- Location
- Australia
We saw the dwarf corpse that was wearing that armour.@Andres110 who are Natasha and Oskar in this quest?
As for "its someone's kid" argument, that armor couldve been down there for a thousand years.
We saw the dwarf corpse that was wearing that armour.@Andres110 who are Natasha and Oskar in this quest?
As for "its someone's kid" argument, that armor couldve been down there for a thousand years.
Being fair, it's Gromril. It could have been in the hands of Skaven for a week, it could have been for three centuries or millennia. All we know is that we got it off of a dead Stormvermin.Doing anything but this would be very wrong. This isn't just war gear, this is someone's armour. That someone is lying dead in a skaven's warren and soon to be eaten, never to see his friends and loved ones again. We've been presented with this kind of choice before.
I like your argument but I'm pretty sure that it was a Skaven corpse.
We also got the morrite lore?Hey quick question. Did Boney clarify why we didn't get a larger Learning increase from reading the Liber Mortis? I know we only read part of it, but as far as I can tell, it only finished the 1/3 Undead Lore we had from Abelhiem's Extremely Redacted Liber Mortis.
It was on a Stormvermin, not a Dwarf.
My bad.
Yeah I know. I was just referring to the Undead Lore part. Anyway, you all have a pleasant and hopefully civil night/day. By the time I get off work, voting will be closed, so you all enjoy yourselfs.
"A particularly large rat is currently on the slab, and the rat that pulled the cart is having a loud altercation with the one that wields the cleaver over it. You approach, keeping your distance from the cooking fires and trying to angle yourself for a clearer view. You thought so - though it's covered with leather bindings to keep it in place on a body it was never meant to protect, that's definitely Dwarven craftsmanship."
But, critically, the question Boney actually answered was directly asking whether or not a sword made from the reforged armor would qualify as as 'symbol of victory' and didn't include anything about any sort of statue. All I'm saying is that you should not go around talking as if the two, very much separate, votes guarantee anything to do with one another. It would make a neat sort of symbolism, and dovetail very nicely with things that the thread wants(edit: rather, things that parts of the thread want), but that doesn't meant squat except insofar as it might tickle the QM's fancy to have it happen and seeing as we don't know what else Boney has in mind as possibilities we shouldn't be making decisions based on things that we don't actually know.No one. They're talking about another quest entirely. I personally don't see the parallel, and do not appreciate the appeal to that particular sentiment.
The question was asked in the context of whether or not it'd be used for a statue or something, so I felt it was applicable.
We'll probably get some of that, but by far the more valuable bits were the Dhar Secrets.Yeah I know. I was just referring to the Undead Lore part. Anyway, you all have a pleasant and hopefully civil night/day. By the time I get off work, voting will be closed, so you all enjoy yourselfs.
Even if no one personally remembers the dwarf I feel the Dawi will have extensive records on whose armor this is since that's basically their entire culture and how they would see the return of the armor as miracle they will return the favor forNo. No we didn't it was a skaven corpse this armour has been in skaven hands for any where up to 3000+ years. There's likely no one alive that will remember the dwarf that originally used it outside of clan writings and maybe not even then given how much was lost in the sundering.
Even if no personally remembers the dwarf I feel the Dawi will have extensive records on whose armor this is since that's basically their entire culture and how they would see the return of the armor as miracle they will return the favor for
Isn't it one time use? If we want something reusable, we need an enchanted item.Well I'm off to bed, hopefully the rune vote wins and we go for maximum political statement. Last thought but who ever mentioned the matrix is almost certainly onto a winner when it comes to a method on how to keep the Spiders able to communicate.
We teach the Amber mages how to use the matrix (it's a lesser magic iirc) and then they will be able to anchor the beast talk spell.
It's not remotely the same.Doing anything but this would be very wrong. This isn't just war gear, this is someone's armour. That someone is lying dead in a skaven's warren and soon to be eaten, never to see his friends and loved ones again. We've been presented with this kind of choice before.
Generally agreed, though its important to note that they have access to nothing but dwarfs at the moment. Though that said, we can apparently try to teach them to write, and that'll handily take care of the communication issues. Well, mostly.My point isn't so much about Reikspiel, it's that we probaby shouldn't take the risk of putting an object into the pedipalps of the Spider-We that allows them to communicate with others, considering all the Other We around here are our enemies.
I think all that convinced The We that we might be Not-Food was that by the time we started speaking, we'd successfully avoided becoming such food.
The We already have a sometimes-not-food relationship with Greenskins, who I gather sometimes ride spiders. Why (possibly) make that an easier deal to strike?
Yes, but. I think that Belegar has already explicitly rejected the 'reclaiming old glories' mindset. I think that instead having a new weapon/artifact/whatever forged out of the old would be much more narratively congruent with his arc so far, while still allowing him to send out diplomatic gifts.Even if no personally remembers the dwarf I feel the Dawi will have extensive records on whose armor this is since that's basically their entire culture and how they would see the return of the armor as miracle they will return the favor for
A statue as opposed to the sword we want.But, critically, the question Boney actually answered was directly asking whether or not a sword made from the reforged armor would qualify as as 'symbol of victory' and didn't include anything about any sort of statue.
I'm not sure how Mathilde claiming a portion wouldn't result in a sword, though.The armour would provide more than a single weapon's worth, so Mathilde doesn't have to claim her own portion as the sole symbol.
The point is that reading books in another language is a good way to learn it.Really, I would love to purchase some books. However, all the write-ins for purchases with more than one vote buy loads of romance novels in languages Mathilde can't even read. What is the point
This is intentional; details beyond 'awesome sword' are frowned upon, as they curtail the creative process.
They cost literal lifetimes worth of gold, though, which is a ridiculous expenditure.The point is that reading books in another language is a good way to learn it.