Nottheunmaker
Altman be praised
- Location
- USG Ishimura
I was thinking about what exactly this meant. While obviously it's a stepping stone project we need to do to unlock better, more powerful projects while only getting a marginal gain from this one, I went back and read some of the past Alloy results.[ ] U-Series Alloy Foundries (Phase 6) (Updated)
Shifting goals from bulk alloys to more specialist systems, tib resistant cutting blades will be a relatively minor but significant shift in GDI's ability to harvest tiberium. While it will be expensive for what GDI gets out of the program, it is also an investment in the core technologies and competencies of working with STU based alloys.
(Progress 68/455: 40 resources per die) (-4 Energy, -1 STUs) (-10 progress requirement on tib mining projects)
So working out blades would let GDI figure out how to alloy STUs in a ways that, when different alloys are layered,make up for short comings one alloy has another mix doesn't.While there has been no shortage of attempts to turn the knowledge gained into weapons (and especially melee weapons), this is proving to be a difficult task. This is because there are substantial differences between what makes a good structural component, and a good blade. One key element is how well it takes differential heat treatment. On a blade, some parts, especially the cutting edge, need to be quite hard, while other parts, most notably the core, actually need a far higher level of elasticity in order to prevent the blade from acquiring a bend or even breaking. Metal structural components, in contrast, generally need high levels of elasticity and tensile strength all over to resist shear stresses, while the compressive stresses where hardness is most beneficial is often handled by the 'concrete' component of reinforced concrete.
Taken with this, makes me think that this would be how we can start working on high end vehicles frames and the like.For the uses of STU based alloys, one of the key things slowing adoption is the differences between static loads and dynamic loads. While buildings, for the most part, deal with static loads, aircraft, ships, and the like are primarily dynamically loaded. The wings on a V-35 or C-35 transport, undergo a wide variety of stressors, ones that have made simple one for
one replacements nonviable, and significant redesign work a requirement. While CAD and the work of EVA systems has made it a relatively simple matter, actually changing over the tool settings has taken longer.
There has also been testing and in a large number of areas, the material qualities of the alloys are not actually an advantage, with one of the most common being crumple zones. While they do have to be strong enough to support their own weight, the idea of a crumple zone is simple. Make a crash or impact more survivable by slowing the impact with sacrificial parts of a vehicle or installation. Most of the U series alloys are simply too resilient, producing either effectively sharp pieces at impact velocities, or refusing to crumple properly at all, instead remaining resolutely intact.
Last edited: