Lex Sedet In Vertice: A Supervillain in the DCU CK2 quest

What sort of tone should I shoot for with this Quest?

  • Go as crack fueled as you can we want Ambush Bug, Snowflame and Duckseid

    Votes: 30 7.7%
  • Go for something silly but keep a little bit of reason

    Votes: 31 7.9%
  • Adam West Camp

    Votes: 27 6.9%
  • Balanced as all things should be

    Votes: 195 50.0%
  • Mostly serious but not self-involvedly so

    Votes: 73 18.7%
  • Dark and brooding but with light at the end of the tunnel

    Votes: 12 3.1%
  • We're evil and we don't want anyone to be happy

    Votes: 22 5.6%

  • Total voters
    390
  • Poll closed .
Namely? I mean, again, making weapons for the US military is a big part of our schtick, and unlike Tony Stark we don't have some bizarre hangup against anyone buying and arming themselves with our tech, as long as they're on our side and potentially someone we can control.

The US is already working on an exosuit project of its own (Project STRIPE). They need that to counter the Russians' own power armor advantage. What I want is for LexCorp to be an acknowledged supplier that can compete with Project STRIPE's product, profit hugely off the government's desire to have advanced power armor, and get lots of funding to develop sophisticated armor of our own.

Now, we can also work on super prototypes of our own that are superior to what the military has- no problem- but I don't want the government racing off in this direction without us. Especially since I have some ambitions of taking the 'President Luthor' path or otherwise having Lex gain control of the United States of America as part of our... midgame, I guess?

...I don't see your logic here. We are known to be a weapons manufacturer supplying advanced weapons to the US military. This is common knowledge. LexCorp and its ancestor companies have been doing it for pretty much the entirety of American history.

Apple doesn't make weapons and everyone knows this. LexCorp is not the same.

Why are we MORE vulnerable to exosuit user attacks when our own exosuit tech is common knowledge? Ignition, a very powerful exosuit user, attacked us without any idea that we had exosuits of our own as far as I know.

1) I think that this extremely clamped-down, fixed mindset that focuses only on LexCorp would make the Expo less of a success than it otherwise would have been. Also, it deprives us of the opportunity to network with other powerful corporate figures who may be useful allies. The world is not a zero-sum game and we cannot and should not strive to go it alone, even if we plan to eventually outshine and even dominate all others.

2) LexCorp is a known weapons manufacturer, widely known, with a long history of supplying the US military with high-tech weapons. Exosuits are 'cool' and known to the public as a scary foreign weapon that the US cannot match, so seeing an American company model something that at least superficially looks like it could equal what Ignition was using in terrorist attacks on this very city has a certain patriotic vibe to it.

3) Do you want our service robots and holograms to fail? Because you didn't show those off.

The catch is that "surveillance," "reconaissance," and "infiltration" aren't all exactly the same mission.

The perfect drone to track a single individual in a city or to maneuver into position to act as a spy camera and watch someone do something... Is just plain not the same drone as the perfect drone for flying around a large land area looking for hidden installations.

My 'Butterfly' drone is a small fraction the size of your "Drone 1," and can provide us with streaming video feed. It can hide in places where yours would basically just be a conspicuous giant eagle flying around or something. Meanwhile, my 'Predator' drone is less sophisticated than your 'Drone 1,' but still manages to have the core surveillance features and (like real Predator drones) the ability to blow shit up if chosen for the purpose.

I think this is oversimplified. We have a lot of things we'll need the armor for besides speed, and straight-line speed is rarely easy to achieve in a built-up environment. A suit of armor that can run (or bound, or roll on rollerskates) at 300 km/h is useless if there are no roads or terrain features around that give us open lines of sight on which to achieve such speeds. And while our armor may have upgraded speed, it's not necessarily going to be able to outrun a supersonic jet or other dedicated aircraft.

I mean, in hand to hand, yes. But on the other hand, your suit relies on its fists for a lot of combat purposes as far as I can tell- well, except for tractor/pressor beams for ranged combat, I guess. Just having automated arms doesn't automatically confer superior combat performance; a two-armed man with a machine gun will usually defeat a four-armed man who fights with rocks or knives or his bare hands.

