On the other hand, our best path to building up the naval power to tackle Korinthos head on is to have more colonies with decent fleets. So you want to turn away from such investments in actually being able to tackle Korinthos and turn towards vanity projects?

Yeah, look, there are arguments in favour of the oracle coming to Eretria, but this really isn't one of them.
OOC: I dont see how the spread of the Cult of the Divine Marriage factors into that build up phase. Thats more a matter of income from trade and taxes and the manpower to sustain a gradually but constant military build up. Something that we are already helping with the Linos Law.

I also dont see where I talked about vanity projects?

The Argument is basically if the Sybil goes, Korinth has a good chance of killing her when they come. But if she is in Eretria, she will be protected by one of the greatest cities in the region and one that takes a True Hegemon to break, which Corinth is not.
 
Last edited:
OOC: Okay wow, getting a little aggressive here. I merely said you were taking the metaphors too literally. Also I didnt start the metaphors talk, I was replying to someone else who started using the metaphors as an argument.

So please lets not start the ''You started this'' bullshit and let the RPing get personal.
Okay, so that wasn't aggressive, not at all, if you misread that as so aggressive, I apologise.

But here's the problem, after accusing me of being aggressive you then miss what I said, to them accuse me of 'you started this bullshit'
Read:
You were one of the ones speaking in metaphor.
I clearly identify you as one of several people, at no point did I accuse you of instigating the original use of metaphor or claim you were the only one using it, my main complaint was that you accused me of ignoring the realities behind the metaphor, whilst dismissing the argument I was laying out via my metaphor completely and utterly.

After looking back, and reading your first reply, which addressed not a single one of the points I put forward in my metaphor I then realised I had to go completely OOC and spell out what I meant, because you didn't seem to understand, despite having been willing to use metaphor in retaliation to someone else already.
Do you think that the Renovated Temple of the Divine Marriage is a pointless thing of stone? No it isnt. Its a monument to the glory of the gods which will spread our prestige. The Sybil is the same. Her presence alongside the temple will simply add to our prestige and allow its spread amongst our neighbors. For all across the known world understands the importance of an Oracle and take her words and her beliefs to heed, through her presence and her words and the able leadership of our deme our influence will increase so long as we work upon it.

This much is known. Unless you wish to say that the glory of the Temple of the Divine Marriage matters not, but I shall not accuse you of such a crime, for all here knows of your piety Ajax.

But I will counsel you to take a step back. For you now talk of dreams of Empire, beyond that of Hegemon. You speak of a path that will see us walk down the same path as the hated Medes, when their fleets burned a path of destruction through Hellas, leaving our fathers homeless. And then lossing hundreds of thousands of fathers, brothers and sons when the fury of the Hellenes united crashed down upon them. Already we see in Mainland Hellas the folly of Empire seize the Athenai, and now look upon them. Their Polis afflicted with the plague by the gods for their Hubris. Their allies revolt by the scores. Their citizenry and treasury bleeding dry in their endless war with Laikedaimon. Perhaps they shall win that war, perhaps not, but in the end Athenai will be devastated all the same.

That is not a fate I wishes for the Sons of Eretria.

An Empire does not build noble Ajax. All it knows is to consume. The Medes squeezes their satrapies until the stone themselves cry red with blood. The Silver Fleets of Athens extracts an extraordinary amount of tributes from their allies at the point of the sword, to the point that once might and proud Polis, with fleet footed Hoplites and solid ships to carry their will. Now reduced to famished skeletons who can only gnaw uselessly at their oppressors.

That is not a fate I wishes for our brothers and friends in the Epulian League.
You claim the Medes will run out, Athenai will fall, that we will be here when they are gone, you crow you victorious and self aggrandising, ignoring the realities.

Athenai, Laikdaimon, The Persians, all of them will be here when we are gone, just as they were here before us, we even now send a delegation because we are weak and need assurances we will not be swept aside.

You claim they do not build, but I Look at the great temples, harbours, cities and monuments they have made, ones grander than even our Hill, ones that we cannot yet match. And I name you false.

You speak of these Empire's inevitable destruction, yet they are older and more powerful than Eretria is, both old and new combined. You criticise their hunger, but is not that hunger already inside us? Did we not already break the Iapgyians for our own hunger? Did we not spill Illyrian blood for our own hunger? Did we not slay Tarantine Hellene for our own Hunger?

You speak of the glory of the Temple, of the prestige it has given the Divine Marriage and Eretria, where then are the flocking pilgrims? Even just across the Adriatic they know not of the Union. They know not of the matrimony if Athena and Apollon. They ask to swear oaths upon Zeus!!!

You make many assumptions, many promises, many harsh words for those stronger than us. Yet none of them have yet been shown to be true.

You call Athens slave masters. Mayhaps, but what of Sparta, are you so quick to speak of their tyranny of their fellow subjects? How long has the League of Laikdaimon stood, an Empire in all but name, but built in the back of better kindness and cooperation. You spit on Empire, yet use only Athens tyranny, not its prosperity, nor Sparta's Hegemony for your words. And though the Medes are tyrants, they have accomplished more than us, I recall tales of our shame, forced to flee by their hand, forced to prostrate before them to beg for our captured kinsmen.

Never again.

Eretria has the potential to be mighty enough to need never flee again, Eretria has the ability to spread its good nature and strength across the Adriatic and Epulia, to create a Union Of Greek sons and Barbaroi servants that can withstand any new invader, wether they be Mede, Phoenician or Hellene.

I want a strong Eretria, so we may never have to leave our home again.

I want a strong Eretria so we may never have to beg and scrape and now again.

I want an Eretria with many friends and children and servants under its aegis, so that we can stand united under the light of the Divine Union. One Union, One League, One Eretria
 
Last edited:
I clearly identify you as one of several people, at no point did I accuse you of instigating the original use of metaphor or claim you were the only one using it, my main complaint was that you accused me of ignoring the realities behind the metaphor, whilst dismissing the argument I was laying out via my metaphor completely and utterly.

After looking back, and reading your first reply, which addressed not a single one of the points I put forward in my metaphor I then realised I had to go completely OOC and spell out what I meant, because you didn't seem to understand, despite having been willing to use metaphor in retaliation to someone else already.
OOC: No I understood them completely. I am RPing dude, which means being a Greek Orator who takes your arguments and flourishes them to another point. If I wasnt RPing, I would be entirely for the Cultural Empire Route, I am fucking Chinese, that is literally my bread and butter. My inner self laughs at the idea of tiny little cities of mere thousands and their dreams of their city states being worth anything by merely being a city state that looks down on other cities.

But that is both disrespectful, and not very fun.

I will reply to the rest of your post later, if I can get back into the IC mindset of a Ancient Greek.
 
I don't know why people keep saying that the Grand Mantis is obviously rigging things. I have said multiple times that the system is not being rigged, and in any case the Grand Mantis is a sortition position which gets switched out every four years.
Personally always figured that there wasn't a concerted rigging effort, but they ARE influenced strongly by their native culture, which means most auguries tended to fall within the set of things which a Citizen can accept is plausible.

When Rome takes Veii in 396 BCE it also takes home Juno Regina, Etruscan Uni, and literally deprives the city of its spiritual patron.

[Rome's Avatar goes Omochikaeri]
 
Last edited:
OOC: I dont see how the spread of the Cult of the Divine Marriage factors into that build up phase. Thats more a matter of income from trade and taxes and the manpower to sustain a gradually but constant military build up. Something that we are already helping with the Linos Law.

I also dont see where I talked about vanity projects?

The Argument is basically if the Sybil goes, Korinth has a good chance of killing her when they come. But if she is in Eretria, she will be protected by one of the greatest cities in the region and one that takes a True Hegemon to break, which Corinth is not.

Because the move that strengthens the Divine Marriage most is also the move that results in a bigger Nea Kymai that can send more ships to join our fleets in time of war, which vastly increases our ability to sink the ambitions of Korinthos.

As to vanity projects, your IC arguments seemed to see having the oracle in Eretria as mainly being a way to augment Eretrian prestige. Hence, a vanity project that doesn't give us more ships.

And I'm not so sure that Korinthos would be unable to break Eretria. Last we heard, their fleet was more than 3 times the size of ours (if they don't expand theirs, once the Linean fleet expansion is done it'll be more like 2 times the size of ours). Even if they can't break Eretria by siege, which I wouldn't count on, simply driving us from the seas would be enough to oblige us to take a humiliating peace.

And yes, we have allies in Thurii, Krotone and the Sikeliote Leage, but Korinthos has allies like Argos and Sparta. There's plenty of room for us to meet a terrible fate if Korinthos has some luck or just gets the drop on us when we are distracted and they are not.

Since the oracle being in Kymai means that we get more ships and more reliable ships, I don't think it is fair to say that her being in Kymai means the Korinthians will just come along and kill her.

fasquardon
 
[X] [Prophecy] A Tree of Stone, growing in a newly planted grove upon the ashes of ancient monuments [-250 Kymaians go to Nea Kymai, -70 talents, Sibyl will go to Eretria Eskhata, Eretria Eskhata will gain an oracle and cultural influence].
 
Because the move that strengthens the Divine Marriage most is also the move that results in a bigger Nea Kymai that can send more ships to join our fleets in time of war, which vastly increases our ability to sink the ambitions of Korinthos.

As to vanity projects, your IC arguments seemed to see having the oracle in Eretria as mainly being a way to augment Eretrian prestige. Hence, a vanity project that doesn't give us more ships.

And I'm not so sure that Korinthos would be unable to break Eretria. Last we heard, their fleet was more than 3 times the size of ours (if they don't expand theirs, once the Linean fleet expansion is done it'll be more like 2 times the size of ours). Even if they can't break Eretria by siege, which I wouldn't count on, simply driving us from the seas would be enough to oblige us to take a humiliating peace.

And yes, we have allies in Thurii, Krotone and the Sikeliote Leage, but Korinthos has allies like Argos and Sparta. There's plenty of room for us to meet a terrible fate if Korinthos has some luck or just gets the drop on us when we are distracted and they are not.

Since the oracle being in Kymai means that we get more ships and more reliable ships, I don't think it is fair to say that her being in Kymai means the Korinthians will just come along and kill her.

fasquardon
OOC: I think its entirely fair. While a bigger Nea Kymai can be useful once its build up, the problem is it having the time to build up. The economy for a mighty fleet and a enormous stone wall and grain stockpiles to last in a siege takes years to build up. Just as the Eretria of the past was powerless against Kerkyra because we just didnt have a strong wall and fleet yet at the time, even though nowadays we can push them back without much issue.

And its not guaranteed at all that Nea Kymai will get the time to grow into such a power before Corinth comes. Thus its a pretty fair argument. Besides, when people talk about prestige IC, for a Polis prestige also brings more trade and monetary tributes from people who want to come see the Oracle, which is money we can invest in our own fleet.

Korinth is a regional power so if it absolutely wanted to break us I assume it could yes. But it would take far more effort from it to break an established Eretria than the newly settled Nea Kymai. And the effort it would have to invest is the kind of thing that can make the difference for a defender.
 
Last edited:
I understand the desire to create deeper cultural ties with the league but, at the same time, I do believe we shouldn't be overly dramatic about the present situation either. Appart from Epidauros and Melaina Kerkyra we don't have any issues in that regard, and we are talking about two cities who until very recently conducted most of their commerce through, and where intimately linked with, Kerkyra and Corinth, where the Divine Mariage was never much of a thing to start with so in retrospect it isn't that surprising it hadn't taken root with them yet.

Now, some have stated that putting it in Nea Kimai would see it get a foothold in Greece but, frankly, I remain sceptic of the idea. After all, Delphi is closer and they have allot of cities whose cultural imprint is greater then what both Eretria and Nea Kimai have in term of cultural output so I don't see it having much of an effect outside of the Adriatic region proper.

On a broader point, I do feel we shouldn't exagerate the danger of navigation and its geopolitical and cultural effect either. I doubt Likai would have been a thing if the Kerkyran felt obligated to sail all around the whole Adriatic to reach it, for one exemple.

If that's so it turns me more against the option. I'm not a fan of these ideas of becoming hegemon of Italia. Or even going far out of our way to boost our prestige among the Italiotes. In my view, our focus should be on the Adriatic. Dominate the Adriatic and we'll have the wealth and power that we MUST be respected. Get drawn too deeply into the games between the other Greek cities, and we'll draw jealous eyes against us that will work harder to oppose us the more successful we are.

Building up our power in the Adriatic would be easier, yes, and its a fair argument to focus in that direction but low risk also mean lower rewards. Corinth once dominated the Adriatic almost entirely and then some but it always remained a second tier power. Being hegemons of Italy would vault us into the category, of well, hegemons.

Now, that shouldn't be constructed as saying we should entirely focus on the italiote cities either but, and I suppose this is large point I was hitching to make since a while, neither should we focus entirely on one area.

The main issue with the Demes in foreign policy is that they all have their pet geopolitical theaters. The Drakonids swear by the Adriatic, the Antipatrids by our fellow Greeks in the west and, to a lesser extent, in Hellas and the Exoria would turn decisively toward the Italian hinterland. The issue is, this short of privileging one theater is a bad idea, no matter which one it is. Eretria has three geopolitic theaters, four if you have Greek italy and Sicily being separate ones, and they all come with important opportunities and dangers that we, as players, need to all weight carefully when making our decisions calls.

Sometimes one theater will be more important, sometimes another will take center stage but adopting some short of ''theater X is the priority and everything else is secondary'' outlook on things, like some tend to have with the Adriatic, will shoot us in the foot as it won't make those other theaters being less important simply because we believe it to be so.
 
Last edited:
An Oracle is a gift from the gods for our piety and kindness. One cannot farm or hunt for an Oracle. One cannot trade for or build an Oracle. This is a Devine opportunity and I would not see Eretria squander this magnificent chance to showcase the true talents of our Divine Father Apollo in Prophecy as we do our Divine Mother Athena in our strategic displays at war and the excellence of our Hieros Ekdromoi.
 
Last edited:
OOC: I dont see how the spread of the Cult of the Divine Marriage factors into that build up phase. Thats more a matter of income from trade and taxes and the manpower to sustain a gradually but constant military build up. Something that we are already helping with the Linos Law.
The Linos Law is exempted here and with the precedent having been damaged this early on it's much more likely to be challenged or limited later. In light of how we won't have these familial ties between Kymai and the rest of the league, promoting cultural bonds seems best; being in favor of the Divine Marriage gives them less of a feeling of being around strangers, and if they are a local center they may more readily persuade their neighbors.

As to manpower and money, letting them hold onto their Sibyl grants them 1250 differential in settler who would otherwise perish. Since they're not going to see substantial immigration that seems like an important shot in the arm if we want them to be militarily capable, it's icing on the cake that they get more closely bound to us even as they increase in number for this one option.
 
"So speaks Glaukommes, son of Perixeontes:

Fair-spoken Phokion Aristedeis speaks with a tongue of Hephaistos-forged gold. A flexible diplomatic policy is necessary for furthest Eretria to truly stand proud in Epulia and for that to be the case, this hallowed assembly must ensure that the Xenoparalektor is capable of acting swiftly and steadily but at the people's pleasure. Therefore, I can speak nothing but approval of his plan for the Xenoparalektor's office and our diplomatic policy.

As for Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros, they must be made to swear oaths to the Divine Marriage. On this subject, there can be no compromise. The Marriage is sacral, integral, to our league and cannot be compromised on. Just as Athena is a faithful wife to Apollon, so must the poleis of our league be faithful to Eretria, be faithful to the League. The Epulian League is built on the foundation of that Marriage, and compromising it is tantamount to infidelity, to crimes against the very gods we honour. The oath must be preserved.

However, just as Athena is a faithful wife, so is Apollon a faithful husband. Therefore, it seems only right that we grant them land in good measure and fertile fields upon which they can sow their seeds. Let the entire League swell with their citizens and let their joy be our joy and our joy be their joy.

As for the honoured Sibyl, I have contemplated hard and found wisdom in both ways. That is only natural, the Sibyl saw them both after all, therefore to suggest that one would be worse than the other would be tantamount to spitting on her prophetic prowess - madness! Therefore, I consulted with the Grand Mantis and cast into the river a loaf of bread. He told me that should the bread sink, I was to cast my vote in favour of the tree of stone and should it be washed up, I was to cast my vote in favour of the sapling of wood. And behold! The bread sank! Therefore, I know that the gods wish me to vote for the tree of stone.

However, with regards to the Sibyl, understand that I fully accept a different ending of this most contentious of decisions. Regardless of what decision wins at the floor of the Ekklesia today, know that you have chosen wisely Eretria. "

[X] [Motion] Phokion's Amendment. The Xenoparakletor will have one deputy chosen at their leisure and approved by the Popular Tribunal.
[X] [Missions] Flexible diplomacy prioritizing breadth and the ability to address multiple issues over focus. [2 missions from winning Demos, then ability to choose 1 more from the losing slates per term].
[X] [Oligarchs] Kymai must be made anew and bury old hatreds [+400 Kymaians go to Nea Kymai, city may have more wealth and political conflict in early years].
[X] [Prophecy] A Tree of Stone, growing in a newly planted grove upon the ashes of ancient monuments [-250 Kymaians go to Nea Kymai, -70 talents, Sibyl will go to Eretria Eskhata, Eretria Eskhata will gain an oracle and cultural influence].
[X] [Oaths] Make Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros swear oaths to the Divine Marriage [Cities will be unhappy but Epulian League oath will be preserved].
[X] [Lands] Grant additional lands to Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros [Both cities will be granted new lands by Eretria and grow in population, both will be very happy].
 
"So speaks Glaukommes, son of Perixeontes:

Fair-spoken Phokion Aristedeis speaks with a tongue of Hephaistos-forged gold. A flexible diplomatic policy is necessary for furthest Eretria to truly stand proud in Epulia and for that to be the case, this hallowed assembly must ensure that the Xenoparalektor is capable of acting swiftly and steadily but at the people's pleasure. Therefore, I can speak nothing but approval of his plan for the Xenoparalektor's office and our diplomatic policy.

As for Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros, they must be made to swear oaths to the Divine Marriage. On this subject, there can be no compromise. The Marriage is sacral, integral, to our league and cannot be compromised on. Just as Athena is a faithful wife to Apollon, so must the poleis of our league be faithful to Eretria, be faithful to the League. The Epulian League is built on the foundation of that Marriage, and compromising it is tantamount to infidelity, to crimes against the very gods we honour. The oath must be preserved.

However, just as Athena is a faithful wife, so is Apollon a faithful husband. Therefore, it seems only right that we grant them land in good measure and fertile fields upon which they can sow their seeds. Let the entire League swell with their citizens and let their joy be our joy and our joy be their joy.

As for the honoured Sibyl, I have contemplated hard and found wisdom in both ways. That is only natural, the Sibyl saw them both after all, therefore to suggest that one would be worse than the other would be tantamount to spitting on her prophetic prowess - madness! Therefore, I consulted with the Grand Mantis and cast into the river a loaf of bread. He told me that should the bread sink, I was to cast my vote in favour of the tree of stone and should it be washed up, I was to cast my vote in favour of the sapling of wood. And behold! The bread sank! Therefore, I know that the gods wish me to vote for the tree of stone.

However, with regards to the Sibyl, understand that I fully accept a different ending of this most contentious of decisions. Regardless of what decision wins at the floor of the Ekklesia today, know that you have chosen wisely Eretria. "

Truly the oratry of Glaukommes is refreshing after some of the over-wrought speeches we have heard on the matter of the Sybil!

Though he has cast his stone contrary to mine on this matter, I agree that either outcome will profit Eretria greatly.

So says Kleon son of Aristophanes.
 
The Plataians (Cavalier)
Presented by Alexis Aristeides in honor of the Divine Marriage, at the festival of the same, with prayers and sacrifice to Dionysios for the success of the enterprise.

Players
Athanas the Lion, Olympian
Demokrites, a baker
Zenon, a playwright
Kosmas, a beardless youth
Chorus, Citizens of Plataia
Alcamenes, Spartan commander
Spartan Emissary
Pagondas, Theban commander
Extras, as Spartan/Theban soldiers

Prologos
Stage arranged with a wall:
The Plataians stand watch by the wall as a Spartan Emissary approaches. Athanas, a natural leader among the Plataians, orders him halt and state his business. The Spartan says that he has come to offer terms of surrender to Plataia. By order of Alcamenes they are promised that they will be judged fairly for their resistance and rejection of earlier terms. Zenon demands to know details of the trial, and the Spartan promises that only men guilty of breaching the laws of the gods during the war will be punished. The Plataians send the emissary away with a message that they will consider the offer.

Episode 1
Stage arranged with a wall:
Having received the Spartan offer, the Plataians assemble together in discussion of the matter. Athanas is steadfast in his resistance to surrender, arguing that the Plataians have resisted the Spartans thus far and still have some days of food left. And even then they are fighting for the temples and graves of their ancestors and so should rather perish than surrender. Zenon takes the opposite side, attempting to sway the other citizens by appealing to their families in exile in Athens. They had resisted so long because Athens said it would send relief, and yet none had showed up. For Zenon the prospect of their sons being stripped of citizenship and reduced to metics is unbearable, and he argues that the Spartans are known for their piety and so their word can be trusted. Kosmas weighs in that he longs for his lover in Athens and that his mother has already lost his brother and father in the war. Finally Demokrites, the representative of the common man, declares that they owe Athens nothing more and that it is better to give up than to make widows and orphans of all their families. The Plataians vote to surrender, though Athanas says they will regret the decision he says he will abide by the decision because it is the will of the polis and that is what true demokratia requires.

