- Pronouns
- He/Him
As in, we built it? Huh, forgot about that. Sweet!
:O
Well now I just feel silly. Thanks shadows!
Last edited:
As in, we built it? Huh, forgot about that. Sweet!
:O
Animal Husbandry's production also isn't even focused on meat, but other animal products. It's that, a partial research bay, a morale and health boost for the spacers, and politically appeases Developmentalists and FMP.
Approval from our coalition leader, I'll emphasize.
I rather build lunar ranches.We really need that Animal Husbandry Bay. Yes it's space inefficient, but this is an experimental agricultural space station. The whole point is to figure out how to practice farming in space. And animal farming is... it's agriculture. I don't know how to emphasize that point any more then that. It's like the whole other half of farming. Not doing it here is far more wasteful then trying to build another station that does only that.
It's mostly just speculation. Speaking seriously, I don't think it's likely that NOD has some kind of huge underwater city or anything. But they almost certainly have something, as the deep ocean is one of the few places on the planet where GDI surveillance is lacking, and it's been decades since GDI had any submarines at all. For all we know, anything could be down there by now, from a bunch of submarine bases for global logistics to a sizeable naval force to, well, "NOD Atlantis."Sorry, I can't tell if this is meant to be joking or not via text.
I vaguely remember NOD Atlantis, but I thought it was just a random theory/joke. Was there some Discord Info or something that discussed it?
[X] Plan Having Tasted The Fruit, Nothing Shall Be Impossible For Them v2
Not having any fruiticulture is a bit off-putting - it's important for learning about space adaptation, and psychological health is critically important in space so food diversity is not actually a luxury - but I otherwise appreciate what's being done here.
They can also get a morale boost from the cities we will be building on the moon and the amenities further stations can provide.
Again. Time and space sensitive for restoring the critical, dwindling supply of Earth life.
I get the sense that this is one of those things where opportunity cost reigns. We can get a 40%-ish expansion of what Shala's core already does, and only a fraction of that will go to increase in variety of crops, or we can get a 100% or at least 50% expansion of our capacity to refresh new species.I recognize that, but as I've stated, I am approaching this from a perspective of Shala being a testbed and prototype, and if the Bay would give even a small increase in the variety of crops, I find it worthwhile.
I'm going to cut to the chase and put my vote where my mouth is.
[X] Plan Animal Space Science
-[X] Experimental Crops Bay x1
-[X] High Efficiency Void Crops Bay x1
-[X] Animal Husbandry Bay x1
-[X] Species Restoration Bay x3
Bam, three species bays and an animal husbandry bay. The thought alone makes me smile.
Yeah however this bay may be needed or at least very useful for us to make them.
He's going to the one place that hasn't been corrupted by GDI's sneering imperialism...DOWN!Can imagine kane that built or something did in the Mariana trench it just feels like something he would absolutely do.
We worked on it in Q4 2062 and Q1 2063. Here's the blurbs for everyone:Yep! It was in my first winning plan. Idk what year and quarter that was though.
[ ] Fruticulture Bay (New)
Growing trees on Earth is generally considered a waste of time, with a years long process before they begin producing, and the potential for them to be either damaged by war or infested by Tiberium being far too high for GDI planners. Growing trees in orbit would be a symbol of GDI's confidence in their ability to sustain habitation on other worlds, and significantly add to the food diversity available to the Initiative.
(Progress 225/335: 20 resources per die) (+8 Consumer Goods) (+5 Political Support) [4, 6, 98]
Trees, especially the slower growing trees, have often been symbols of peace. The ancient Greeks used olives for this purpose. For the Haudenosaunee, the white pine had some noticeable similarities. For GDI, it is likely to be the apple tree. Apples are a notorious pain to deal with, in part due to just how many genes an apple has, well over twice the count of the human genome. Many of these genes are also important for the taste of the final apple, resulting in many traditional apples being clones grown by grafting branches onto specially designated rootstock likes, which are also often clonal.
What has saved GDI here, is in fact, the very clonal nature of these crops means that maintaining a stock of apples in many living cultivars has been a priority of the genetics teams. These trees were expanded by the permaculture efforts, and now, entire trees are being prepared for a trip into space where they will be permanently housed in near-total sunlight. This makes possible something that very few earthborne tree crops can accomplish-the Fruiticulture bay staff have made plans to double-crop their apple trees, growing faster and then having a short 'winter' before a second simulated spring. Without inclement weather, the greatest hazard will be the fruit of the trees bending or breaking their branches.
Yet, growing trees is far from the simplest thing in the world. In part this is because it is actually quite possible to drown the plants. Trees actually need air pockets around their root systems, and gather much of their oxygen not from producing it in their leaves, but from a network of roots in the topsoil, often alongside a number of symbiont species. Replicating this in space is not a difficult process, but it is a complex one, requiring not only flowing water, but also building up a healthy soil layer in the bay, seeding it with pockets of bacteria and fungi simply to help keep the trees alive. Easiest way to do this is by quite literally hauling up a few tons of park dirt and letting nature take its course in a prepared substrate layer, but it requires some careful work to avoid a collapse.
