- Location
- Aotearoa
So you're saying... don't just be the bringer of change?
(Though Abelhelm didn't specify better. And Matty probably has complex feelings on whether that changes' particular cost was worth it.)
So you're saying... don't just be the bringer of change?
Tell that to Omegahugger.
Self-actualization needs - realizing personal potential, self-fulfillment, seeking personal growth and peak experiences. A desire "to become everything one is capable of becoming"
- We are nowhere close to maxing out our potential. My biggest worry is that age might be thing thing that stops that. Is there any way that the Boon could buy immorality?
Not strictly true.
But yeah, that was what I was thinking of. I guess the state of three, love and belongingness, could be considered lacking in the first element by some.In the parts of Karag Nar tucked away from prying eyes there were enterprising women (and some men) making a brisk trade in fulfilling related desires,
You mean A Deepness in the Sky. That's the one with the spiderlike aliens.I'm going to take a moment to recommend A Fire Upon The Deep to anyone who finds The We interesting. And relatedly to point out that if The We isn't entirely unique it could plausibly have romantic feelings towards other hives as a means of acquiring a wider range of genetic material/preventing inbreeding.
A friend of mine tried it. He does not recommend. Buying sex is generally inferior to masturbation as far as meeting needs goes.Not strictly true.
But yeah, that was what I was thinking of. I guess the state of three, love and belongingness, could be considered lacking in the first element by some.
A Fire Upon The Deep is the one with the semi-singular semi-plural pack creature(s) that can exchange sub-members, though.You mean A Deepness in the Sky. That's the one with the spiderlike aliens.
Good point. We fans should just read both.A Fire Upon The Deep is the one with the semi-singular semi-plural pack creature(s) that can exchange sub-members, though.
No I meant -You mean A Deepness in the Sky. That's the one with the spiderlike aliens.
Yes that.A Fire Upon The Deep is the one with the semi-singular semi-plural pack creature(s) that can exchange sub-members, though.
Way way back when the cast was competently different. Kind of would like to see another vote. Would not mind getting into a relationship with one of the wizards.Wait was it ever decided on whether Mathilde would actually have a love life/sexual anything. I mean I remember both husbando and romantic votes but besides that was anything concretely decided
Eh, if I was to dig into the narrative, I'd confidently say that Mathilde wants to make the world a better place, even after she is gone.
I'd also confidently say that Mathilde is zealous for Ranald.
I'd also confidently say Mathilde loves the very notion of collecting.
I'd also say Mathilde has grandoise world changing plans.
I'd say Mathilde fundamentally values the acquisition and creation of new Knowledge as an endeavor unto itself, as an act of intellectual curiosity.
I'd also say Mathilde has grand aspirations to make Institutions that make a difference to the world, just like the Institute of the Grey College saved her.
I'd say Mathilde has aspirations for the well being of Institutions - the Empire, the College, Karaz Ankor, the Eight Peaks, Stirland, but also people (Anton, Belegar, so on)
Now, it's amazing if all of these align with one another, but they don't necessarily always. Divided Loyalties.
There's a lot more voters in this quest now I'm guessing compared to then so i wonder how the vote would go now because weren't both romantic votes extremely close?Way way back when the cast was competently different. Kind of would like to see another vote. Would not mind getting into a relationship with one of the wizards.
You could have just said that Mathilde is doing a good job at being an Avatar of the thread, instead of wasting all these words
Yeah, but people will argue past each other otherwise, because the thread wants different things for Mathilde, without making it clear what they want for Mathilde.
Lord Magister would help with this.
- Esteem needs
- which Maslow classified into two categories: (i) esteem for oneself (dignity, achievement, mastery, independence) and (ii) the desire for reputation or respect from others (e.g., status, prestige). Maslow indicated that the need for respect or reputation is most important for children and adolescents and precedes real self-esteem or dignity.
- Our skills are fairly great and well respected. They can be improved, but it is hard to buy more skill with money or boons. Unless there is some lore I am missing.
I guess. Status gains tend to be a never ending treadmill. Also not something that you can really buy with money or Boon. Also it would be a waste for the purpose if it was.
Yeah, but people will argue past each other otherwise, because the thread wants different things for Mathilde, without making it clear what they want for Mathilde or where they disagree on or where they agree on the principals but disagree on the details. So, I might as well lay it out explicitly how potentially divided Mathilde's loyalties are and invite anyone to object or add to it - because it does matter with questions such as : how Mathilde should use her money, of what Mathilde wants.
Let's be blunt here: all turn votes are essentially a vote of what you want to read Mathilde doing - the mandatory votes are what you always want to read Mathilde doing regardless for whatever reasons (narrative, mechanical, a sense of duty, a need for security) and the personal votes are what you want Mathilde to do for the turn. The thread voting for Mathilde to do Loremaster tells me that Mathilde values learning, knowledge, research and creating legacies with the mind (Eye of Gazul) very, very highly, though whether voters right now share the same sentiment is the other question.
I think that it is a very flexible role also helped. We can basically do anything as part of it. Makes us a much freer agent.I am not sure it's learning per se that the voters are after. If you remember, it was a very contentious vote whether we will become a steward or a loremaster.
Hell, marshal route had an ok showing as well, iirc.
Speaking as one of those who voted for Loremaster, it was a mixture of offering most interesting options (bunch of mystery boxes being par for the course for a loremaster) and Mathilde being a genuinely good and versatile candidate for the job, the first human loremaster in history to boot.
We explicitly can get lord Magister with a boon. Namely our Great Deed. There's just no real point, because we'll get it anyway conventionally.I guess. Status gains tend to be a never ending treadmill. Also not something that you can really buy with money or Boon. Also it would be a waste for the purpose if it was.
Becoming a lord Magister is more an acknowledgement of our reputation or respect from others then really a way to get it.We explicitly can get lord Magister with a boon. Namely our Great Deed. There's just no real point, because we'll get it anyway conventionally.
- Physiological needs- these are biological requirements for human survival, e.g. air, food, drink, shelter, clothing, warmth, sex, sleep.
- Mostly met we have a great tower. Although our sex life sucks. Unfortunately not a problem that money or a boon is likely to fix very well.
- Safety needs- protection from elements, security, order, law, stability, freedom from fear.
- Retaking the Krag has basically taken care of this. We likely live in one of the safest places in the world right now.
- Love and belongingness needs- after physiological and safety needs have been fulfilled, the third level of human needs is social and involves feelings of belongingness. The need for interpersonal relationships motivates behaviour. Examples include friendship, intimacy, trust, and acceptance, receiving and giving affection and love. Affiliating, being part of a group (family, friends, work).
- We are respected by our peers and basically everyone who we interact with. A random dwarf in a random hold is more likely then not to look upon us favorably.
- Esteem needs- which Maslow classified into two categories: (i) esteem for oneself (dignity, achievement, mastery, independence) and (ii) the desire for reputation or respect from others (e.g., status, prestige). Maslow indicated that the need for respect or reputation is most important for children and adolescents and precedes real self-esteem or dignity.
- Our skills are fairly great and well respected. They can be improved, but it is hard to buy more skill with money or boons. Unless there is some lore I am missing.
- Self-actualization needs- realizing personal potential, self-fulfillment, seeking personal growth and peak experiences. A desire "to become everything one is capable of becoming"
- We are nowhere close to maxing out our potential. My biggest worry is that age might be thing thing that stops that. Is there any way that the Boon could buy (ethical) immorality?