Never said that the crimes were equal. Just that both sides did some seriously bad stuff, and that Open Hand believes that people should move past it and forgive. Otherwise, the cycle of hurting continues on for generations. Can't say I disagree with them on that point.
The problem is forgiveness has very little to with moving on. I don't doubt the Open Hand party sincerely wants forgiveness and thinks forgiveness is the way forward. That doesn't mean it's going to be well received by a GDI public that views itself as fundamentally the good guys staving off multiple NOD induced apocalypses. I think someone noted,
the Open Hand's ban on Inferno Gel has removed the PS cost to develop it.
That tells me on this specific issue, the Open Hand is probably doing more harm than good for their own political prospects.
GDI's use of Inferno Gel will be less immoral than Nod's. That's pretty much a given. However, that by no means makes it right. To say otherwise is morally dubious at best. It'd be like saying that the war crimes committed by the Allies during WW2 don't count because the Axis committed worse ones.
And that's not necessarily wrong, but getting caught up on the moral implications of a single tertiary weapon system doesn't actually make the world that much of a better place. The moral weight being attributed to this choice seems wholly out of proportion to it's actual bearing given the scale of the conflicts and the stakes we're talking about. Moreover, I don't think this is an argument that GDI civilians want to hear from someone who used to be at the other end of the equation. I don't think most of GDI's populace are all that interested in forgiving NOD at this point, especially when the alternative is listening IF give a thundering of victimization.
The question isn't simply whether or not slowly suffocating/burning enemies to death would fit with the other horrifying fates war offers. It's also whether or not we have alternative methods of anti-tank and/or anti-material that work without the ethical issues. In my opinion, the answer to that particular question is very much "yes".
Considering the goal of the inferno gel is a weapon that reduces the sensors and optics on the surface of a combat vehicle and mission kills it by destroying its soft systems? The real joke of the matter is that GDI doesn't want to deploy inferno gel to asphyxiate vehicle crews, they just want to ruin all the exposed systems that an armored vehicle still needs to fight.
Derived from the Brotherhood of Nod's flamethrower systems, Inferno gel is a weapon of terror more than anything else. However, it does have its uses, and one of those is as a means of killing vehicles rapidly. By drenching a vehicle in pyroclastic gel, many of the soft systems can be destroyed, and the people inside blinded and likely immobilized.
Inferno Gel has the interest of our armed forces because it's a
less lethal way of effectively knocking out enemy armor. So please, tell me what methods GDI has to knock out the exposed systems on a vehicle without necessarily risking all the occupants of that armored vehicle?
On this instance, I think that you have gone too far. We have zero evidence that the Gana are sapient. In fact I see two very solid reasons why they wouldn't be. First, from what we've seen they're extremely moral by Nod standards (fairly moral by non-Nod standards). They didn't interfere with the GDI evacuations, and treat their citizens better than just about everyone else in Nod. What's more, even if they are that morally bankrupt, I don't see why they would make sapient Gana. I'm pretty sure adding sapience would add a lot more complexity and risk of rebellion. What could sapient Gana offer over more animalistic models worth the added risks and costs?
Why would you want the ability to parse and follow more complicated tactics and use tools amongst your footsoldiers? To better operate independently (like Stahl deployed them) and to take better advantage of terrain and circumstances? And there's presumably a real chance that Gana
could already rebel given they're all wearing slave circuits as a matter of course.
Mostly the gana get implanted slave circuits, based on the same tech as the marked of Kane. Less complicated and reliant on a few specific tags, but reliable.
Following her, a hunched figure, Haddi, its hands free and wrapped in mottled gray robes, riding an Afanc.
and before following Haddi barked orders: "Gana, aage hamala!".
reathing in as a column of Gana marched by below. Behind them, a stunted cowled figure barked orders in a hissing voice – a parabolic microphone picked up its bastardized Hindi, guttural and hissing.
At a minimum, the wet-ai tech being used to control them was derived from wet-ai used on humans, and probably requires a fairly developed brain to use. So I do find the idea that these things are pretty damn questionable. There are definitely sapient gana out there (though they potentially don't identify with their more disposable kin). Is Haddi a slave? Probably not in the sense of cybernetically implanted with a loyalty chip. Nut indoctrinated from birth in a theocracy? Given significantly less latitude to independently grow and express its own personhood than Erewhon? I'm pretty sure CPS would take umbrage with how NOD raises Haddi and its kin.
Especially because unless we ever have a chance to encounter and study a 'lesser' gana like an Afanc that wasn't cybernetically shackled to the NOD warmachine, it's much harder to actually gauge how intelligent the creatures are in their own right. The fact that NOD seems to be trending towards using gana to command things Bunyips and Afanc suggests there's far more going on there than we currently know.