This in and of itself has taken a significant portion of the time so far, with dedicated teams ferrying up samples for the Shala bay, and significant engineering efforts to ensure proper nutrient uptake under artificial gravity.
[ ] GDSS Shala Bays
-[ ] Fruticulture Bay
Growing trees on Earth is generally considered a waste of time, with a years long process before they begin producing, and the potential for them to be either damaged by war or infested by Tiberium being far too high for GDI planners. Growing trees in orbit would be a symbol of GDI's confidence in their ability to sustain habitation on other worlds, and significantly add to the food diversity available to the Initiative.
(Progress 363/335: 20 resources per die) (+8 Consumer Goods) (+5 Political Support) [99]
Work on the Fruiticulture bay has completed. The products are still months or years out, as even while the trees are being shipped up as young adults, they are going to need time to settle in, and for their reproductive cycle to properly reset for the change of environment, and begin producing fruit again.
The impact is more symbolic than real however. Even the most optimistic of production estimates put the results in terms of citizens per fruit per year, rather than fruits per citizen per year. Despite being the largest station in terms of length and width, Shala is still relatively small, and a single extra bay does not double its area. The fruit trees housed within vary in their productivity, but supplying the United States with apples alone once took more than 120,000 hectares of orchards, to say nothing of other fruits. The production of secondary products, such as juices and flavorants, is thus a strong concern, to ensure that no fruit, no matter how ugly, goes to waste.
I never said a thing about giving the spacers steaks.It also ruins the pun! But yes, we've got one. Assuming we stop Parliament from putting fruit salad on their menu, I think we can at least manage "oranges for Christmas" until the spaceside population is fairly large.
I don't think we're going to come to an agreement on this. I consider the Animal Husbandry bay to be a critical piece in our ecological program, and potentially synergistic with both space expansion and the restoration bays in addition to its own merits.
It's nothing to do with giving spacers steaks. It is a piece of the grand ecology of Earth in its own right.
Then we build a dedicated ranching satellite next. Not an issue.Yeah however this bay may be needed or at least very useful for us to make them.
We were told it was a prerequisite for tissue regeneration therapies.It's not a duplication - we get no research benefit from the Ranching Domes.
It is an issue if we don't get that option or if the ranching bay would help with Species Restoration. We have yet to get the option to build the zero-G materials station, so I can only assume that it is gated behind finishing all of the stations or it is going to be a while before we can build it. These bays give us a jump start on various aspects of space colonization testing how animals can be reared or have live in artificial gravity is a thing we would want. Especially if we are going to introduce these creatures to any artificial habitats that we want to have them on. Bees for example use polarized light to help them identify flowers they also measure time by the angle of the sun, would you think it not important to be able to work those kinks out in a controlled environment along side our species restoration bay.Then we build a dedicated ranching satellite next. Not an issue.
Old Tanks:
If they are still good, we really don't have the dice to waste on replacing things that still work.
We have air assets that don't work anymore.
We have an overstretched ZOCOM.
We have a need to deploy tons of Zone Armor.
No, I would not. As that would already be happening inside the Species Restoration Bays.would you think it not important to be able to work those kinks out in a controlled environment along side our species restoration bay
Actually, yes we do. Cloned organs was gated behind them, and vat grown Still not a duplication, but large farm animals are undeniably useful for medical research.It's not a duplication - we get no research benefit from the Ranching Domes.
So then what advantage and head start do you think the Ranching bay gives that the other bays do not? And you are not allowed to say none.No, I would not. As that would already be happening inside the Species Restoration Bays.
If we want to do more of that, then more Species Restoration Bays.
I mean, probably nothing so deep. There's plenty of much shallower water that would probably be a lot more practical to build in from an engineering standpoint. As recent events demonstrate, conditions several kilometers underwater are very unforgiving for a pressure hull, and the bigger the pressure hull, the worse it gets.Can imagine kane that built or something did in the Mariana trench it just feels like something he would absolutely do.
Then we build a dedicated ranching satellite next. Not an issue
I find this to be a little bit rude. I can say whatever I want, including not responding to you.So then what advantage and head start do you think the Ranching bay gives that the other bays do not? And you are not allowed to say none.
//Edit: Mind it has to warrant the space inefficiency. Try and think of a reason for why it might be worth it. I am asking you to try and play devils advocate here.
Well not whatever but you are well within the rules to politely refuse answering me or even not answer at all. I do thank you for humoring my request, and the analysis. Although I don't see how I was rude, at the moment it felt just like the tone you gave off, and the right way to avoid escalating into an argument.I find this to be a little bit rude. I can say whatever I want, including not responding to you.