You've completely misunderstood the point of intervening. We can't save the city, but we sure as fuck can save its people.
No shit we can't save the city. But if we don't do something to at least delay its fall we aren't going to save many of the people either.
No see, the problem is that your definition of "save the city" requires us to do things the rest of us believe are impossible, like "win a land war in Samnium." Our definition of "save the city" requires us to do things we believe are merely difficult, but that result in the people of Kymai being evacuated to some other place.
Therefore, while many of us have very strong feelings about "how to save the city," our ideas and plans don't even register on your radar as "saving the city," so you just decide that no one else is even trying and you're the only one who cares and yell at us.
Then show me your plans to get enough Kymaians out of their city before the Oscans take it to still form a coherent citizenry without actually doing anything to delay the city's fall.
And if you're going to define "win a war with the Samnites" as "take any successful military action against them whatsoever" rather than the more normal meaning of "win a war with the Samnites" as "succeed in conquering Samnite territory or permanently halt their expansion," then either you're also going to need to accept that we're going to war with the Samnites, or you're going to need to accept that Kymai will fall as soon as the Oscans get bored of the siege and assault it.
I mean, I can at least respect
@Ironanvil1's position, because he thinks the attempt is doomed and that we have other things to focus on closer to home. But the rest of you, as best as I can tell, are currently working off the following plan:
1) Decide to save Kymai.
2) Do nothing to keep the city from falling to the first Oscan assault, because that would mean putting our soldiers at risk.
3) Somehow save everyone anyway, despite our inability to move substantial numbers of civilians quickly.
If I'm misreading what you're planning, then maybe you could post a coherent idea for what to do so that we all have something else to work with? Because right now I'm not seeing much on that score.
You can extend the siege for a while depending on your choices. You just kept throwing out insane ideas, my man
And you have at least three years to evacuate them anyway.
If somebody has more sane ideas to present, I'd love to hear them. Seriously, I would, because I know my plan is a big gamble (although I still think it could work, or at the very least that the idea of going after the enemy's food rather than their troops is sound when we don't have the numbers or skill to fight them in open battle but also don't have to do more than just delay their conquest of the remaining bit of Campania). But right now it's just a lot of silence and crickets on that front.
Also three years is how long Kymai has before it starves to death. Given what you've told us about the number of soldiers they have left compared to the number of Oscans besieging them, I'm seriously doubtful that the Oscans are going to wait for starvation to win the city for them, and the only question is how long it takes for the Oscans to realize that they have a reasonable chance of just overwhelming the garrison if they launch an assault.