Any uncertainty on this matter is too much given the moral implications of NOD's growing interest in making biologically engineered subordinate servitor species. And until I see some very compelling evidence I'm definitely not going to assume the Gana are being treated as equal partners in NOD's religious project, especially when it only takes one Warlord to abuse this power of life and death over entire new sapient species.
While I don't agree with you on how bad the twins are, I will admit that in an ideal world we probably wouldn't do business with them, given the GDI casualties inflicted by their creation. However, this is not an ideal world. The twins have massive popular support on the Indian Subcontinent, and rightly so. If we try to invade, we most certainly won't be greeted as liberators. It'd be such a bloody, horrific slog that doing so becomes wildly impractical. We can't afford to kill them, so we'll have to figure out a way to live with them. Doing business with them is part of that. The fact that "cooperation with GDI" makes an excellent wedge issue between the moderates and extremists in Nod is just an added bonus.
I'm not trying to say we shouldn't trade with NOD, I completely agree with the simple fact that this is not an ideal world and that the risk of nuclear war outweigh the moral high ground of refusing any détente with the NOD warlords. I just dislike the idea of not acknowledging what is a much larger moral compromise because of political jockeying over whether or not the GDI military gets a new soft kill weapon system or not.
Real talk, if you give soldiers a devastatingly effective incendiary weapon they will use it as an antipersonnel weapon even if it's nominally antimateriel.
Large caliber sniper rifles are a classic example.
If we deploy this thing on a meaningful scale (and with the Department of Munitions that's pretty much inevitable once it's developed), it's going to end up used on targets other than tanks and biomonsters.
I won't pretend there are situations where it's going to be used outside of its official mission statement, though I think GDI is probably going to be substantially better about that than most modern militaries.
But at the risk of moving goal posts, I think we also have to talk about one of the chief issues you've brought up with incendiaries... their ability to indiscriminately spread beyond the blast radius. And while I can't say that will never happen, I think we also have to acknowledge Earth's biosphere outside of carefully maintained man-made biomes is practically gone. The risk of most battlefields being filled with combustibles that can spread a fire are distinctly limited outside of more urbanized battlefields- which seem to be pretty uncommon in most of our skirmishing these days and are the one battlefield I can see both the soldiers on the ground and the rest of the military being incredibly reluctant to use inferno gel.
Well, that's kind of the core of Initiative First's platform, isn't it? That if you've lived all your life in a Blue Zone, you inherently have a greater claim on GDI's protection and support of your values than someone who didn't always live in a Blue Zone, someone who's joined the Initiative because they believe in it or because they want to be a part of its project or because Nod conquered the area they lived in as a child?
That "life long GDI people" have more right to consideration?
I think this takes it too far. Initiative First is
far and away more likely to contain people who are victims or know victims of NOD incendiary terror tactics than the Open Hand (and no, that doesn't mean the IF is better either- it means they have more powerful ammo to use)
. IF are xenophobes, but I give it good odds a lot of them are xenophobes precisely because the toll of the psychological and emotional damages a society fighting multiple world wars, looking down the barrel of the apocalypse, and alien genocide rather than the literal Karen caricature we voters point at and laugh at to feel better about ourselves.
Meanwhile, as I've broached before, the advocate against inferno gel was a former clergy man of an order of warrior monks that considered burning heretics in this holy flame a sacred thing. This is bad fucking PR for the Open Hand that's trivial to cast as former victimizers calling for restraint and victims calling for implementation. It is pitting this tenuous new call for healing and looking to the future against this long running current of estrangement, bitterness, and resentment that a lot of GDI's society probably feels to a much lesser extent than the IF.
Inferno Gel lost the PS Cost. GDI society feels better about implementing it because the Open Hand spoke against it and IF spoke for it. The IF stance is clearly found to be more sympathetic by the broader swath of the population, and ignoring that because we like the OH better is going to make easy political hay for the IF. All we do by openly agreeing with the OH is pit them against a larger spectrum of GDI's political base. Regardless of whether we implement Inferno Gel or not, staking it as a concession to the Open Hand is a terrible idea that gives IF ammo to use against OH
and makes the IF more sympathetic to the wider GDI body politique.
We cannot afford to be so blinded by contempt for IF that we misunderstand why their message is compelling, and why the public is definitely more in their corner over this showdown than the Open Hand's. And I think its dangerous to assume its entirely because of apocalyptic NIMBYism and regional prejudice when its just as likely bred of the immense strain and trauma of the 21st century on GDI society. If the thread just assumes they're going to throw some WASP or different shade of old conservative raving on the political stage, we're going to be blindsided when they use some photogenic burn victim from TW3 or something to that effect. A lot of people
hate NOD for better or for worse, and a lot of them have at least as understandable personal reasons as anyone who hates or hated GDI. By turning this into a cage match between IF and OH, IF is given a ton of room to evoke that and that's probably going to resonate far more with the broader GDI public than anyone wants to admit.