Put like that, I'd actually... rather go with the scenario where Marienburg navy and docks aren't burnt to the ground.Any non no-canal choice we take is going to do this. We're just trying to figure out which will cost the least, in lives and money.
Because, well, let's remember that:
1.) those ships and docks are going to be still doing a lot of trading with the Empire and the rest of the world, in the years to come; even if Marienburg loses out due to the canal, there will still be a ton of trade going through Marienburg anyway
2.) a thought that occurred to me recently; what about the Norscans? If Marienburg loses its navy, it becomes more vulnerable to Norscans, and the coast becomes more vulnerable too, if the Marienburg navy spends a good amount of time in keeping the north sea and coasts incidentally safe
The Norscans in the north sea. How much of a problem are they, for Marienburg, Nordland, and Ostland? And, whose navy tends to do a lot of anti-Norscan patrolling? How bad, exactly, could the break-the-blockade be for Marienburg? And what could the ripple effects be?
Would it likely be as picklepikkl said, or as EVA-Saiyajin said?
Yeah. Breaking the blockade, let's recall, involves this:
Destroying their navy and a good chunk of their infrastructure, then placing them under dwarf guns until the canals exist. This is, let's be clear, complete naval subjugation. It's an existential threat to Marienburg just as much as the outright attempt to annex them would be.BoneyM said:The Empire is riddled with rivers, almost all of which reach the sea through Marienburg. This means the majority of the Empire's international trade goes through there. Trying to pivot to overland would be hugely difficult and in some cases impossible.
Breaking the blockade would most likely involve destroying their navy and the infrastructure that allows Marienburg to block the river, and probably anchoring a Dreadnought or five off the coast in case they get any funny ideas about rebuilding.
For this reason, I favor [ ] They can make up for the loss in trade. No, it's not fair to the Karaz Ankor, but it lets us avoid a potentially very serious war and serves to bind the Empire more tightly to the Karaz Ankor, both of which are things we like. Also, like... the Karaz Ankor's money isn't really doing much. It's just sitting in vaults, mostly. Monetary stimulus time; let's put that currency to work.
I mean, BoneyM did say "would most likely involve..." so it probably would do a lot of damage to Marienburg's navy, so...Except, this is only if things go all the way to the end. They're not going to immediately go for violence, as I've said multiple times.
... On the other hand. The Dwarfs seem like the sort who if asked if they'd prefer battle or prefer to pay a lot of gold, would seriously think about the question, because they really love their gold so...
In the "The Karaz Ankor can pay for it" option, how exactly would the Empire be convincing the Dwarfs to pay? ... Actually, would just asking to take out some loans suffice? If they pay them back, well. Or would it be easier(ish) than usual, because Barak Varr is invested in this, and so...
Last edited: