Deadly Snark
Tryhard As Fuck
Alright fair, but the point remain a lot can happen in a year and with how the political situation has shifted abroad, who knows how things might shift at home.
Alright fair, but the point remain a lot can happen in a year and with how the political situation has shifted abroad, who knows how things might shift at home.
Huh. This actually brings up a question -- how would it be seen if a citizen provided arms to another citizen? Like, say, a wealthy hoplite or an aristocrat helping a few of his psilloi friends buy slightly better gear (but still psilloi tier)?There's a small group of Psilloi, I'd guess something like 500-1000, who are something akin to Roman Hastati in that they're too poor to afford a panoply but wealthy enough to afford javelins, missiles, or meager armor. Our boy Hermesdora Eretriazenis would be part of this group.
Do you still happen to have that Burning Bad one? I just took a look at the ones in the first thread after this pleasant reminder of their existence but it seems that that one has been lost.
Huh. This actually brings up a question -- how would it be seen if a citizen provided arms to another citizen? Like, say, a wealthy hoplite or an aristocrat helping a few of his psilloi friends buy slightly better gear (but still psilloi tier)?
Could we afford that? Would the Ekdromoi and our professions soldiery accept the idea of us spending state money arming other troops?As in, the Eretrian state promises to give every man a shield,
And I acknowledged that in the first reply I gave you I believeAlright honestly I dont want to spaghetti this. So I will just say thats my position. I dont believe like you do that we can say for sure which Deme will be better for what at this current time. A lot can happen in the years that remain in this term and even during the year of the election, things which can shift the calculus, who runs for office and what policies are proposed.
And I stipulated that I was using the knowledge we had at the moment.Something may pop up at the last second, that's true, but using the info we have now?
That's not necessarily the issue, because I think the Hoplites might protest more. Since their status is literally based on being able to buy their own Panoply, and thus the city arming others can easily been seen a degradation of their status as the core of the citizen army.Could we afford that? Would the Ekdromoi and our professions soldiery accept the idea of us spending state money arming other troops?
They already refuse to accept the idea of Mercenaries, and this is by far a step down, but such state expenditure on a military force outside of themselves could be seen as a threat by them no?
That makes a lot of sense, yeah.Aristocrats just don't really have the money. War is expensive for them and they need to cover a lot of the expenses of their horses or supplies themselves so the city can spend most of its war budget on the poorer hoplites and psilloi.
Ekdromoi IOTL originated from the Peloponnesian War, and other new skirmisher types would be created in the constant raids and small scale battles that accompanied the larger clashes of the conflict.Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't lighter forces become more popular as a result of the Peloponnesian War due to the prominent role of skirmishers and the like? So developing better psilloi and other such skirmishers would be ideal.
I do like the idea of a Sacred Armory, because it is useful.
But I think you can probably guess why I am also wary of the idea, since it starts to slide into the "Commanders buy equipement for their troops" thing, which is useful for a military. But potentially dangerous for a Democracy in the Ancient World.
That's not necessarily the issue, because I think the Hoplites might protest more. Since their status is literally based on being able to buy their own Panoply, and thus the city arming others can easily been seen a degradation of their status as the core of the citizen army.
Which it absolutely did historically.
In the context of Rome, you had essentially tens of thousands of basically homeless but extremely proficient soldiers, who had all lost their farms due to rising inequality, who were equipped and fed largely out of the personal fortunes of various "Great Men", which they were able to afford to do because of the aforementioned inequality. That's quite a different dynamic, I think.
Actually I was highly impressed by his actions in Sicily, especially the doddering old man act. I feel it's a genuine shame that his diplomatic accomplishments there will be overshadowed by some Athenian pretty boy, and I can genuinely respect that he didn't let said pretty boy get in his pants, all whilst likely also giving him a thing about getting rejected by Older Men.No offence @McLuvin, but I feel like Obander could in fact be the Son of Zeus come to Earth, and you would still not want him as our xenoparakletor
Could we afford that? Would the Ekdromoi and our professions soldiery accept the idea of us spending state money arming other troops?
They already refuse to accept the idea of Mercenaries, and this is by far a step down, but such state expenditure on a military force outside of themselves could be seen as a threat by them no?
That's not necessarily the issue, because I think the Hoplites might protest more. Since their status is literally based on being able to buy their own Panoply, and thus the city arming others can easily been seen a degradation of their status as the core of the citizen army.
Which it absolutely did historically.