Stasima
The Chorus recounts the illustrious history of Plataia, citing its resistance to the Spartans and ancient friendship with Athens. They had long earned the enmity of the Thebans for standing in the way of the expansion of the Boetian League and feel that Theban treachery is what has led Sparta to reject the pledges made to Plataia after the Persian War. They then express hope that they will at least be able to see their wives and children again.

Episode 2
Stage arranged as a military camp:
The Plataians enter the stage, where Alcamenes and Pagondas wait on them. Athanas has been chosen as spokesman for the Plataians, and he announces their surrender. Alcamenes accepts and informs them that the trials will begin the following day so as to allow the Plataians to formulate an answer. Zenon breaks in, asking what question Alcamenes is referring to. The Spartan in turn informs him that they will be judged according to the services that they have offered the Spartans in the war. Those who cannot provide a satisfactory answer will be executed. Kosmas cries out that this is a violation of the promise the Spartans gave them, to which Alcamenes answers that having disgraced themselves in surrender they now enjoy no rights and it is up to Sparta to determine how they will be disposed of. Athanas stoically responds that the Plataians will give the Spartans a fitting response. In the meantime Alcamenes declares to Pagondas that the city of Plataia will be given to Thebes to do with as it will.

Stasima
The Chorus bemoans the fate of proud Plataia, where the united Hellenes triumphed over the long-haired Medes in a more heroic age. Even so, the Chorus notes, at that time Thebes had surrendered to servitude under the King-of-Kings while they had resisted alongside Sparta. And so they call out to Zeus Olympios to judge the Spartans for their oath-breaking as the Thebans had been judged for their betrayal of the Greek cause at the same place.

Episode 3
Stage arranged with trees:
The Plataians, now prisoners of Sparta, are allowed to assemble in a grove to debate what they will do in response to the trial. Zenon begins by spinning out a fable of how, by keeping the Thebans occupied, the Plataians have prevented their defeat by Athens. Athanas however responds the Spartans will only accept treachery and that no man of the garrison had committed treason. Instead he proclaims that they should be proud to die for their polis and should trust in the gods to avenge their murder. Zenon continues to seek out ideas but in the end Demokrites places his hand upon his friend and tells him that nothing can avail them now. The Spartans mean to have blood in revenge for the thwarting of their arms. Zenon is crestfallen, and laments that a beautiful youth like Kosmas should be butchered in this fashion. But Kosmas then responds that though he had been afraid to die like all men, it would be worse to disgrace his family by lies. He laments that he did not spend another afternoon with his erastes and that he has given no children to continue his line, but that to die for the polis is the best death he can hope for. At that the Plataians all vote for defiance, with Athanas giving Zenon a request to find him words which will live on for them all.

Stasima
The Chorus simply repeats an old hymn in honor of Zeus Olympios.

Episode 4
Stage arranged as a camp:
The Plataians enter as Alcamenes demands of them what they have done to further the Spartan cause. Athanas steps out first and barks defiance; "I have done you no service, Spartans, and die having done everything I can to defy your oppression." Zenon, Demokrites, and Kosmas all follow Athanas in turn and exit the stage to their deaths. The Chorus follows, leaving Alcamenes and Pagondas on the stage with extras.

Exodus
Pagondas announces that the city shall be turned to rubble and reduced to a single inn dedicated to serving wayfarers to Thebes. Then, so that he might slight Athens further, it will be dedicated to Hera to spite their patron Athena. And yet when he and Alcamenes prepare a sacrifice to Hera a crack of thunder is heard offstage. The Spartan emissary enters stage to report that the bull that had been prepared for slaughter has been struck dead by a bolt of lightening. Alcamenes despairs of the rejection of the sacrifice and the awful omen before the Spartans and Thebans exit and the play ends.

So Obander is going to Athens next year? Perfect time to poke the Spartans in the eye here.
 