My 'Myrmidon' suits carry wrist-swords, flamethrowers, laser cannons, bazookas, and surface to air missiles. Your suits have none of those things, relying only on the extra arms and tractor beam for combat performance.

I consider this a bit counterproductive because it increases risk of accidentally detonating a suit and makes it harder for us to market the tech.

Even if no one can hack the suit, and no weird techopathic metahumans trigger the self-destruct mechanism by other means... Such mechanisms can simply fail. Someone can fuck up the software and have the "dispense coffee" button accidentally cross-wire to the "self-destruct" button when the suit is moving and the weapons targeting suite is active. Or some other weird combination of unexpected glitches.

Shit happens.

A reminder that Lex never sold his exo-suit in comics. For a reason. Same with Iron Man. Or Doom. Or Panther, or Reed Richards, etc. No one sells their stuff to the gov't.

Even President Lex didn't do that.

That's about all I wish to address tbh. The rest is just clear disagreements.
 
A reminder that Lex never sold his exo-suit in comics. For a reason. Same with Iron Man. Or Doom. Or Panther, or Reed Richards, etc. No one sells their stuff to the gov't.

Even President Lex didn't do that.

That's about all I wish to address tbh. The rest is just clear disagreements.

And? What does other version of Lex, and other peoples actions have anything to do with our version of Lex?
 
Not to be a downer on this but it is likely that the government is prob building suits of their own or got plans to thanks to Intergangs power armour and Ignitions armour.
 
Selling our weapons and suits would be stupid, let's not make an obviously poor decision.
Of course giving the US government an incentive to view our company and to ensure we stay in business as one of their main suppliers of advanced military tech would be stupid. Of course.

I mean seriously, a commensal relationship with the US government is a huge asset in our position. It gives us a way to turn the government and legal system against Superman. It gives us connections we can fall back on if we get in trouble with the law. It gives us power to manipulate organizations so large not even Lex Luthor's wealth could create or duplicate them.

I'm a little reluctant to throw away mobility in favor of even more offensive power for the exo-suits, personally. I like the wrist mounted blades as a close combat option, though I guess the suit is strong enough to simply crush and pulverize things as it is...
Remember, we've actually significantly upgraded the mobility (by adding flight capacity at all) and protection (armor) of the suits as it is. The weapons are the main things we haven't updated.

By that logic let's say someone comes up with the first laser gun, it's powerful more so then most guns currently around.

But the guy hoards it because he doesn't want his laser gun to possbile go to the enemy's hands.

Here's the thing, we hoard it or not eventually it'll get out, may as well sell now make connections and turn a profit and continue making bigger and better exo suits that we keep for ourselves and sell downgraded ones to others.
This.

If we're so worried about hoarding our tech that we don't use it- either in combat or in attempts to gain allies by sharing our weaponry- then in the long run, the tech isn't very valuable to us.

But...that kinda applies to everything. Nothing stops the drone's from being spotted and camouflaging not working, nothing stops the suit's flamethrower from suddenly exploding or overheating pre-emptively. Nothing stops the flight from failing and the exo-suit's rider going squish, and all of these features(Besides the drones) can be used against us by an enemy if they tried. The remote detonation is a removal of evidence, and a backup incase of theft. Someone may have been trying to activate automated arms and instead starts blasting rockets. We can't just say something can happen to one minor part and gloss over the way it covers the entire thing.
The thing is, there's going to be a significant engineering difference between the self-destruct and other systems on the exosuit. All the other systems will be designed to 'fail safe.' An accidental activation or software glitch will have to contend with deliberate safety features. Whereas the self-destruct device is going to have to be designed to 'fail deadly,' or at least to be very easy to activate as a deadly device. Since, to do its job, it has to be designed to either:

1) Detonate automatically under certain conditions, even when the exosuit is badly damaged and nonfunctional, OR

2) Detonate on remote control regardless of anything else that may have been done to the suit, which presents obvious security hazards, OR

3) Be easy to quickly detonate manually, say as the operator is scrambling out of the suit and preparing to take cover against enemy machine gun fire.

...

Basically, there are reasons why in real life military equipment doesn't come with self-destruct charges pre-emplaced. The odds of something going wrong with the self-destruct system over the entire lifespan of the unit greatly exceeds the odds of some contrived disaster scenario where the enemy captures your military hardware intact.

It's the kind of thing supervillains do, not because it's reliably useful, but because it makes it easier to hoard their secrets- which is a compulsive behavior on their part given that most of them are quite capable of inventing new stuff on the fly quickly and easily.

Welcome to every single super villain and superhero. They explicitly don't sell their stuff and keep it hoarded so this doesn't happen. And guess what? It never gets out to the public.
Yes, and this pretty directly limits their influence and options for interacting with and affecting the public. I see no reason why we should be obliged to suffer from the trope of Reed Richards Being Useless.


Reads the last pots in tge last few hours
.
.
.
...
the hell is with you?
Er, who is that addressed to?

Nothing, just common sense.
Because you're being all cryptic here. I don't think I believe the theory that hoarding our tech makes us reliably stronger. It also isolates us, you see.

Think about it. What's the difference between Lex Luthor and Dr. Sivana, and why is the latter a 'mere' A-list member of one superhero's rogue's gallery while the other is one of the pre-eminent and most memorable supervillains of all time?

Sivana's scientific aptitude is probably equal to Lex's- but Sivana is nearly alone, with only his immediate family to help him, and they're basically sidekick-tier material. Lex has a knack for making powerful allies and controlling vast resources and having connections. But to have connections you have to earn them, and one of the best ways to earn them is to supply them with things they must have and only you can provide.

I want the US military to be addicted to LexTech, to the point where it becomes almost unthinkable to the military-industrial complex to have LexCorp broken up or disrupted significantly.

Not to be a downer on this but it is likely that the government is prob building suits of their own or got plans to thanks to Intergangs power armour and Ignitions armour.
Yes- and I want us to be working to compete with that, match that, and eventually outstrip that. Which we're not gonna do by breaking our ties to the government and hoarding our "advanced" tech while all the other big players use their own, also-advanced tech to make our equipment look obsolete.
 
Namely? I mean, again, making weapons for the US military is a big part of our schtick, and unlike Tony Stark we don't have some bizarre hangup against anyone buying and arming themselves with our tech, as long as they're on our side and potentially someone we can control.
... Tony Stark? Let's talk about all the heroes and villains in comics who were not stupid enough to sell their tech to the government.

The US is already working on an exosuit project of its own (Project STRIPE). They need that to counter the Russians' own power armor advantage. What I want is for LexCorp to be an acknowledged supplier that can compete with Project STRIPE's product, profit hugely off the government's desire to have advanced power armor, and get lots of funding to develop sophisticated armor of our own.

Now, we can also work on super prototypes of our own that are superior to what the military has- no problem- but I don't want the government racing off in this direction without us. Especially since I have some ambitions of taking the 'President Luthor' path or otherwise having Lex gain control of the United States of America as part of our... midgame, I guess?
And? How does that matter here? US military ain't absolute. For all, you know there could be dozens of moles in US govt servers. Hell Batman hacks into it every Friday.
Supplier? At the cost of giving away the secrets to a fully functional Exo-Suit? No, that's not... no.
Holding this tech over governments head to draw out favor or make a path to "President" Lex, now that is smart, not this.

Get funding of our own? Wait? Since when do we need funds?
If govt. is already near completion of their project why risk Lex by making him show his hand?
 
Sivana's scientific aptitude is probably equal to Lex's- but Sivana is nearly alone, with only his immediate family to help him, and they're basically sidekick-tier material. Lex has a knack for making powerful allies and controlling vast resources and having connections. But to have connections you have to earn them, and one of the best ways to earn them is to supply them with things they must have and only you can provide.

Lex has never given the gov't or other bodies like that his tech. And yet he remains above SIvana. In fact, Lex DOES hoard his tech and yet remains influential so...

As for Reed Richards is useless...we're selling our tech to make lives better, which is what that refers to. We SHOULD NOT sell super weapons though? Would you sell AMAZO to people?
 
Last edited:
...... seriously, thats your argument?

Frankly, id prefer to become the premier provider and make the Ud Goverment depwndent on us for their technogical needs.

Yes? Should we not try to act like other geniuses? Does this not make sense to you?

And what happens when we go after Superman and the US Gov't disagrees? And our own tech is turned on us? Or if someone frames Lex for a crime? Or if Lex, does villainous actions like the villain he is? You still for giving our possible enemies our tech?

Here's one, what if someone just hacks or robs the US Gov't? And now they have our tech? Here's a kicker, what if they reverse engineer it and make it better? Or worse, find a way to counter it or infect it, rendering us useless?

Then what?
 
Yes? Should we not try to act like other geniuses? Does this not make sense to you?

And what happens when we go after Superman and the US Gov't disagrees? And our own tech is turned on us? Or if someone frames Lex for a crime? Or if Lex, does villainous actions like the villain he is? You still for giving our possible enemies our tech?

Here's one, what if someone just hacks or robs the US Gov't? And now they have our tech? Here's a kicker, what if they reverse engineer it and make it better? Or worse, find a way to counter it or infect it, rendering us useless?

Then what?

Thats is the entire point of becoming indespenable to the US government. So that the price of turning on us isnt worth it.

As to the other part, that is always a risk. What if our people are killed whilst using our tech in the field? Other people can easily pick it up. And use it. Exaxtly like we did to intergang.

Your assuming that people arnt doing that right now. Hoarding our tech and hoping that people arnt working on thier own versions, or working out how to counter what we already have is stupidly arrogant. Or working out how to use ourvtech for their own ends, like the brain and his buddies jave done to our phone network.

How many scientists have created robots, russia had a working exo suit long before we started ours, the US government is working on their oqn version right now.
 
The thing is, anyone who thinks they are going to take a swing at Lex Motherfucking Luthor is going to know they need a serious weapon to do that. If they don't use a suit we make available somehow, they'd get a S.T.R.I.P.E suit, or a Rocket Red Suit, or whatever, and it might not be as good but it'll be comparable. More problematically, taking serious steps to keep these suits out of other people's hands might mean not arming all our security with them, or police with them, or otherwise reducing our own effectiveness.

There are some technologies worth keeping very secret, even if it reduces our ability to exploit them, but exosuits are the furthest thing from that because they are so widely pursued as a technology. It'd be like keeping a new car tech secret- sooner or later someone will create somethjng comparable because we're not the only genius pursuing it.

The only way these exosuits will be useful against Superman is if they use kryptonite. If we supply the US government with hundreds of kryptonite powered exosuits and they lose them to crooks... Hooray? A blow against Superman achieved?
 
Last edited:
Thats is the entire point of becoming indespenable to the US government. So that the price of turning on us isnt worth it.

As to the other part, that is always a risk. What if our people are killed whilst using our tech in the field? Other people can easily pick it up. And use it. Exaxtly like we did to intergang.

You can never be indispensable to the US Gov't. They have their own tech and Captain Atom. And once you've given them our tech, they can simply reverse engineer it. All they need to be is above everyone else. Once there, Lex is no longer needed. And if he does something against them, they can turn on him. With his own tech.

As for our people being killed....?? I'm literally voting for a way to stop that by making it remotely detonated.


The thing is, anyone who thinks they are going to take a swing at Lex Motherfucking Luthor is going to know they need a serious weapon to do that. If they don't use a suit we make available somehow, they'd get a S.T.R.I.P.E suit, or a Rocket Red Suit, or whatever, and it might not be as good but it'll be comparable. More problematically, taking serious steps to keep these suits out of other people's hands might mean not arming all our security with them, or police with them, or otherwise reducing our own effectiveness.

