Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Why is Heidi the bad guy and Lutipold—who married the first politically convenient woman with a working womb—is painted as an innocent victim?

Lutipold needed an heir, and all of the choices had some sort of political strings attached—like being members of rival families, for example—and then here comes along a woman with no allies, no titles, no deeds, no enemies—nothing but the clothes on her back and a tragic backstory—and he snaps her up and puts a child in her belly, but it's okay, because she should be honoured to be the Emperors wife.
Pretty sure Luitpold was pretty upfront about being an Emperor needing an Heir.
Heidi entered the relationship with Luitpold willingly and with a plan: With her (Ranaldite) connections, she didn't have to marry to survive. There is no chance she was pressured into the marriage.

Heidi not having allies, titles, deeds or enemies makes it, more likely that Luitpold's affection for her is genuine, imo.
 
Not quite. You become royalty by doing a conquest. You become a noble as reward or payment from a royal or another noble. Elector Counts in the Warhammer Fantasy Empire are a bit more complicated because they are something in between royalty and nobility in practice.

The Emperor is called Luitpold. Wilhelm was the last Emperor of the real German Empire.
Wilhelm III is also Luitpold's grandfather*, who was the first Reikland emperor in the current succession.

*At least, I think he's his grandfather. He was definitely emperor 2 successions ahead of Luitpold (in between was a Mattheus II and Matthias IV, also from Reikland)
 
I personally find Heidi rather inspiring as a person. She was willing to put everything on the line for a better future, both for herself and her compatriots. If her plot didn't work she would be in an utterly miserable situation, if not outright dead. It's no worse than what Mathilde is doing right now with the Elves, letting them operate under assumptions and simply not correcting them and trying to get to a good end result somehow except Heidi has actually made concrete progress in her goals.

It's not like she deceived him out of something of actual material value either, it would have become extremely apparent if that was the case. Like, is it wrong for a Ranaldite to try to make lasting good change to the Empire through Ranaldite methods? Or do they need to.. like, be born as a noble or something?
 
Last edited:
It's no worse than what Mathilde is doing right now with the Elves, letting them operate under assumptions and simply not correcting them and trying to get to a good end result somehow except Heidi has actually made concrete progress in her goals.
I'm not saying she isn't doing good things and that it's bad for the Empire. But I would completely understand Luitpold if he was absolutely livid when hearing the truth like the Eonirs wouldn't be pleased.

Edit: and what she's doing is blatantly illegal too.

Like, is it wrong for a Ranaldite to try to make lasting good change to the Empire through Ranaldite methods?
No, but it's wrong to marry someone who probably loves you sincerely (because she hadn't really much to offer) under false pretences.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying she isn't doing good things and that it's bad for the Empire. But I would completely understand Luitpold if he was absolutely livid when hearing the truth like the Eonirs wouldn't be pleased.

The Eonir? Why would they care? At most I expect polite condolences sent to Aldorf and private pitying shakes of the head over the humans not being able to maintain proper records of their own nobles.
 
I'm not saying she isn't doing good things and that it's bad for the Empire. But I would completely understand Luitpold if he was absolutely livid when hearing the truth like the Eonirs wouldn't be pleased.

Edit: and what she's doing is blatantly illegal too.


No, but it's wrong to marry someone who probably loves you sincerely (because she hadn't really much to offer) under false pretences.
Well the only practical way she could have married Luipold under 'True Pretences' would have been to be born a noble.
 
Why is Heidi the bad guy and Lutipold—who married the first politically convenient woman with a working womb—is painted as an innocent victim?

Lutipold needed an heir, and all of the choices had some sort of political strings attached—like being members of rival families, for example—and then here comes along a woman with no allies, no titles, no deeds, no enemies—nothing but the clothes on her back and a tragic backstory—and he snaps her up and puts a child in her belly, but it's okay, because she should be honoured to be the Emperors wife.
Irrespective of what anyone in the thread thinks, members of the Empire's nobility invested in maintaining their inherited social status would 100% see Heidi as the bad guy and Luitpold as an innocent victim, and we do need to account for that when planning and discussing.

Unrelated to that point, I do think that lying about something you know your partner would care about is pretty skeezy even if the reason they care about it is bullshit, and that marrying or having sex with someone for basically cynical or mercenary reasons is fine as long as the other person is fine with it. I like Heidi and am willing to support her, but she is an ethically questionable character.
 
Last edited:
My personal view of Heidi is that she is in many ways the intrigue equivalent of an anti-hero, who delights in choosing very high risk, high reward intrigues which benefit others, but herself primarily. She is also very good at this and thus while was against working under Heidi I believe that she is a very good person to recruit and that she will enjoy such an affair.
 
And that's the important thing, apparently. I guess Heidi's true crime is striving above her station while being born to the wrong parents.
No, it's lying to the man she's marrying about all her life. I'm not saying she's evil, and maybe in her position I would have done the same. It doesn't change that she married a guy under false pretences. I'm not saying she's evil, but she's not in the right here.

What do you think she should have done?
I dunno, become a crime boss with a golden heart, create a commercial organisation like the EIC (who is headed by a unmarried woman), marry another Ranaldite? She's an intelligent and powerful person, who certainly had lots of money from her days as a « vampire ». She could have done many things.
 
Last edited:
And that's the important thing, apparently. I guess Heidi's true crime is striving above her station while being born to the wrong parents.
I wouldn't read too much into it. It's all about how you frame it, and if we look at it purely from the relationship lens, then yes, things can be questionable, just as if we look at every other character, we could find something to object to there. It's a credit to Boney's writing skills that everybody has interesting motives and strengths and qualities.
 
I dunno, become a crime boss with a golden heart, create a commercial organisation like the EIC (who is headed by a unmarried woman), marry another Ranaldite? She's an intelligent and powerful person, who certainly had lots of money from her days as a « vampire ». She could have done many things.
The more.. morally ethical thing Heidi should have done was.. create a …criminal... organization? I'll ignore that one. I think you seriously underestimate the difficulty of creating a successful commercial organization, and 'marry another Ranaldite' is... ugh.

Like, from Luitpold's perspective he was introduced to a woman who had just given up all her land claims for the good of the empire and otherwise had effectively nil resources. He had many options he could have chosen from, and asserting that he married her primarily because she was 'the last scion of the Haupt-Anderssens' instead of anything else is I think.. if true I think it says a lot about Luitpold, whereas more likely is that he concluded that she was convenient due to not tying him down to inconvenient political alliances with this or that noble house, or that he genuinely felt that someone acting for the good of the empire was a better match than other nobles, or that he genuinely fell in love with her and the Haupt-Anderssen story was simply a polite fiction.
 
The more.. morally ethical thing Heidi should have done was.. create a …criminal... organization? I'll ignore that one. I think you seriously underestimate the difficulty of creating a successful commercial organization, and 'marry another Ranaldite' is... ugh.

Like, from Luitpold's perspective he was introduced to a woman who had just given up all her land claims for the good of the empire and otherwise had effectively nil resources. He had many options he could have chosen from, and asserting that he married her primarily because she was 'the last scion of the Haupt-Anderssens' instead of anything else is I think.. if true I think it says a lot about Luitpold, whereas more likely is that he concluded that she was convenient due to not tying him down to inconvenient political alliances with this or that noble house, or that he genuinely felt that someone acting for the good of the empire was a better match than other nobles, or that he genuinely fell in love with her and the Haupt-Anderssen story was simply a polite fiction.

If she lied about her name and about her social standing she must have lied about most of her background. There isn't much overlap between 'high priestess of Ranald with a penchant for daring robbery' and 'last daughter of a noble house'. That said we have done worse as Mathilde, just not to people we were close to. This is an inclination to personal ethics over large scale political ones. Heidi lied to her husband about who she was to better millions of nameless and faceless Imperial citizens. Given the choice I suspect at least a large plurality of SV voters would not have made that choice.

Of course it also does not help that we have not seen Heidi... you know actually improve the lives of anyone other than herself with her little ploy. That is likely an artifact of the narrative focus not being on her, but still if you are sufficiently cynical about Ranald one can construct a world where Heidi does not care one fig for the common man and merely serves herself and her god, even at the cost of bloody war with Mariangurg if she must.
 
The more.. morally ethical thing Heidi should have done was.. create a …criminal... organization?
Hence the « golden heart » thing. I mean by that that she could create a Robin Hood-like organisation, who uses illegal methods to better the life of other people.

I think you seriously underestimate the difficulty of creating a successful commercial organization, and 'marry another Ranaldite' is... ugh.
She became empress, and before that managed to impersonate a vampire for 15 years while meeting other vampires. With a little help or Ranald and her fortune she definitely could have created a commercial organisation (and maybe even use it to support her criminal organisation). And what about marrying a Ranaldite? If she wants to marry someone, a person of the same religion as her isn't a bad option and she could tell him the truth about her past.
 
but still if you are sufficiently cynical about Ranald one can construct a world where Heidi does not care one fig for the common man and merely serves herself and her god, even at the cost of bloody war with Mariangurg if she must.
Also requires you to be pretty cynical about Shallya, or at bare minimum take a rather firm stance on unresolved questions like "how much influence do gods have over their magic once it's out in the world?"
 
Also requires you to be pretty cynical about Shallya, or at bare minimum take a rather firm stance on unresolved questions like "how much influence do gods have over their magic once it's out in the world?"