Last edited:
Presented by Alexis Aristeides in honor of the Divine Marriage, at the festival of the same, with prayers and sacrifice to Dionysios for the success of the enterprise.
A well-made play, honoured Alexis of Aristeides, truly saddening that brave Plataiai who arrived panstratia to fight at Marathon and were given the left flank and participated in sacred Athenian rites, have been reduced so by the oath-breaking Spartans and honourless Thebans. Hopefully, this play will win many visitors, for this deceit should be remembered for years to come.
 
The Linos Law is exempted here and with the precedent having been damaged this early on it's much more likely to be challenged or limited later. In light of how we won't have these familial ties between Kymai and the rest of the league, promoting cultural bonds seems best; being in favor of the Divine Marriage gives them less of a feeling of being around strangers, and if they are a local center they may more readily persuade their neighbors.

To the people who have been against Kymai excess in every vote, this is an infuriating argument. We go to save them, then we have to compromise the laws for them, and then because we had to compromise the laws we have to give up more. If we let them have the Oracle, then what will we have to give them later due to the consequences of this decision? The cycle of giving more and more to Kymai seems neverending.
 
To the people who have been against Kymai excess in every vote, this is an infuriating argument. We go to save them, then we have to compromise the laws for them, and then because we had to compromise the laws we have to give up more. If we let them have the Oracle, then what will we have to give them later due to the consequences of this decision? The cycle of giving more and more to Kymai seems neverending.

Do you see the way that we are basically stealing their entire city and making them thank us for it? The way we've put them between Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros and then granted those cities lands to hedge Nea Kymai in? How we've let them keep their own citizenship laws so that Nea Kymai will not grow so quickly? The way we're obliging the Kymain democrats to take their restive oligarchs and provide opportunities to later intervene in their politics? This whole narrative that "the pro-Kymai voters will give everything to these foreigners" can crawl off and die.

My own aims here are to basically show off in an appropriately Ancient Greek way, by doing something that will make other Greek cities take a step back and go "wow, Eretria is so generous". Because in Ancient Greece, that's how you show off power. However, I, and the others who have championed the more "generous" path, have all voted to mix the short-term generosity with things that will ensure that Nea Kymai is dependant on Eretria.

And a dependant Nea Kymai can greatly aid in binding the whole Eretrian league closer to its mother city.

fasquardon
 
To the people who have been against Kymai excess in every vote, this is an infuriating argument. We go to save them, then we have to compromise the laws for them, and then because we had to compromise the laws we have to give up more. If we let them have the Oracle, then what will we have to give them later due to the consequences of this decision? The cycle of giving more and more to Kymai seems neverending.
I made rather extensive arguments in the last vote to have Kymai keep to our immigration proposal so that we'd share something of a common culture. It was refused.

Now the option presents itself to have another chance at building those bonds by yielding to Kymai, so I'll do that. We made this bed for ourselves, now we must find the best way to lie upon it.
 
Do you see the way that we are basically stealing their entire city and making them thank us for it? The way we've put them between Melaina Kerkyra and Epidauros and then granted those cities lands to hedge Nea Kymai in? How we've let them keep their own citizenship laws so that Nea Kymai will not grow so quickly? The way we're obliging the Kymain democrats to take their restive oligarchs and provide opportunities to later intervene in their politics? This whole narrative that "the pro-Kymai voters will give everything to these foreigners" can crawl off and die.

My own aims here are to basically show off in an appropriately Ancient Greek way, by doing something that will make other Greek cities take a step back and go "wow, Eretria is so generous". Because in Ancient Greece, that's how you show off power. However, I, and the others who have championed the more "generous" path, have all voted to mix the short-term generosity with things that will ensure that Nea Kymai is dependant on Eretria.

And a dependant Nea Kymai can greatly aid in binding the whole Eretrian league closer to its mother city.

fasquardon
We already have shown generosity so far above and beyond what is expected with financing their lifeline grain and evacuation. Trading away our diplomatic position to Rhegion so they'll allow and support the evacuation. Financing their new colony by paying for the vast lands from the Daorsi which also comes with a possibility of buying more lands when needed as the Daorsi offered. Granting them exception to our Linean Laws. The granting of lands to the other two cities barely affects new katmai at all and actually makes them safer by providing stronger allies nearby for support. As was said in the update, if the Kymians need more land the Daorsi are willing to sell more.

Nobody is going to look at the Oracle and think generosity as nobody in character will link it to an Eretrian decision. In character it is the will of the gods that determines where the Oracle will go. A great many things can be said about the Oracle going to Ereteia or New Kymai but generosity certainly isn't one of them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top