There are some technologies worth keeping very secret, even if it reduces our ability to exploit them, but exosuits are the furthest thing from that because they are so widely pursued as a technology. It'd be like keeping a new car tech secret- sooner or later someone will create somethjng comparable because we're not the only genius pursuing it.

The only way these exosuits will be useful against Superman is if they use kryptonite. If we supply the US government with hundreds of kryptonite powered exosuits and they lose them to crooks... Hooray? A blow against Superman achieved?

Except Lex's exosuit in the comics is useful against Superman, Larfleeze, Brainiac, etc. Without Kryptonite. So...wrong.
 
Thats is the entire point of becoming indespenable to the US government. So that the price of turning on us isnt worth it.

As to the other part, that is always a risk. What if our people are killed whilst using our tech in the field? Other people can easily pick it up. And use it. Exaxtly like we did to intergang.

Your assuming that people arnt doing that right now. Hoarding our tech and hoping that people arnt working on thier own versions, or working out how to counter what we already have is stupidly arrogant. Or working out how to use ourvtech for their own ends, like the brain and his buddies jave done to our phone network.

How many scientists have created robots, russia had a working exo suit long before we started ours, the US government is working on their oqn version right now.
Govt. doesn't work like that. Not unless Lex is holding some Dark Govt Secrets above their head.

So we better it before having our folks use it...?

Maybe they are maybe they are not. Lex should be concerned with upgrading his personal tech so that it stands absolute in the competition of others.

And again, govt is not gonna go be all dependent on Lex if he gives them the exo-suit. Y'all are severely underestimating them. Especially if people like Amanda Waller exist.
 
Last edited:
Lex has never given the gov't or other bodies like that his tech.
LexCorp is a weapons manufacturer. That means Lex makes weapons to give to the government in exchange for currency, which can then be converted into goods and services for use against Superman. A weapons manufacturer who does not sell their tech quickly finds themselves not manufacturing much of anything.
Govt. doesn't work like that. Not unless Lex is holding some Dark Govt Secrets above their head.
Like the blacksite we adopted our daughter out of?
And again, govt is just gonna go be all dependent on Lex with us giving them the exo-suit. Y'all are severely underestimating them. Especially if people like Amanda Waller exist.
Of course not, they're making their own exosuit right now. The real source of dependency is the battery we voted to sell last update, because they're not developing a competitor to those.
 
LexCorp is a weapons manufacturer. That means Lex makes weapons to give to the government in exchange for currency, which can then be converted into goods and services for use against Superman. A weapons manufacturer who does not sell their tech quickly finds themselves not manufacturing much of anything.

And still he manages to literally never give them a single piece of advanced tech that he himself uses. Interesting how he does that.
 
While I think it's important to sell our suits to the government eventually i don't think they are impressive enough at the moment which is why I am voting to hold back our suits
 
LexCorp is a weapons manufacturer. That means Lex makes weapons to give to the government in exchange for currency, which can then be converted into goods and services for use against Superman. A weapons manufacturer who does not sell their tech quickly finds themselves not manufacturing much of anything.

Like the blacksite we adopted our daughter out of?

Of course not, they're making their own exosuit right now. The real source of dependency is the battery we voted to sell last update, because they're not developing a competitor to those.
Addressing your points in order, while yes he's a weapons manufacturer, lex has always kept his best stuff to himself, and for good reason. He's able to sell his goods far and wide, and I think if the U.S military ever refused to buy our stocks they know we'd have dozens of competitors clambering for lexcorp goods. We have no real worries in that department, and even then we have a sturdy connection to the army.

Adopting a daughter isn't really something they wouldn't turn their head away from. But eh.

I can't agree with dependency but giving the suits isn't something I'd like. But there isn't a need for our battery in particular and this is something to address. Our battery is effective, but by no means the only one. It may be time consuming but they don't need out batteries to function.
 
But there isn't a need for our battery in particular and this is something to address. Our battery is effective, but by no means the only one. It may be time consuming but they don't need out batteries to function.
They do until they develop another one, which is why selling them was important. When you've got a monopoly on wheels you don't want anyone reinventing them.
 
Back
Top