each other" is literally already on offer in the form of "snitch on raiders from another of the major cities because druchii don't actually get along" and again some of the sorts of payment that are available we ALREADY know don't really compromise mathilde's morals. Yeah when the actual negotations go down it's possible things will go worse than expected but we are not at a point where completely unobjectionable* really is not "very optimistic" at this point.All of those come under the heading of "Getting one over" to me.
The idea they would just give those away, without needing something that compromised mathildes morals massively is very optimistic.
Our scouting missions often finish with things on fire and quite a lot of enemies bisected, usually without us even trying. I prefer to hedge our bets and expect it to happen, at this point. Mathilde, and the thread, are rarely willing to stand by and let something happen if it's within our power to fix.
Like, if the Iron Orcs had bunch of slaves they were planning to work to death and then eat (presumably in that order), would we carefully scout them out and then tell Bretonnia so they could deal with it in the coming months/years, or would we improvise an immediate rescue/jailbreak? Especially after the guilt from Uzkulak.
That's the sort of thing Ranald's Protector face is all about.
Or perhaps on the 'how fast can you find one' roll, given that we asked and the Lights were like "there's one right there". A slight distinction from whether one is available at all.Ranald might have weighed in on a 'is there a Rider available to catch' roll.
...On a similar note, I wonder where the Gambler is going to apply for this action, if it is going to apply at all. Maybe things have gone smooth enough that Mathilde might go on to the 'actually make the spell to summon and guide it' phase? Or maybe it'll change how our specific Rider 'feels' about being bound and being given a new shape? Or maybe we'll have the luck to find yet another Rider? Who knows.
I mean last time he weighed in in the availability for testing to get it accepted. Maybe something like that will happen here too?Ranald might have weighed in on a 'is there a Rider available to catch' roll.
Normally the Gambler applies "where it is needed most", which means that it's possible that like last turn could happen, where we don't really need it and it doesn't apply directly to our rolls... but it's also possible this is a tiered success sort of thing and getting a result above 123 would be meaningfully helpful.So I wonder if Randal did anything to help with the gambler or we just will not see.
I think I recall a statement about how even if we don't get a bonus like we do from our Tower, the DC for learning spells is lower in the Grey College so technically it's about even. I imagine something similar could apply here.Theoretically, by doing the binding at the Grey College, Mathilde would have access to the College's library and facilities. But also, binding an Apparition is still an unknown and fraught process, so it makes sense that neither of those bonuses apply here.
Probably not getting a mastery out of it, nah. All the other spells we used a whole bunch before we got a mastery, and can't get masteries off spells you invent period.
We can't get a mastery out of it, in fact, because we are inventing the spell. Now maybe our invention could succeed early or better than expected or be a lower tier mastery, or it could just be a DC 100 thing.Probably not getting a mastery out of it, nah. All the other spells we used a whole bunch before we got a mastery, and can't get masteries off spells you invent period.
I think it's half our Trait bonus?Interesting, this is using our library's Enchantment bonus rather than its Apparitions bonus or even its Familiars bonus. Did we manage to make a magic item on the fly?