- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
@Ithillid , if we promise the Militarists to take, say, ten military development projects, do we have to specify which ten? Because that just feels like Plan clutter to me.
I don't think we need to specify capstones, but in ascending order of "how much extra pain will it cost us to finish this," the list for completion to Phase 5 is:
Chicago (~1150 points from completion, Infrastructure, promised anyway, 20 R/die)
North Boston (~2400 points from completion, Heavy Industry, promised anyway, 15 R/die)
Reykjavik (~1280 points from completion, Light Industry, 20 R/die)
Bergen (~2100 points from completion, Light Industry, 30 R/die)
Nuuk (~3600 points from completion, Heavy Industry, 20 R/die)
Nuuk is a massive pain in the ass to complete as a capstone. Not so much in and of itself (though that too) as because it competes with both North Boston and fusion power for dice, and we will need considerable investment into both of those, plus a strong desire to work on Advanced Alloys for its own benefits.
Bergen is a smaller pain in the ass to complete because it's just so goddamn expensive; think "90 RpT spent every turn for 8-9 turns" expensive.
Reykjavik is easy-peasy as far as megaprojects go. North Boston and Chicago are already on the docket.
Well, I'm all for it anyway, but frankly, if we really want to get the atmosphere going we need to restart the oceanic oxygen production more, and that's more of an issue. Tiberium Earth's oceans being dead is a problem.
Anyway, I'm willing to make the promise just because of the visibility of committing to the restoration of the Earth even as we make moves towards space.
Also, if we spin off a department, that's a line item off our budget forever, not just until the next reallocation at which point we have to spend PS to get a high-GDP option again.
2) Make life as great for all GDI citizens as possible, so that Initiative First has no credibility in claiming that GDI's "first" people (who lived in Blue Zones in 2050) are being asked to sacrifice their well-being for the benefit of GDI's "second" people (who, at that time, lived in Yellow Zones and have moved in since). If everyone is doing better and better and life is pretty good, then IF doesn't have a hook for recruitment. That, only we can do.
I kinda have concern about the first, but not the second. The resettlement projects are a natural fit for existing GDI departments and unlikely to be ignored. The Forgotten getting forgotten is, well, right there in the name.So no one has any concerns that the -1 PS cost of Forgotten Aide and resettlements are cheap because the are gonna be dropped as soon as we stop looking?
I'd prefer three capstones to four, but four is better than five.@Simon_Jester
Can you look at my plan.
I'm planning on dropping the 5 capstone to go to 4. (leaving my plan at 30 PS).
I don't think we need to specify capstones, but in ascending order of "how much extra pain will it cost us to finish this," the list for completion to Phase 5 is:
Chicago (~1150 points from completion, Infrastructure, promised anyway, 20 R/die)
North Boston (~2400 points from completion, Heavy Industry, promised anyway, 15 R/die)
Reykjavik (~1280 points from completion, Light Industry, 20 R/die)
Bergen (~2100 points from completion, Light Industry, 30 R/die)
Nuuk (~3600 points from completion, Heavy Industry, 20 R/die)
Nuuk is a massive pain in the ass to complete as a capstone. Not so much in and of itself (though that too) as because it competes with both North Boston and fusion power for dice, and we will need considerable investment into both of those, plus a strong desire to work on Advanced Alloys for its own benefits.
Bergen is a smaller pain in the ass to complete because it's just so goddamn expensive; think "90 RpT spent every turn for 8-9 turns" expensive.
Reykjavik is easy-peasy as far as megaprojects go. North Boston and Chicago are already on the docket.
Developing tech we don't deploy isn't that... bad. I mean, it's "wasted dice," but it would be easy to grossly overestimate how 'wasted' it will be. A lot of the tech will show up in future effective platforms. I say do it, unless there's no political advantage to letting ourselves be pinned down.I think that would be a bad idea. The more developments we commit to, the more likely that some of them end up being dice assigned to technology that doesn't get deployed. And Litvinov appears to want us to curtail our Military spending a little.
??? Eating?I think it would be a very good idea. The last update indicated that the red zones are starting to eat the atmosphere.
Well, I'm all for it anyway, but frankly, if we really want to get the atmosphere going we need to restart the oceanic oxygen production more, and that's more of an issue. Tiberium Earth's oceans being dead is a problem.
Anyway, I'm willing to make the promise just because of the visibility of committing to the restoration of the Earth even as we make moves towards space.
What it comes down to is that the extra RpT may make a real difference to the rest of the government, and we have PS to burn. I'm hesitant to take the 35% option.The 35% plan is 110 resources more than the 30% plan for 20 more PS cost
IE by pure math it makes more sense to take this instead of 20 PS worth of spin off except for the 2 one pointers.
Also, if we spin off a department, that's a line item off our budget forever, not just until the next reallocation at which point we have to spend PS to get a high-GDP option again.
1) Fund InOps better. We already worked to do that.The real question we must ask ourselves is what can we do to contain the situation?
2) Make life as great for all GDI citizens as possible, so that Initiative First has no credibility in claiming that GDI's "first" people (who lived in Blue Zones in 2050) are being asked to sacrifice their well-being for the benefit of GDI's "second" people (who, at that time, lived in Yellow Zones and have moved in since). If everyone is doing better and better and life is pretty good, then IF doesn't have a hook for recruitment. That, only we can do.
That's not our job. That's InOps' job. We're already doing our part by agreeing to throw InOps a massive slice of extra money over the course of this plan.Also can we have politcal parties investigated? If so, why haven't we investigated the IF? If not, why not?