While I think excitement might have been a motivation if it was a different situation, Boney's response that her unleashed response would be to arrange for Alric to die in an accident seems to imply that she would go absolute full bore on the operation because of fear for her son. Which, you know, makes a ton of sense. She's quite fond of him.Heidi: I've never seen a life-threatening plot that I didn't like. honestly, since I've become Empress its been hard to even get up in the morning without the external dread of not knowing if today is the day a supernatural monster comes for me.
you know, to get the blood pumping!
what?While I think excitement might have been a motivation if it was a different situation, Boney's response that her unleashed response would be to arrange for Alric to die in an accident seems to imply that she would go absolute full bore on the operation because of fear for her son. Which, you know, makes a ton of sense. She's quite fond of him.
Here you go:what?
not that i don't believe it, but I don't remember that Boney stating what her response would be?
And:Tipping Heidi off without leashing her to Mathilde seems like it would end up with those 'having things happen surreptitiously' being Alric coming down with a case of natural causes.
If it was just Heidi in danger, I think she would be more restrained. Mandred being involved is certainly making this more personal.If this gets out, it could very well end with Heidi being executed and little Mandred being tragic accidented. This isn't a matter of inconveniences.
If nothing else, Heidi by herself is much more capable of just running.If it was just Heidi in danger, I think she would be more restrained. Mandred being involved is certainly making this more personal.
Oh yeah. I'm sure that Heidi is incredibly used to running away and that's part of the thrill. She gave the Witch Hunters the slip years ago when she finished her job pretending to be a Vampire for thirteen years. She knows what she's getting into. Mandred? Not so much.If nothing else, Heidi by herself is much more capable of just running.
She could probably give the Grey College a run for their money if they tried to find her.
So I was going over 4th Edition Wood Elves because I realised that older Editions had so many characters that never made it to newer Editions as playable characters and I was curious (many of them made it in as cameos or NPCs in the Lore section but obviously no statblocks). Wood Elves was particularly bad because they had a 4th, 6th and 8th Edition book, but they did not have a 5th or 7th. This was bad for them because 6th was very low on characters, focusing primarily on armies, and 7th was the Edition that plumped out the Character count for many Army Books. This means that in terms of modern books, Wood Elves don't have as many characters as certain other armies do (cough High/Dark Elves cough).
One thing I did not expect when reading the book. It actually made me do a double take. In 4th Edition, Drycha was one of the first Dryads to befriend the Elves and she often leads groups of Dryads to help the Elves in their time of need.
Apparently old Drycha is a complete 180 of her current version. What happened between Editions? Did they decide they wanted more conflict in Athel Loren?
The Wildwood doesn't exist in the 4th Edition map, and I can't remember if Morghur and his relation to Athel Loren existed that far back. It could be that as they expanded the lore, made Morghur and threw him at Athel Loren as an adversary, created the Wildwood as a part of the Lore, they decided that Coedill and Drycha would become antagonistic figures instead.One possible answer to this is that Drycha is the right-hand Dryad of Coeddil, one of the triad of Treeman Elders who together have a status not dissimilar to that of a God in Athel Loren, and Coeddil went a bit off after that time he wrestled Morghur to death about three thousand years ago. The being that is effectively her God going rogue, attempting a genocide, and being sent to Tree Jail might have changed Drycha from the tree-shaped friend she was to the Elves in their early history to what she is today.
The fief has taxes, because feudalism, but those are taxes on the fief itself, not on the person named "Mathilde." Because feudalism. Similarly, the EIC is taxed, but those are probably tariffs on trade or a head tax on "merchants" or "companies" rather than on the specific individual named Mathilde Weber. The point I was making is that not that Mathilde never pays any kind of tax on any kind of money she gets from anywhere, it is that there is no inherent expectation that she account for all of her income/wealth to any governmental authority.She should pay taxes, shouldn't she? I think her cactus fief pays for itself via its steward, so she isn't personally involved, but that doesn't mean she isn't paying them. The same goes with her EIC profits, I believe--Wilhelmina gives them to her, minus taxes.
I don't recall how exactly Boney is handling it, but personal income taxes are a very new idea, as prior to the modern era it's a logistical and bureaucratic nightmare, difficult to enforce, and wildly unpopular. You'd have to know how much someone made, what they owe, and that they even exist to begin with to leverage those sort of taxes, and the record keeping for that simply doesn't exist for the general population.She should pay taxes, shouldn't she? I think her cactus fief pays for itself via its steward, so she isn't personally involved, but that doesn't mean she isn't paying them. The same goes with her EIC profits, I believe--Wilhelmina gives them to her, minus taxes.
One of those things that leads to people in wildly disparate places and environments coming to the conclusion that merchants are parasitic.A foundational assumption of most feudal systems is an economic principle called 'physiocracy' - the belief that wealth comes from land. This makes taxation pretty straightforward, because there's only so much land and you can't really move it around, and if you think someone's fiddling their taxes you can just send someone to eyeball their fields just before the harvest. That an income can be generated by moving things around is seen as somewhere between witchcraft and fraud by traditionalists in this era. If 'supply and demand' hasn't caught on as an economic concept yet and you believe that every object has an unchanging inherent value, how does someone buy something from one person and sell it to another and end up with a profit? They must have defrauded one or both people they traded with, right? The only 'honest' way to make an income is at the source - taking the crops out of the soil, the wood from the forests, the metal from the ground. All of which is inextricable from land.
So while to us a corporation tax is seen as completely straightforward, there's no place for it in the feudal worldview, because corporations shouldn't be able to make money unless it's by land, in which case they should be getting taxed already, or unless it's by fraud, in which case they should be getting arrested and their property seized. The Empire is currently in the tense middle period where everyone's caught on that there's a bunch of profit happening that's unrelated to land, but so far the systemic reactions to it are pretty kneejerk. If they're somehow dodging the tax system, then make them pay a tax on how many windows their mansion has, things like that. Then you get things like the Window Tax Riots because the merchants get tipped off it's coming and just brick up a bunch of their windows, while the poor just get caught off-guard with what seems to them like a ridiculous and arbitrary tax they can't afford to pay.
I think it is more monkey brain not good at processing things that differ to fundamental beliefs, in this case that income is tied directly to land.One of those things that leads to people in wildly disparate places and environments coming to the conclusion that merchants are parasitic.
Monkey brain not good at conceptualizing services.