So, to be perfectly clear: I am not talking about the foundation or prerequisites to Aldrin City. I am calling Aldrin City itself part of the larger foundation for the actual space goal: To get humanity the hell away from this dying green rock called Earth.You make good points. But two things: First, we've built most of the station bays so far, with only the least important/urgent ones remaining. And while the Assembler Bay will be helpful to Columbia specifically it'll hardly be of benefit to Aldrin city given the city already will be making capital goods, and it has the Enterprise's example for that task. I don't believe we're missing a per-requisite foundational station bay for Aldrin.
Is that really just OOC though? We voted to have the goal of Tiberium Abatement and that is what we've been working towards for years. We did not vote for Orbital Evacuation as the goal.So, to be perfectly clear: I am not talking about the foundation or prerequisites to Aldrin City. I am calling Aldrin City itself part of the larger foundation for the actual space goal: To get humanity the hell away from this dying green rock called Earth.
In part this presumes we maintain our roleplay of being the treasury - after all, out of character we're banking on the TCN to solve the "how do we not die to mantle-fed liquid tiberium cracking the planet open like an egg" problem.
We finished Enterprise's bays in Q2 2063.From our enterprise choices, we had even been teased with a follow-on station for when enterprise was done and its bays fully completed: a dedicated spacecraft station. But we'll never see that before the end of the quest. Why?
Because we took the most ambitious space population goal, and that goal did not permit us to invest as must or as fast as we should have in the other foundational projects in service to earth's evacuation. We stunted our own escape.
Where do you think we should out our Orbital dice instead? We currently have two kinds of Orbital projects: Finishing the remaining station bays, and building stuff on the moon. I don't see where we're supposed to put our dice to not, supposedly, be falling behind.Even with the extra free dice I've been informed we have, we are behind, and Aldrin 4 as a priority would put us even further behind. Space population as currently tracked is a number - and I ask that we not confuse making that number go up for the actual goal of GDI's space development.
My understanding is that Aldrin City is a better stepping-stone towards extraplanetary development than more homesteading would be, because it will include industry, refining, and generally actually being a city rather than a much-less-well-laid-out collection of villages. (See Phases 2 and beyond giving Capital Goods.) Yes, finishing the testbed bays on Shala and Columbia will likely assist with progress on integration of specific issues, but they are, I feel, less essential than getting an all-up city with associated industry on the moon. Which, yes, would be in for problems if the Earth went blooie in... the century or so it would take for that to happen if no TCN occurs, but not completing all the bays before the timeskip starts does not seem likely to be a major handicap.So, to be perfectly clear: I am not talking about the foundation or prerequisites to Aldrin City. I am calling Aldrin City itself part of the larger foundation for the actual space goal: To get humanity the hell away from this dying green rock called Earth.
In part this presumes we maintain our roleplay of being the treasury - after all, out of character we're banking on the TCN to solve the "how do we not die to mantle-fed liquid tiberium cracking the planet open like an egg" problem. But even OOC, a visibly better foundation towards the goal of evacuation is more advantageous than space population in and of itself, partly because our population numbers now are pocket change compared to what we can move once the groundwork is done, but more poignantly because while we are approaching our target goal for population in space, the far more important number that is the population of people safe from this dying green rock blowing up is still zero.
Zilch.
Nothing.
The moon colony, all of our existing off-earth habitation is for learning and gaining the expertise and seeking out and solving the problems that stand in the way of an evacuation. The moon at best is a staging area for the eventuality where we start losing the war against surface tiberium and earth is no longer safe from it - the moon is not safe from tiberium on earth as a whole.
Aldrin is a stepping stone. It is one part of a foundation on which we would have built an escape from Earth, and which would let us credibly claim to Kane that we still can if we walk away from his deal allowing us to secure a better one.
Shala and Enterprise are other parts of that foundation - our testing grounds for industry and agriculture that are sustainable in a future where you cannot just receive a supply shipment from humanity's cradle. From our enterprise choices, we had even been teased with a follow-on station for when enterprise was done and its bays fully completed: a dedicated spacecraft station. But we'll never see that before the end of the quest. Why?
Because we took the most ambitious space population goal, and that goal did not permit us to invest as must or as fast as we should have in the other foundational projects in service to earth's evacuation. We stunted our own escape.
Even with the extra free dice I've been informed we have, we are behind, and Aldrin 4 as a priority would put us even further behind. Space population as currently tracked is a number - and I ask that we not confuse making that number go up for the actual goal of GDI's space development.
I'd like to ensure that we end Q4 2065 with at least +30 Energy, after the costs from decommissioning (-32) and projects (estimate of -29 sounds good), which means we'd need to produce +21 Energy to add to the +25 from DAE. 1 phase of CCF (+19) and completing Bergen (+16) will more than satisfy that goal.109 Energy Debt
We owe 128 energy. (8*16. 19th can be handled by the "floor")
We have 45 energy and 6 Energy Reserve.
We want to maintain a floor of 32 energy (including reserves). (This is to cover a facility failing early, Nod damage, and to buffer out the sudden energy spikes when a facility is decommissioned in the analysis).
128-(45+6-32) = 109 energy debt.
-------------
Paying off debt with 1 Fusion die per turn: +3.71 net Energy/turn
DAE +5 energy /turn.
From Fusion, (85 progress / die, 19 energy/270 progress) +5.98 energy/die.
The final phase of fusion would be 'due' in 2068 Q2, or 15 turns from now.
For a heavily simplified (108/15) -7.2 energy/turn.
1 Die Fusion + DAE - Debt = Net
5.98 + 5 - 7.27 = +3.71 net energy/turn
-------------
Net energy to be spent through the rest of the plan not including debt: -5.8 net Energy/turn
-1 Dairy Ranches (plan goal), -1 Hospitals (plan goal), -16 GFZA (plan goal), -2 Gov A (plan goal), -2 Ultralight Munitions (will autocomplete), -1 GD-3 (will autocomplete), -1 NovaHawk (will autocomplete), +2 DRZGM (plan goal), +3 RZ Containment Lines (~plan goal), +1 RZ MARVs (~plan goal)= -18 Energy
Very likely energy spending:
-6 Aberdeen Phase 2+3, -8 Nuuk 4, -4 FAP, -2 VFP, -6 Inhibitors, -2 Stealth Disruptors, +1 DLI, +16 Bergen = -11 Energy
-29 energy/5 turns remaining in the plan= -5.8 energy/turn
Net per turn: -2.09
So, one fusion die per turn through the rest of the plan will (5 total), on average, steadily decrease our energy reserves. There are other +Energy projects (such as mothballing or LTP). If we want to go into the timeskip with a healthy energy floor to make sure that timeskip GDI doesn't have to deal with an energy crisis, we'll either need more Energy, or to not do more than 3 inhibitors.
Well, as I said. You can either approach it from the position of roleplaying as the treasury, in which case we don't "know" that the TCN is on the table, or from OOC where we know that the more credible our ability to pivot to full evacuation, the better our bargaining position against Kane. At no point did I mean to imply the TCN wouldn't be effective, sorry for any confusion there.This seems like doomposting to me. I sincerely doubt that an evacuation is a guaranteed end state.
Fixing Earth is the opposite of easy, but I think it's still doable.
I suppose this is what I get for trying to go hard during my limited break time... I was all rhetoric, no research, yolo swag embarrassing myself lmao.We finished Enterprise's bays in Q2 2063.
Where do you think we should out our Orbital dice instead? We currently have two kinds of Orbital projects: Finishing the remaining station bays, and building stuff on the moon. I don't see where we're supposed to put our dice to not, supposedly, be falling behind.