The reason why those soldiers became homeless is because they were levied so bloody often for waging the Republic's wars. Landholder citizen-soldiers are all fine and well until they're at war so often that their farms fail and they go into debt from being away at war.No offence @McLuvin, but I feel like Obander could in fact be the Son of Zeus come to Earth, and you would still not want him as our xenoparakletor. :lol
This is a very good concern to have, I think, and entirely justified given the historical record. However I think one thing that could help mitigate it in this context is that it will be a Sacred Armoury, not a personal one; the state is providing a token to her citizens in to honour their sacred duty to fight to defend her.
In the context of Rome, you had essentially tens of thousands of basically homeless but extremely proficient soldiers, who had all lost their farms due to rising inequality, who were equipped and fed largely out of the personal fortunes of various "Great Men", which they were able to afford to do because of the aforementioned inequality. That's quite a different dynamic, I think.
Would it be reasonable to say that perhaps a few wealthier hoplites might look to show their Megaloprepeia by purchasing slightly better gear for a handful of their closest psilloi friends and supporters?I don't think supplying equipment is necessarily beyond the pale. Cities became far more regular and standardized in their citizen forces in the 4th century BCE. However it is a lot of money, and in the eyes of most of the demes the city would be better off keeping a bigger discretionary budget or expanding the ekdromoi to 750 or even 1,000 men, which would allow it to be a more effective marine force, especially if the city wishes to expand its navy.
Pretty sure this is the image. https://fortunedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/51635755.jpgDo you still happen to have that Burning Bad one? I just took a look at the ones in the first thread after this pleasant reminder of their existence but it seems that that one has been lost.
Would it be reasonable to say that perhaps a few wealthier hoplites might look to show their Megaloprepeia by purchasing slightly better gear for a handful of their closest psilloi friends and supporters?
(I have a few particular ideas in mind for the RP I'm going to be doing with Theopilos the Younger, and I want to make sure they pass the GM sniff-test. Assuming that you particularly want that level of players doing things in RP aside from debating in the ekklesia.)
Pretty sure this is the image. https://fortunedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/51635755.jpg
Perfect, thank you!I mean, it's not a problem from an RP perspective, I just won't institutionalize it or represent it mechanically
True, but given Eretria's earlier invention of the ekdromoi, perhaps our neighbors have also given thought to improving their non-hoplite forces? Taras for example could have given thought to such things, given their desire to defeat us.Ekdromoi IOTL originated from the Peloponnesian War, and other new skirmisher types would be created in the constant raids and small scale battles that accompanied the larger clashes of the conflict.
However, I'm not sure how many have been invented yet specifically off the top of my head, and these ideas are all the way over in Hellas itself, and, unlike Athens, Eretria doesn't feel the need to steal ideas for new military tech. At least not yet.
How exactly are the ekdromoi armed and armored? Does the city give out contracts to independent craftsmen for their weapons and armor, or are there state-owned weapon makers and the like? Because if it's the latter, then increasing the number of ekdromoi could end up being a good first step to providing weapons and armor for Eretria's other troops.I don't think supplying equipment is necessarily beyond the pale. Cities became far more regular and standardized in their citizen forces in the 4th century BCE. However it is a lot of money, and in the eyes of most of the demes the city would be better off keeping a bigger discretionary budget or expanding the ekdromoi to 750 or even 1,000 men, which would allow it to be a more effective marine force, especially if the city wishes to expand its navy.
How exactly are the ekdromoi armed and armored? Does the city give out contracts to independent craftsmen for their weapons and armor, or are there state-owned weapon makers and the like? Because if it's the latter, then increasing the number of ekdromoi could end up being a good first step to providing weapons and armor for Eretria's other troops.
Only if we let it happen.I feel it's a genuine shame that his diplomatic accomplishments there will be overshadowed by some Athenian pretty boy,
On the one hand, I agree Obander needs some recognition, on the other I don't think what he did was quite worthy of getting his name on the Athenian statue, and thus I am wary he'd get the majority needed for this.Thus I nominate Obander to be honored with the Wreath of Apollo.
On the one hand, I agree Obander needs some recognition, on the other I don't think what he did was quite worthy of getting his name on the Athenian statue, and thus I am wary he'd get the majority needed for this.
I'll vote to support this, but reserve the right to go against it should the risk of him getting the Athenian award occur.
Didn't Obander argue against these honors? Seems rather gauche to award him one when he didn't want them in the first place.Thus I nominate Obander to be honored with the Wreath of Apollo.
So says Tychaus the Aristoi