True, though Shayla would not necessarily have to be actively powerless. It could just be that Heidi did some favors to the cult of Shaylla which were 'good deeds' in the past and for that she got her life extension so she now just has it. There is a transactional element to faith in warhammer and the transaction as far as Shaylla is concerned could simply be done.
 
Heidi tangents are probably my least favorite argument cycle that revives itself everytime she's mentioned. It happens everytime where people argue about the morality of her actions and her marriage with Luitpold and its ethics. I like Heidi, but the sheer prevalence of this circular argument every time is exhausting. How many times have we gone through this already?
 
Heidi tangents are probably my least favorite argument cycle that revives itself everytime she's mentioned. It happens everytime where people argue about the morality of her actions and her marriage with Luitpold and its ethics. I like Heidi, but the sheer prevalence of this circular argument every time is exhausting. How many times have we gone through this already?

It is rather more relevant this time than others though, given that the current arc could end with her having to flee Aldorf in disgrace.

(Between a warning from Mathilde if things start to unravel and the favor of Ranald I do not think she could actually be caught and executed even in the worst case scenario for her)
 
It is rather more relevant this time than others though, given that the current arc could end with her having to flee Aldorf in disgrace.

(Between a warning from Mathilde if things start to unravel and the favor of Ranald I do not think she could actually be caught and executed even in the worst case scenario for her)
The actual morality and ethics of her actions don't matter to the current argument. We all knew from the start that if she's revealed she'll get kicked out. Nobody is arguing over whether people will forgive her for it. People are arguing over the real life ethics of it, which I'm starting to get sick of.
 
The actual morality and ethics of her actions don't matter to the current argument. We all knew from the start that if she's revealed she'll get kicked out. Nobody is arguing over whether people will forgive her for it. People are arguing over the real life ethics of it, which I'm starting to get sick of.

Eh... I think there were some arguments about how Lutipold would love her anyway and even apart from that 'is this character a good enough person to be worth saving?' is a valid question to ask. That said I do see how it could become tiring since morality is not something that is going to settle in a few short posts.
 
Hence the « golden heart » thing. I mean by that that she could create a Robin Hood-like organisation, who uses illegal methods to better the life of other people.


She became empress, and before that managed to impersonate a vampire for 15 years while meeting other vampires. With a little help or Ranald and her fortune she definitely could have created a commercial organisation (and maybe even use it to support her criminal organisation). And what about marrying a Ranaldite? If she wants to marry someone, a person of the same religion as her isn't a bad option and she could tell him the truth about her past.
Ah yes, the more morally ethical option is to repeatedly conduct significantly more morally dubious acts like stealing and create an organization to facilitate such activities. Or even more proper, stay within her proper social class that she was born into and marry someone of the same strata as herself. Next we'll assert that it was morally wrong for Heidi to have ruled under the false pretenses of a vampire for thirteen years and unjustly collect the taxes that were the rightful ownership of that vampire.

Like honestly how much injury, pain and suffering did Heidi actually cause in net to Luitpold? Like at the moment it's literally negative amounts of injury/suffering/pain inflicted onto him personally, and going further into the red with every passing year.
True, though Shayla would not necessarily have to be actively powerless. It could just be that Heidi did some favors to the cult of Shaylla which were 'good deeds' in the past and for that she got her life extension so she now just has it. There is a transactional element to faith in warhammer and the transaction as far as Shaylla is concerned could simply be done.
One also has to consider how hard such 'good deeds' are when the vast majority of individuals in the Empire pretty much will never hear about or get life-extension magic from her. Heidi might have made it sound easy, but they had to have been very difficult to pull off. At the very minimum it had to be significantly more exceptional than.. I'm not sure what the baseline is really.
 
Eh... I think there were some arguments about how Lutipold would love her anyway and even apart from that 'is this character a good enough person to be worth saving?' is a valid question to ask. That said I do see how it could become tiring since morality is not something that is going to settle in a few short posts.
Even if Luitpold loves her anyway, if the circumstances in which her identity is revealed occurs in such a manner that it's revealed to more than the Emperor, then she's out regardless. Nobles don't care about morality, they care about the status quo and their bottom line. A peasant and a charlatan sneaking her way into the throne is unacceptable and unforgivable.

I also don't see any arguments over people questioning whether "Is Heidi good enough to be worth saving?". The answer to that is yes when she decided to tie us to her son by making us his Godmother and when we decided to visit her several times, feed her useful information and give our godson a neighing horse, and tacitly agreed to be her accomplice in a Ranaldite plot. Not that she'll need saving, since she's a master at this kind of job, better than Mathilde even.
 
Ironically, if we'd taken the position of bodyguard, we might have ended up in this position trying to solve this exact issue, though with different impetus.
 
Back
Top