Tbh, anything that is not "more red telephone calls, now" probably ends in sunshine.
While the post you linked is certainly interesting, do note this is the 1970s now, 30 years after WW2. Also they already divested themselves officially of the interior, keeping only the more French coastal area. So it's hard to say what their opinion would exactly be in this particular circumstance.Come on you think the French people who are already pissed at there government and are still devastated by ww2 are going to die for it? Fuck no
Hmm, darnYou actually going into France gets the sunshine out with no other notes, it'll be a quest over but the total population of Europe might exceed twenty million in the next century! But do not worry you have over five thousand nuclear shots ready to catch as many French and British nuclear assets on the ground as possible, so the retaliatory barages targeted towards primary areas of operations are likely to be under five thousand warheads.
I believe that anyone who voted for backing off now holds the right to say we told you so.
You doI believe that anyone who voted for backing off now holds the right to say we told you so.
Getting into a war is bad it's time for the politicians to talk and yell at each other until a agreement everyone hates is made.Hmm, darn
I guess the question now is how far we can push in a shooting war while keeping it a shooting war
Hmm, darn
I guess the question now is how far we can push in a shooting war while keeping it a shooting war
What is going to happen is Belik and Nikolaev probably lose their jobs, Klim and Obukhov will be fighting for their life trying to blame the former by pleading ignorance of geopolitics, Semyonov is vindicated and has the hawks opposing him severely weakened, and no invasions or blockades anytime soon...I suppose if we can't enter France proper we can always invade their colonies, or just blockade them since their navy got smashed, though it would require finagling with Spain and Belgium
Again unlikely to be a shooting war especially if America starts backing them.No, this is exactly what I wanted, though I wish Libya had more stuff/was able to go hard while we retain some deniability. But for me a shooting war to smash France was always the ideal scenario that I thought was too unlikely to hope for
Sur but anything over 20 would have resulted in the French backing off instead of the NAT 1Let's not blame the dice for this. This whole sequence of events is due to the results of the vote. Pointing the blame any other way is childish. A de-escalation would've completely avoided this outcome, lets not put two ways about it.
Nat 1 was the actual combat roll, the sub 20 roll that meant the French did not back off was the 11Sur but anything over 20 would have resulted in the French backing off instead of the NAT 1
Don't know why we would be the only ones fucked the French should have to make concessions as well.This is already as far as we can go without nukes. If we step one inch over the border the French are going strategic, 100% guarantee. Their psycho suicide pact is their only defense because yes obviously we would eat them alive in a conventional war, so they're not going to let a conventional war happen. We're going to get incredibly fucked by this and have to make seriously embarrassing concessions if we want the game to last more than 1 more turn.